Show mining suit against railroad officials 0 the w following item regarding suit of ff the wv deleware ff mining co jaff vs the salt lake fillmore w kanosh railway 7 appeared irwy in a re v cent issue of the iw provo sw herald w v in the case of the deleware Dele 0 waie J mining ff company against the ww salt lake fillmore kanosh F railroad ff company a corporation and the fol low ng directors named Siet in 3 the 7 com ff plaint george W craig v president y I 1 D 7 1 a cimball vice president A V robison secretary alva w nelson WWW treasurer 1 l and ff the following tSi iV diorec tors george shw E robison G J car penter W L biersach Bler y sach and W S ff Me Cornick a Is AV being held 0 in the ri fourth asar district court 2 b afore A B morgan ja w the ay complaint sets forth aff that the gintic tintic deleware mining company wy fi paid the said bwy railroad company t or their agents bufe the sum of 5 for the jal purpose of surveying and 77 con strutting ting a railroad s from T ZW lynndall Lynn azy dyll in millard y wai county to aw deseret moun I 1 tain a distance of about twenty five miles the complaint sets forth that defendants have W not constructed any part w of said railroad or surveyed any part a of same jg they further sv that afa said wf railroad a company www was not fully and completely financed as represented to them Af and that veyA said road w as to 7 ua have been completed by ff the day of november 1918 con plaint further jf states js that V the said 5 was not used for the as con ss its truc W tion or wf surveying sirve ying jaff of KV the first 7 in le of said railroad or or any parc of the same wrea but instead nasr tv Wis used for the printing of bonds and other in www ci dental J expenses the complaint further alleges that said corporation aag a Eg aver a had r any right of way and therefore vw said 5 was obtained fraudulently r ay and prays for judge t w mert against said corporation ww aff the directors aff of ame in the ez e z sum 7 of 0 y ife the defendants set up in W their answer about as follows y the above complaint does wy not p state facts suf s f tent for a cause of action second that several causes of action 7 W have beai improperly united aa the answer part of yaw the allegations such as the fact i that the awas vw 5 as was paid over to the heber bank and that 7 all fe the men named except george biff viff W craig F D kimball and A V robt son are directors of said aa railroad company george W craig 6 was iway prest dent of the diw company a until ff the ath day of september www 1918 and after that date W L ff biersach Bler sach became ig 7 president that A j V robison never was a director aa of said company the answer further recites that all expenditures of a the jaff company were w for i legitimate purposes of the cor horation po 17 ration that saw plaintiff t had full knowledge of all agreements and that the only 7 reason that said railroad w was not built was because of reasons wholly afi beyond the afar control wf ar of said g company that said corporation was y organized byaw for the purpose of build w ing said a railroad and that said cor horation po ration ia was Ww trying yAw now to build said road |