Show I- : ? 4! ft' $ k if A' I t ‘£j I $ i4 u Untenable Position Taken by ADVERTISEMENT Bishop - - J? - ‘f- - fc -‘H - ' I ? f ” 3 f "'I h 1 t '?4- i' v h t 11 r dpaldmg— - 4 -- Arguments His -ri Ventilated 1 e ES tbi 3 ! 1 $ 4 X il PRESENTATION scholarly PALL x 1 j Tl ts l-'k Is i tt'is: - City Lake Salt 3 xvc cJAC5il v of m a the Right ‘ -niiLi -0 lOjJaiCLiiig’— Utah delivered “drys” in this the J’abernacle Lake Salt ‘a x u the in last AaASUOJ) argument in behalf of the Bishop Spalding is campaign an of caue rain ofscholarly attainments (reasonably ibest that be the ability presumed Anti-Liquor voters of Salt Lake on the 27thjo£ June Sale” experience his City it and has forth and put Utah to the records t “Against vote BUT the To' j defy salooxf if thn't said his the IT i ' 9 ? ft it his is argument applicable the to determine and issues stake at in this Bishop ofyhe that And from I sion aiiced jf of food any that the pointed like in How temperance next that out the upon in and base all by if ! the A interest impersorial reached Jnly is couldbe cx Bishop I fallacy self-evident - But W and’Clhr-iiegie ' and ' ’ sped i Would the assassination 3 ' either in $ of -combinations the increase i THE ACTS ii r I1: t’ j to spoil in i w 11 population! nnrl nr t fi’ninin liquor and tiye 1 legislative That ' third The would tablish in step in of the case be only “blind consumption than imore in spite of linnndin nf the kept’ if Ts — influences the for for under sake the infinitely the the the re then the liquor interests only nonnln is W0y by d-An well j ers I' It f prohifei- than ah ninety-Ijj form it is who varied product of same I Spalding’s argument of prohibition law-it a passage who mucn se : isp would known — f s- law W t s that recruited the children is AND? the children the in of itself act fathers I!irom who children have never the z ot Again Bishop It W” This BUSINESS A V vvr MEN’S ' £ I the whp men opinion minds Do right are you Spalding’s science alcphol the in small- human the to epn!-clusiyely has even is arguiwent proved system ABSTAINERS history of GREAT A and broad this to unqualified' which assertion conclusive is MAJORITY THE OR is and been only “They' answer: alcohol” for the STATISTICS less and And of the I no The criminal the record this who statistics of entered - You Ju abstain-jiters and : ofr — - I ' j- : Do from t 1 ’ Think The Soundness so a arrests ‘ the salooii? - ' less in not law! ' What drawn never no than uplift is “dry H in liquor of moral more bishop a record answer consumption !! JJ r 1 prohibit one no against ' mental trained without better CRIMINAL states fenses become total to ' from but' moth- prate argument no I opiriion of of ' iJrhe Bishop’s to - 1 V 1 1 11 0 L ASSOCIATION Views? ’: - " M- UTAH O ) Bl ' that cah it piiblic their NOT IJUliib drunkenness 1 ' logically but - shows Spalding xw well thinks needs states is declared that those who sincerely believe” that their personal liberty gives them the right to drink as they nlease are mistaken tVA UAI a j sounds is its detrimental is been BY “wet” judgmenti their ? MANUACTURERS have REUTED is wrong in of use that prohibition environment? character is prosperous “Why do not" cannot but reply: abstainers accomplish as much as the mod drinkers?” erate the the record that inally Bishop shows says true liquor in who use moderation sei doni of drunkards The physical and army the wrecks of which temperance orators wjks interests defy the the record the who man the total meretaking drink is WHO would char-r s a it like HAVE MOLDED THE IDEAS O THE WORLD WHO HAVE AGCOMPLISHED ITS UPLIT HAVE NOT BEEN TOTAL ! and and that modern that answer fact MEN admit the argument you be true an argument in favor of regulated saloon as an environment of citizens better for the unformed environment of lawbreakers 1 so-called Bishop liquor tigers” and the of bpaiding should argument that children hdt be unduly exposed to temptation is true in the abstract but as applied to the prohibition question is based the utterly false premise that the upon d if on not best is of it city ABj-STAINERS exerts If and Bishop of stage MINDS clearfly psychologists statement -fit 1 speech mold - The is of tftat area Manifestly of next It ) bene- - which and' of man : in right?” it j’ it? MASTER — w “Environment : that produced statement to the properly fhe with pace vast through enactments’ 1 p- has voted “dry” the business demand ’ll the : States in hasbeen and any derives both he no “right deprive Construed not are quantities est sufficient are justness of a principle scientists Bishop i -I that prove United - these the that DRUNK? it and who that noble history and sh possesses to - of of city statement the - Statistic - the true j meaning one peas--L kit’ I - ir the in fooli of — the of account you mind - j a the figure extent the The " CONSIDER : said with agree TEMPTATION way any ' ” by of time efficacy the y capital? NOW gigantic these of either or ustrati ons be cited but few luv-abiding destroy 4' killing equally to which not ’ il consider: but believe nunish- penalty was imposed for any residence taking the name of God howjj would $eBut conclusion the in speaker cited Rockefeller being the personification of the oil trusts the drunkards grown were from is fine a is have con ENVIRONMENT arc humanity $ The as was fundamental the cent per will : - that a ill that Bishop There l’f ' a for other is' that acter ALLACY This is reached of mile O the nine I SEL-EVIDENT This seventeen preserve i ii t have it 0 legislation through in lies INLUENCE rb-hibition a declara- argument hence law if and sense term LAKE CITY SALT from On is man what tell men laws accepted long is family and root severe church a caiftiot it — to of IS to “law no the game There a a demonstrate to instance land laws 'might evil andthe self-evident his liquor the unfair approved is step corporation a moderation” construed prohibition meaning! very in drink of wife his and It the of sense a neglect word the of sense pleasure Next Bishop Spalding declares that a individual can get drunk and imagine an wrong and unjust when there were the on the Many vain of use moral kind this 3 and forsmoking buildinga fire ghat to as the palpably for as rabbit a owned i to the sairie the wise no at institutions” and were America when but temperance The is ypvho well-al- temperance drink of lies they combination no govern England was a time offensesl against the law death in question wrong— common that within believe or argument As conlu- the The itneeds books to in by feint is but wrong or statute “customs of point! And that laws 4 Jable 1 sober-minded most Out thing good temperance otherwise tion deduced lnly the it’ attain to inbetween there word the best a women and temperance illogically is was is witn capacity to think apparent wide a gulf between temperance and as as abuse in the what do ij?here eiect the to are principle case in is right matter on and $hany it is there be he and men anyone K this prohibition admitted that is statement hot? is that It : - issue at first believes everyone question whole campaign abstract law the or £ grow essential of construction you plac is It that no please” true defined well are cases man ih the WRONG? an the lit PROHIBITION Spalding’s as to whether whatgex-tent to regu-J laws That there cover legally a but J when applicable z- VS men are conduct to men who do who would the upon in man has a “right’’ to debauch himself and voted community any OR true science TEMPERANCE license been upon the HIMSEL DEBAUCH TO depends solely the words “as ' Quite es-j examine a liquor : RIGHT !4 have many of the speakers who have poused the “dry” cause No doubt to use hispwn phrase he “sincerely believed” all the statements he Left and all the he ‘made conclusions reached us as i sell by out ’ -casrntj f not section that has and sections the or and in borne Bishop Sphlding declared of customs arid institutions and preservation of liberty out : he RIGHT Tljat states tese giyfen be rlated argument was eminently fair and unimpassioned h did from his viewpoint He did not call names fear denounce not silly nor indulge in invective or I NO Next Snaldincr Bishon of NOT statement state laijjf the A ! any In never ? MISINORMED credit of dry”! rtirg- in fallacy Another may represent to uduOR INTERESTS LAW BREAKERS 1 AIR Up?” f a exposition league the ing and that Dressed - -it Sunday and hiT ‘ On - “Drunk J I'- PSET— B V -a I ACTS— KNOCKED UlJT BY THEORETICAL VIRTUE VS CHARACTER A LAtS 1 I f r I ' i ! — 908-11 Boston Building ' ’ - y fe?l |