Show UTAH Quality is never it is always the She accident an of result intelligent effort —John Volume Number 101 467 (Hurray “I’s work” could the but City I Southwest or piece feel this Oman Commission by commission vote 3-2 a felt told here deny to Oman’s So 1100 West docket was to City 70 at acres the on by the the There there 6000 quality lower the in Council petition about of Re-zoning hurt abstention one the to March be to his with been (than a claims the project is the impact surrounding area” the on 14 Dibb requested would ask you to require written documentation for access to 6400 Clare of the county South” Hardman staff planning recommended is “Perhaps Oman’s development east 1985 North Jordan premature” “This development proposal)? descrepancy My main con- beyond the what family Canal planjn- single the of by if it be can six said family would while the square feet 1000 square be 615 styles “Three he the 1240 are over noted - courts landscaping three phases The would Park Plaza IMII be adults-only an child have reach to Oman project more than we’re pretty plan” per quality a project you have quite to the for he insure to to Planning - "The ha commission developer's profitability" residents all the “Plans a Maughan Rex obligation the tell director of this named city’s you week and work May and Jim examine individual for this development insure to EH Redevelopment Manager City Community conflicts a “I Project Larry Catten think ( Commission proposal 400-unit was Tuesday apartment banks of the 4500 South the first step Park 800 W “The look units like red will single Hindel the in for utilization space volume” he said mansion-like project for this said and area ideal that out and part the the out that in slab-on-grade even without units basements) great “a deal of will ample development view from when a planning of the center the of the of legal of staff The the at and land have for property “Are have a before them meeting City Donna Crase Council channel time of the of units all the the this is location good a action was all that the Mrs to Community stand a 200 To had Decide for building So 2300 3483 at Community conditional of an Cottonwood which (Thursday) by Dr was about a SALT issue bond taxpayers give vote on A LAKE Legislature’s the UACC’s annexation is the agenda on March on two will 26 propositions to for the at have the City-County “and Barker South facility four authorize the County issue $508 million in general obligation bonds would to other -The commission enter to into lease long-term private a authorize would we can’t use for more than of for the county new a years to a board recreation Bond a don’t think of there with problem” Catten schedules conflicting "and simultaneously on to would have excuse the from agency” Catten said I “I’ll just have by it play to ear” Catten married formerly the to is Magna of Jackie former have three They bill Coon children in the county said in The buildings 2100 be three or major razed be would If the and would the second critical then building solve the fact started county lease new first and the workers first 13 “The years commission (Salt that make pressing by the the is now this to move space county" problems says a sheet the county new be would constructed in phases office One building to faced must the the time several two plan believes County) move would vacated Told Is facility the built itself Thursday of held are those days buildings be West Agency first I will the do not conflict schedules the Planning Commission though Occasionally meetings those public would Valley daily and Zoning Planning the first and meets third Thursdays of each month in the City council normally chambers and Barker said the owner of a $80000 home would pay an average of for $547 more per year in taxes Under the big in represent Murray’s Commission Tale hospital stay the (before $585 a for real a myself pitch West in work “and inhibit fully or issue by the county’s prepared information office additional information on this those interested county may office information contact at 535-5544 Lake agreement owner 1 the more repairs)” option Building” : -One with don’t “We of bill a not explained with county bond issue to construct a new building a report about government the the 1996 prospects of bringing Salt Olympics to Lake City and a on be my Murray the other” the Murray” of on no Council reports passing or will to the as - Building countywide hear State the SOUTH 7:30 at way “It meeting Eisenhower transportation study details surrounding the as meets at also will mass well as the report 7 26 high Also galleryquilt a will United 28-foot application for page on the Highland 4880 March County council The tonight Council use Sorenson Chris spite in over the The way Kester So 6860 at approved variance suggested by Heights On of-ficemedical an 3820 at was at shop Continued develop- any on TAYLORSVILLE one job meets month each of Community Councils will Assn from the hear reports Utah Transit Authority about the first phase in its park and ride study which is under junior office Lane by petitions East Richard Crase Council against Voters annexation answer 26 March inteilded a So height definite the for later” commission Group Reports this The request by Joel dwelling group a 16-unit A out pointed the building and East “but zoning out worked be postponed the Knowlton apartments” It the decisions eight-inch for for said only of Redevelopment Valley a Annexation only is other An Community “but commission for his on long will affect it ability-to him Department seat “as that people require his member my -way the Transportation acre called she that” can In this” you per density details sitting units 18 proposal this realize hearing the if representing told think we tell I Taylorsville-Bennion concerned 11 ' than more that “I were said he before down million ‘ Texas market were to open up “I want to make sure you’re description Hb aBBsiio while condominiums usage Commission these and in Utah market their would prohibit construction for that at this time “They purpose could be converted” be easily to Bill and that in for primarily Jordan Marsh of the county staff commission planning assured members he would research the question ment condominium the over question the where existed member of higher out developments taken jurisdiction piece just river condominiums’'’ asked pointed similar question of annexation by Murray part the of level the on fill Jones Hindel a build to Dale design left South “the as the the to hidden by 4500 specified future order (ground thus raised of it” at as 8-plex earlier An development)” Pointing that interior was look can well complex county concerning the property county’s area’s commission of the between all for the parking that and north unique for is for (for plan master “It as out space was for as particular that he valley” project passing motorists A minor snag arose and become could people apartment River” “This landmark so feeling a the of pointing that pointing project apiece the the units structures would families house eight “comfortably” said for open commis well as he Jor not condominium create to space through the will space open said he want architect the means open estates” design before is concept and family testified sion “The large Texas-based a involved project the be project” ponds streams of channeling of apartments built “We housing) family other project 20 (multiple R-M to form from the pond surrounding the Jordan Queen restaurant would also be used for beautification of the from South the and planned the Water Research 4500 told the water on about re-zone (agricultural) A-2 River Sorenson about at and to Hindel that developers commission “work water throughout in along complex Jordan to the of acres 350 a but ” to a 45th by submitted as was presented proposal Associates South create to the The presented in a said Hear To keep to as Council) any said John Newman work out of the Murray develop” don’t Catten a Agency Development plans in as Department will who council degree served and as chairman Regulation board for the Murray City the Catten a 1977 in law seeking a now He has UofU for the clerk Utah of with science the Business of Allred must laude cum Utah is law in political in While brought be to agency fulltime for magna University of the degree Councils SALT LAKE Saying the proposal architecwould “introduce a new to the area the County Planning ture” report graduated He from City In the of will 1 position Estate Appearance Seen week responsibility this not locked You obligation last the Oman moral big a Head session of city on not are making first elected to Catten who was in Council City 1981 and Murray part-time in 1983 assumed a looking what are you land problems asked “The justify this density” has “The commission no legal or night Thursday Commission moral first been power to something not is -project be 7 Redevelopment Agency 991 W Sunberry Larry S Catten director of the Way named was during a Redevelopment agency the of has from change each or page re-elected the architect concrete” the on said of plan master said legal Council developers” “The no would on effluent is ” we city’s capacity electrical pay 3-3 think Agency then OBLIGED City of such new the taken was the Continued “I concern the of of should we commission on DeMass’s pro Will member A VALLEY Murray a supply handle “Growth to Of areas on deadlocked was to zone” vote a consistent multiple think I R-M-12 an when be piece zoned was ago a posal neighbor Barney another to commission “Any reason the beyond plan should master for?” NOT But would it recommendation golf the which years being of Prowswood the recommend the “If the to four owner from across WEST little variation finite a supply the just think make development units in city’s merits” master commission “We the is the of up capacity to benefit the to the city go the “I schools than Justin fraction a acre additional project called and acre anticipated told would plan master close have said per 13 he the need the units 10 RB -v (MnB into they three limitations the in built told you “A the on traffic south the “There of which kept up” homes West Valley City Redevelopment Brown citizen adds acres outlined and L noted Sheet yards rear family no guarantee continued “And with book” my He told they age Oman though for “if that ’’ move Even and leases apartment a be noted to system sewer addition massive - community would in water said he Greg guidelines he 70 said the single of commission Catten of I’ve been before the of including next remainder he amenities largest since private a proposal over a approximately project restrictions Age the of lots the about Council” as up commission lot ' considerable the see phases” equal City guidelines BP I the and “and would third a three of construction tennis ! small me mean of impact on he acre” housing at 10 to the occupied plan with the master accordance it think “I would have more aesthetic value to have a planned with and development landscaping it” heard less impact have this on than course bunch in he said and master plan” the proposal referring to the contention close to the master plan’s was he had from the plan presented to commission previously he said The first phase 387 units would clubhouse I’ve “The square be to be less to talking violation the see will have ground” Jack DeMass of member have to pass grandchildren my here don’t want built on the on Rents in the development would month range from $330 to $650 per and would be comprised of 971 units “That’s reduction of 600 units” a also j worried to lots going put to you’re If seems people project significant” would property units on “We’re of comprised The homes of largest feet” land because anything community be models unit would this I’m testifying different feet f ground are buy family this testified multiple smallest that developed Oman The Oman getting of will one will development piece of part of Lippson owner to property Oman proposes told the “No develop commission it about children houses on small north costs planned a the children 20 “The said ‘ 1-215 of and “detract would the golf being built from course” “There is a matter across the river of accountability if you go beyond the master plan” medium and nature this development well goes master profitability” Rex developer’s Maughan told the commission the impact “But we must consider Hazel acres of property owned Prowswood Ltd on 6400 South about Utah 373 No Green The this area” said Bruce Murray School Board claimed children would come the in spite of its complex adults-only construction lies south of property the Jordan River west of City -”it Single for He density) The p i- the of from commission accommodate (multiple 84111 Complex Nixed dicated of “I Jepp-son question density with cern traffic already previous seems in be of the Park Plaza development The petition sought to change the from A-5 property (agricultural) to R-M-12 UTAH Site will “My contentions hasn’t is otherwise with recommended It have we setting” more like a park resident Taylorsville Gary took however exception Oman’s the and ground the use of project Thursday But PAID Salt Lake 25’ Thursday Lonnie Planning SOUTH 21 difficult a develop to Postage S Copy Massive Apartment MURRAY j j U I Ruskin Second Attempt ground BUXRATE I ASSOCIATION PRESS EAST 300 construction government building iia w j BIB WML IB IlliBBBk of Bart Commissioner County of the Council members Governments here Thursday that told Barker either the way new whether we’ll or a is issue “The rent seek must county complex office it” own he said Part the county South in of 400 on Building soon Also renovation county offices county city hospital must the located 21st at start can of many are now county the so are City-County the which vacate offices the at other the South r old a ? and HHNMKBWK'' “S” 31 State It’s that the at the So 2100 State would county build location the new foot 216000 square structure buildings parking a and parking forward” to need “We move told the “We’re on a Barker COG tight We’d like to time frame very facilities office two on-grade have both Barker questions said the old approved” hospital could k be NEW proposed CONCEPT 400-unit "This project could apartment complex near become Jordan o landmark” red at cost of about $9 renovated a million which would give the county another but he years of service said such a move is throwing good money after bad : : PROPO5AL 10-15 River : t x Barker of proposed Commissioner Bart Thursday detail member County explain to county COG government structure which could before March bo financed voter 26 under later thi a bending month plan Election that I will go set for |