Show THE EUREKA REPORTER issued every friday at eureka th metropolis of the great tintic gintic mining district C E HUISH editor and manager subscription price 2 50 per year in advance throughout hout the length and breadth jt f the bumped states newspapers and magazines are crying out against the iner increase ase in crime and especially in the number of murders and the blame for this condition is placed and right rightly lyso so upon the judiciary for its fail ire to bung abut the punish punishment mant of the guilty ones it e find one lev le level v ea beaded headed man up tip n the bench it seems that there are a score of others who ara are willing to play right into tb the e bands of the legal frat fraternity ernitS in making possible all kinds of delays which not mean an increased burned upon the tax panels butin bat in nine cases case sout out of ten result resul tin in freeing treeing men who have absolutely no business to bo at lare L extract from the supreme court decision in the astaldi case the district court committed a grevious grevi grev oue icus error in holding that it had not acquired jurisdiction of the case and in entering judgment dismissing dib missing the action 11 another extract we are also of the opinion chat in this case the author it of the stenographer to act sufficiently appears in the transcript of the testimony and proceed filed by him it itis is made to appear thai that before the stenographer was permitted to take the testimony ony and pro ce edings in shorthand the magistrate administered to him an oath that he would execute the matters be was required to d with fidelity after taking this oath he proceeded and continued to act with at least the tho apparent con e nt of the magistrate the prosecuting attorney and the defendant and his counsel in this connection itis it is also true that upon a motion made mad ebythe by the defendant 0 o be admitted to bail and d se sch arged from custody he availed himself of the bransc apt as containing an authentic record of the evidence taken and proceedings had at the prel examination upon the corn plaint filed against him the defendant thu recognized the transcript as authentic so far as beneficial to himself but sought to assail it bo far as it might be used as contemplated by the statute by virtue of which it was taken |