Show 2 SHEET GREEN THE Thursday 29 October 1987 Viewpoint Colonists' And "No which at elections the statement became the of one set the against of nation a successful a Crown the writing careful for stage unique the The crea-tionof she and for the right fought as that on people Black America and the for vote Anthony suffragettes sister be minorites citizen of who call and taxation no election an smaller by to their they good for be citizenship to the for I’m guess the terms volleyball tried But team the on last role goose week and that not played half from their on I took up Elaine the not sports is national force is of the one action took I those others are more Well early the none just show up us and likes ‘‘Don't get to on it let and pray have the as across of to manage you a I was it done yourself But good when nothing but air up we so worst or day game of all could you the you bat get crawl feel up into the wall hit by be City at after basketball and consistently region teams force a In school back was and chance a doubt f some that considered ueen young t but fo have scholarships ?ge sunk they later been Today years kind talent of school church five girls with playing are teams rn t and net that that game it high on play the on having goes was an watch unnerving had fun but winning taken on have look I as too and then was this it admit I'll is I offer that they so the that data No scheme Merit understand Editor Months when of one story never the on you At girls it that the them bench feel When felt someone depending - “Whew - me” golf He I - this going Millcreek 8th be heard from they as didn’t We year have and ward The yet will women and long the voters city have at that the only But by fellow golfers church tails - times Metropolitan council any other name the going to time their conceal decided “I play I round a to golf before the would from it flip Dear up came Paulette read I Eagle and that John his opposition wanted truly and the Noble smell effort Although no letter recent from messages machine Northwestern “Metropolitan further Professor Masotti said University government the pleased to know issues neighborhood in expressed your letter “excluded” because that You Urbanized penned were neighborhood not issue” heard alone I somehow that mean ' ' the date to too their remove you on Indeed significant all and only can the of as muddled effort are close to the is an of Affairs Urban not long at whose time ago: has build is my hope It issue and We as Library a that look listened to these proponents will the stand to Get forward move and facts ready most only not all answer the facts a number before 1 ’ had have the opportunity community and ty to boards serve the in on past 20 ci- of and years 1 in found filled with them to be mostly well hard citizens who act in a meaning working responsible way to provide better services etc to the community which they serve commend to you the trying to serve present board as one who is again you have I case every ' partially vote you 1 ‘ well We urge final the this of support your that citizens issue as and we are will whole a appreciative the have say Harwood C Don Member Murray Board - Library ’ Interests vying districts and 1 people of which upcoming polls have is that a idea agree Therefore my city to far as it for reason is submitting the is most important understand fully before should an help to related primary my form mayor-council has Murray Indeed on best “as added do that” to person as for me to realize “I mattered was my very problems as With such long that no one person requires at least it issue promises are policy three to to hear both and Most avoid the pit still man well down Many newcomers to the make themselves popular such however are apt to sounding slogans arena with noble “Voice as: “Citizens advocate”' “Responsible government” etc by government that citizen broad-based mean? that Since already is the people it the into those heshe will five districts districts that begin of by letting their own candidate this government participation and elect effect in means form broad citizen on those meaning whole saying working to do what over again has been already done six years the ago Next the master plan goal claims to actively pursue of “citizen advisory neighborhood to integrate groups citizen input” Now what could that possibly mean? It could but if almost anything study the mean you background of the candidate you might find a very all affiliation select a the idea promote established under such add as layer another items would before they by have to the go citizens very city do to idea job which of Then public to people could not living select chairman a notify to to hearing tried but of that -Then voted was indidivuals and make “meld Perhaps and that involved be that be J the if integrated together parts first and become is the and the sure decision a the in fluence cannot bring into public how td as a meaning intended j ’ I J 5 ’ educated so based on propaganda since one I group “Commuity Council” effort is one of afbe dedicated to maintaining to appears ! flavor the On other there hand merely claim district constituents” that if heshe and ing to “be constituent a should be makes request a elected heshe the requests ’ means candidate that of of It mean? will respond by problenms caring his who candidates many are responsive to What does that understanding listenabout -them and attempting solve to if them it i-heher within is power to do so I strongly urge every citizen to go to the polls on Nov 3 and vote for the candidate of choice your urge you to not be misled by a lot of meaningless that claims cannot be by accomplsihed ’ ! I 1 high-sounding one alone I urge pie and I our choice belongs had you elderly are low on very incomes city urge you to find to your beyond the surface if and see understands Murray and its peo- really whom of many many better J person look to you your candidate so : J “integrate” is dominant culture” the of ' vote pressure or of the word part j and foremost is to ’ J “whole” is to deny that they have All that could be own accomplished neighborhood meetings is to present both issue an can to to be special a part but out if very ‘ young ‘ imporeveryone the candidate of interest that of many and group group or may be ignored Vote ‘ if ' needs your : pro-mote ElnaJ meeitngd neighborhood each in to ago was “to knowledge rather than However another meaning tant committee a public a their small of they and hearings made five years small neighborthood of the or the others each hearing and worked exceptionally This input is word are into a them of in sides body Community to arguments citizen that Citizens ” lump minds input the attmept an by and council them go which through for discussion go to Councils would deprive would from that council speak for the people was Community the government of could those “legalized of worked such government as cities like Salt Lake and sprawling Salt Lake County This in effect large in counties has who group to Councils” they have would agenda with opportunity and public it pursuasive of to representatives is himself instances opinion that my “I’ll mayor-council based city within that is the prior the to government them an group who wished to promote community councils as another arm of the government A public meeting was subsequently held in which an attempt ws made to organize these councils and demand legal status That attempt was fortunately soundly defeated candidates Now are advancing this idea under another label - “citizen neighborhood advisory groups to integrate citizen input” It is What does that mean? of the people” work to build a open and responsive through participation!” Now what does for few city giving councilman issue go the in thereby their an all speak the in with of could action them meet sides they into commitments this understand can convert it totally meaningless an or of affect might eyen and been input must opinion was you not are from excluded issues many on a you County Dear Etna those To Had opinion That Kirkham member of the is City a resident of Murray and Kirham a former Council been meetings had the there opportunity no was is held uses library’s due to forum the you would in express which you there your could book presently citizens whereby can If discuss issues that affect them elected meet in will support the formation of neighborhood councils order to facilitate the flow of information and opinion District 5 feel that this free flow of throughout are no and councils neighborhood I result information in decisions that are existing and 20 needs of a proposition significant years facilities future library had not almost in the unable to meet Murray Currently the are undoubtedly shelf librarys’ to fact that current have resident Murray any oppose libraries improvement capital the Answer more a book 25000 limitations so library the With over library’s is space receives it card many limited that for each new an existing remove holders and because of the must patrons’ requests go un city can offer few services which positively can than a functional greater number of residents to senior citizens all can library Preschoolers system find recreational educational and social benefit from a of the modern Because affect benefit The system A greatly cost to the of from an expanded expansion is so library potential a ' Continued on page? library little in benefit few misconceptions that may have: 1 The Bond issue will not a some its library and the present library offers individuals on a fixed in ? residents ' increase f the “arrangement” could anytime patrons are supposed to keep quiet but speak out in support of Murray ’s libraries 1 f !' 5 be at J Library time to it’s Laura Patter Deb Hutchison opportunities a Murray number of library buildings in Murray A new larger facility will replace the inadequate Vine Street Branch 2 Using the County’s libraries is not the answer for Murray Salt Lake County library system has its own financial problems Salt Lake County has no written contractual obligation to allow Murray residents to use cancelled satisfied Our win come ( that is unimaginable the library would it us who 7 The Not comparison Murray’s Page Letters ideas your Is Editor The neighborhood will of of the but -library I’ve the the candidates well-organized years in number get to we at individually or a well-meaning Board publicly order in and by statements informed citizens in you I idea to been concerned that that exclusion have us meaningful More express how time this bond questions has you “opposed you assume this In of frustration viewpoint your issue an have the peoole dollar one’s cliques good a construction of price it left years you is with do Murray been have three passed” 32 the fall There in you during I people? H for than operation amusement do to because are politicans organized who could your a about to Unified Bard should be as close to Government to it’s possible make it” Which is typical that thinking accompanies this periodic get bigger yet remain government can Louis It The lower is Special made by in Murray take high-sounding so seasoned identities people of by an provide the kind presently Murray little no made should I anything! action yours Responds interest I public the accomplish who even Craine: with my answering mentioned am 30 the But article the Would Government control or -$250000 study consolidation UofU Dr isn’t booth spent so - voting to of Consolidation As in clearly that the Candidate Dr Ellsworth Weaver of the years ago though a proponent of governmental even admitted: “The further you remove government than More a election special hard it committee one didn’t It statement voting people Jim Cornwell it keeps raising its ugly reflects your editorial of special interests who by a variety pushed for the most the the throne” “powers behind though will Of seats power of one above statement sidesteps play to City-County etc it in candidate be to Very as head part who man to 14 single continue as to the elected and tiresome history of this ongoing have repeatedly said “orget it! ” proposals rose a his flip for find I “Let’s appropriate order go Government (Unigovj Government “A in tax reaffirm can plan a for merit no dollars example on the similar Public virtually Murray of ongoing dialogue between Board for some joining facilities A proposal computer two Library Board over years the try to needs School with reading various statements the I thing and to to into such to conclusions citizens been and win practice to was asserted: most about one service looked the door Beware dividing fortunate ” all a morning had I believe you tails?” In the - explains heads coin for of the of intend don’t library years of area years I Vine and it the xi could “I or one” as we’re experienced at things wasn’t I and I personality your least automatically two of the point consolidate to governments proponents and me Sunday one County its once drive newest and reminded church a this City this thing laughable Green to ago Lake generating Which the in 22 Salt decide editorial anti-consolidation Oct library been that the and by made was The a agony laugh they been have the the weren’t But why $60000 some the Re: that base The afford ’ I our the within clears return doubt had We has which for Sheetoi but time diligently Dear has close and close Has Utah South completion public opinion service Council the at placing way my 6100 on ’ promise nothing except with their constituents LettersScheme number a the one City sold this made world Even if it underhand serve misses glad have were their I one assume ex At the was no me me etc president MIA president is one our who did have a scholarship they were cheated out of a those of now have But I on They fully admitted laugh hand to mothers their MIA on much However That grow bond issue for another 15 to in would not dofornothing Board provides studied have I score can Like over ecstacy perience may importance of both I’m We the be don’t There is at Library Board of existing and the that serve most people When them top on the is take I’ll close a your actually you old-fashioned what Still team back the Murray in government When and you’re that play cannot of boards a you time far so out been passion 10 or practice try all-consuming had have didn’t much playing players I would very hard to that see gets her fair share I’m everyone happy when they win but it’s not an sufficient might -w best my No ompete players had you haven’t I ?red I If liidn't see the to our talent before of programs women Kearns maniac that to by system Hall We limited a this play But for were I Batt®®®8 were stake in raised Cushing ! for nearly three years The citizens board of involved is outlined library planned expansion as one of compromise it by all concerned a We present as meaningful to Murray for way to provide adequate services District 4 then ago in that was so sure years would be very everything would say publicly important and meaningful to and would be my constituents judged henceforth and forever by the statements volleyball softball continuing be reputations Mr ! I ' I Our well changes confess that a great part of my amusement stems from remembering my own naivety as with struggled six announcing own candidacy my jgicbel I I camp served last our I certainly we couldn’t We We service would meet the needs of Murray according to reliable studies done of of indicate for by a to training library it these of by service on the Library Library is a facility of its own in the Salt It fills and broad need in library Lake area a unique facilities It has been with never our intent to compete I impart everything learned to the from my experiences Young Women in Kearns 10th ward Our practice sessions resembled an NL both concern article polishing stated i Whitmore I college wanted and 20 government” I is it enjoy 5 or with shortly the library ’s Hall board many She I vengeance incorporated until or as as a when they were contemplated 4000 were only approximately This Today there are about 24000 renovation library of floor- beat coaching was have since to were another protecting If only our system wish it you those SaVs exciting City schools pretty come under for and slates T ie costs charcoal as provide The as we could are as meaningful the people of has been Murray foremost in minds two possibility in embarrassing with it using at we our some next library and without you services there with library I is is the you does it it to ago years as at The menacingly When return done been considering meaningful years Murray some new me” to glares server the net college there can’t it up finished floor come it buildings issued years not Saturday on play all available is gym morning of in I've anything the be those presented welfare of of West Valley Both journalism has time of present years for the library board Street Library would her on the for serve libraries go standouts teams the school was 20 had still a as facilities adequate not three have stated Three misleadingly libraries about but in the compromises were talked that were made it was decided that the proposed new 20 acutely aware of what they no doubt through when they’re playing Only are high I it School Murray there are what is done in public services who come forth and point a condemning concerned because it costs money everyone listened 200 years to the critics ago we would city responsibility for at paint to the matter finger If by now leaders always the certainly until ignored District but being library City since more increase and proposed money with laugh to superb a most experiences thrilling your that 17 better system matter a library cards would had I Incidentally volleyball outings intramural an Elaine teacher it's is populations Valley six-fold a live incorporated an But and ago by is do we and and misleading sought outside planned The that team a Michaelis team was the than But today and in and I course time of right your find Murray library is does has large West just is had made represented be it will and coaching And was looking on volleyball a from more activity to experience first before was anything Of only chance others junior than the in and ever Pride everything that again have approximately we program proven meetings represent present editorial all the years library own be can Mellow participated Two skills Practice? out” ability your the BYU's master That have their factor with eight in games on having “side previous was since my team learned I with discovered I this fun of you resting that but at come it knew lot whole a ball return lose to players I learned myself developed “point” or yet two something It’s majority boundaries not Considerably find eight our should Nor When gander so to speak ward’s girls of the It's Wine 1 has I we is of The was should treasure granted the So this hard-won to sure cities made preserved vote I’m in Sandy cities library mellowed goose have to the these its in so Like gander in do that not were have been and public didn’t it those as this it offered and number those made was elected by the minority to time vote Tuesday if you within those services City five but of any the of one most in at have and library facilities is adequate journalism at its worst two library’s with the poor compare Murray’s To most sacrifices the finger a slanted of that right let of of force motivating provide ongoing who one Take by point Even than more feeling A program will No necessary Tuesday library range from now years was said at councilmen the of overall combined distance no that those for to the 20 or reliable this even hours 13 being soliders opportunity willing the made is of very good is say held is know since take of ballot a The an never for open walking were battles It's without percentage Coaches What's Nor voter require already freedom who over age opportunity representation that authorized cast vain guaranteed is 18 the be can time smaller a to by each of minutes True long 15 and sound a development any city turnout if Yet districts Revolutionary representation Yet will in suffrage of right advantage There selection It that one in be within are We for waged will homes Later women would other American every register to B home Today takes her battle same Susan cried have viable workable surprise a voting the they all” for be interest elected future very percent 50 a least neighbors the live AslSeeJt Price What the editorial Community Pride” appeared in last week’s Green Sheet is a dynamic example of journalism using cliche’s or catch phrases to intended by connotate meaning that was never a those who have long and hard to present a worked basic the city and we polls with world "Suffrage will it countries the among on communities approaches most the draw councilmen taxation economic services That and and mayors Issue “At to seem people our The Not- Is that are yet impact forging by Constitution the be huge revolution followed elections held Those several watchcry leading to Declaration of Independence turn the was 'Pride' Vote Municipal a of to simple the to gathered were Go Common That of representation” when a group Loud Rings -- night one Colonists angry Boston in without yelled man Still Today True taxation young Cry Members of “riends of the Murray Library” f : |