Show Addition In Candidates To EAGLE-ADVERTISER - (UTAH) October MURRAY luoridation LAKE SALT decisions ballot Three than the There feel confusion about Proposal A become the long a latest supplies The proposal fluorides of medications supplies state duly a derivatives compounds or other water any stipulates vote luoridation has with procedure recall by the election petition a proven total of most cases an outline of the proposal would concede When placed on the ballot in of several for been communities An defeated exception fluorides where added number have the to of for The a State position supplies It’s entirely not fluorides of the A so Proposal though even made controversial it would the fluoridation issue time any following the opponents could include many water chlorine of supplies could water in disease epidemic experiences before was places as chlorination widely used” many was opposition been quoted A Proposal could by approval of a that through procedure the marked Those will serve to the retain not Is On The by lengths those to parading judged Treats all you’re' receipts hunting help Green and help looking or Try is believe for ’em Utah LOW BOYS by JACKETS for To: $500 Address 2 still and years City $1 State for 2 3 - lare-leg over denim 10-oz shell Of face percent cotton of acrylic back 100 percent Machine washable es AT from cotton-poly Salt East Lake 900 City Wiw 100 sizes 32 long Red 46 boot money grain leather BOOTS warmest IMhmm to market liner lash felt serves as 'em rH 21 i I cold wet Utah 2197 choice $8” WINDOW SHADES MAC 84105 material leg styling Sizes 27 to 36 a comfort! style RANCH eyelet Your r one and cushion sole Steel 1 shank lined 54 sole 11-6 rich fur with two-way collar hand warmer pockets Deep quilted nylon hosiery cleated Boys sizes Men's shell warm and down fill REG '"J $5995 12 OZ Reg 800 NOW ONLY 1 6950 ffMl LU Xn jt INTERIOR SEMI LUSTER 1 $495jga $4 CANS SPRAY I AV"? 7-12 REG jPj i Handsome thick insulation foam ILLED JACKETS with 11 LADIES DOWN PACS 7197 AND MENS INSULATED to style at 65J THERMAL Nine s 660 NO styles nd 1 $1 -20 25 WITH It ENAMEL stain the I Choose aluminum from jT bar QQC OO and chain SEMI GLOSS LATEX LAT or and bar handle ALLIED'S PRICE yet weighs only Automatic oiling of chain fingertip master grip controls 1 orange colors or in exterior I 1 r-ich suited L’emiluster £95 wood or metal CHOICE 69c REG995 $8 for ceiling cabinets woodwork e- — and In choice your J 0 choice surfaces Jt YOUR finish walls dirt Household fingerprints and wash off in a jiffy! Wide color washable stain-resistant etc finishes to A finish interior woodwork walls 10-inch chain pounds 85 McCulloch's brake! blue interior pink yellow red and with for I CHAIN BRAKE 72" wide rom 24" to colors assorted and patterns Hurry for best selection! or percent pre-washed cotton Rich style CHOICE 100 PAINT famous 484-2290 pockets weave in 14 col BOOTS tested CHAINSAWS Equipped or Wrangler's basket new Double belt lare loops in YOUR to all-weather They're (rear) 7 slim 9" AND pre for say! 532-2696 Sizes front 8” price! MINI and band zipper or in Ll "HERMAN" ladle: comfortably SAVINGS! wide in years) South ii green 6" 7194 orl decorators Phone 1 Men's Wear the in material styled tan Navy Zlgallil k They're degrees thet Wool insulator PACS rub-ber on denim A IVSillors I: I 8" CANADIAN boot neoprene1 built and MEN'S ull ( brown hi $12” n The for with rust AiSBatnB JEANS percent pre-washed Dorsey sleeve WEAVE BASKET sleeveless in W your square ARRIVED! i neck turtle Nan polyester PARACHUTE More and neck I COMBAT Turtle mock x Siz JUST JEANS Ji blue brown to GIRLS styling Navy and LEG LARE mat-erials poly- 1 ALLIED back 924 CARTON to: your and Zip $749 ROUND 500 100 Choose 4-5-6 the laudatory of blended tan while of cord jeans iT get Magazine STore-Age i SPORT zwSIWl JEANS b'1' ANTASTIC with RILE CARTRIDGES m TOPS I w REG subscribing send Just Name HL MENS money? my action LADIES WRANGLER I Magazine Tore-Age HOW? ($9 for LONG selling J135” KIDS ood? Quality most OUT IND H S S E Buy I the S Store I 22 America's shotgun $1751 do is best PRICE! LOW WRANGLER DENIM yau f do 5 $3 ALLIED'S longer How ‘ How EXPRESS if lUWLl sole r 4 REMINGTON ga barrel! 870 pump COMPARE Biltrite are 2 7Vt 6 govern of such a passage “stifle would proposition and in development growth” ads want I oim I KtANB°RM i undue control local legislation or trading Sheet SHOT Ityiningtoi government “exercising and H'1 -Golden shotgun 20 or plain BRASS SIZES: ment” buying or and ederal influence p "Wingmaster"® Model 11 spending” state opponents Most the conceding aim job can the are costume-attired renting selling “ to 1974 sharing revenue youngsters Whether HIGH 2 ’ Express The and state K the contention is of Utah “taxpayers afford this continued costumes l£ state in fiscal from from The pump recent in specifically that r 870 12 “risen grants-in-aid outstanding be scheduled to are to has 1976 MODEL SHELLS of the and be to that is two be SHOTGUN applied argument in wearing in figmington schedule expansion will prizes awarded given mall the be cannot ZCMI march EXPRESS GAUGE 12 the reduction adopted that the near that be surplus tax a WP 1 The 1982-83 for fiscal north to will money budget years period under the mall of REMINGTON ederal phased be unreasonably” get entrance Celebrants Shape Additionally stipulates budget parade at pm the inside fiscal also The pm will 6 Any P HSIA would 1977-78 proponents (riday) of participants of CHOICE 7 B none state 14th its SERVED! i of retirement and calls indebtedness to costume 6:30 at Cottonwood Merchants Assembly end B $915300000 The begin would would petition any will Assn sponsor annual Halloween parade tomorrow beginning of cap revenues Mall Mall at — financing to HOLLADAY way IRST Anv a perhaps all At Cottonwood Cx x annual fiscal with but Parade Tap 111 COME IRST have but passage spending out Halloween ill of states misun- many as gracRWra IT small too 5-year a state on “Against” quo I IT NEED argument budget ceiling fluorides status I the for two Its II 1 excessive 31 other I that open pro-and-con the V less a provision more impose medication marked will on of other any or “or” will addition prohibit much I I affords and are out EV the percentile have a low the requirement as as in proposed Utah one Proposal C is attracting as as issue point recall a ballot the election They Those voters retaliate Ballots Opponents required be county YOUR percentages chlorine rr o¥i opposed be time element might and serious lengthy water could out problems break while citizens are going this P w the public and to expense of normal disruption governmental processes In those event any the contend the an upon majority opposed office officials recall added be harassment to the in I HAVE DON'T B could might B public water of spokesman has Proponents of that in doors f i DON'T of Proposal of manner Proposal the days 60 now laws own is Passage feel proponents routine and will have no effect whatever state on procedures days five such from of which Utah’s supercede whom convening from abrupt It days decisions Court started democratic process in a method a measure ‘Removal retort WE YOU The be official to as mild 30 to months eliminate equirement i state state a argue supplies purification result I I his commonly-used-chlorine added public mH legislature removed fourth the the fell f be in after the ‘ M H unsatisfactory measure also prohibits “other medications” which II I T H office there simply that argue be should method some through which an that is the years in ederal 15 not the for could six from and is matter from 21 to 18 of residency with previously-adopted voting con-sitution line in constitution the the state ones is Proponents of parallel A of and months six petitions the 1 effectively decide concern matter has which Murray case percent 12 legislator Utah in the been exception existing state lower the a last could had ballot time to the of to bring to of of the the in until holder sour- age IV designed language 2 MALUM muMMPKfN South 262-641 for at local circulated recently Senate defeated a public proposal to fluoridate water for ederal from comes maintain increase order in programs” Comparatively money Article Section by officials Petitions been water years percent its fact in taxes Utahns contend amend percent 10 officials county of would their would the in cast election state City leas at question in previous has it Brigham be would office for signed votes “but C Proposal of save opponents money” ederal is revenue or for result a voters of amount in as be two-thirds percent stipulated calls proposal special it voters the of 95 where “any reason including reasons” The registered unpopular highways the elected for wouldn’t by monies Similarly welfare would program imperiled since more than the Interstate of which was political to supply that is State on of could whatsoever or medications” Voters from officer recall its of 6419 any elected district appointed met is ederal create results “Passage of Transportation of budget frequently mentioned C could Proposal problem funds percent 47 Department the as A make either point system Nearly be extensive actually only to appear they’re 1976 28 alterations I use B recall appointed the add to any or they school the their to officer electoral could proposal a affected the funds well dovetailed budgets could catastrophic but operations the or reject Proposal ballot would possible or election affected area approve “fluorine any water from constituted the in ederal be would out state Age On Tuesday While water to ratify to public county or municipal A majority of voters sources at public to of needs been many have make to state of absence which have into be will fluorides voters Tuesday’s it other whether add Initiative the or add to specifically compound If elected the of prohibit would addition of water language confrontation Voting still quarrel in the only Not of fluorides would proposal be but only permissable if the State Board of Health it’s as version not to supplies Initiative statewide fluoride about is inasmuch not or other any there that argument shrinking dollars as a result inflation and continuing as out point is illegal it docket Observers words the ballot What on is voted whether on amendment voting other whether fluorides proposed constitutional sup- Budget opposition growing In initiative a is water spokesmen who’ll three and The fluorides in to added Recall plies offices are the being have implications to petitions on four Tuesday’s individuals elected result derstand could future more be with next on will Utahns confronted be Thursday SMv - — 7- of or f z -rv REG795 g I |