Show College of Eastern Utah College Of Eastern Utah Library Price Utah Th Eagl “Volum XVIII Number Vole Jli Of Th PrlcT Ut MSOf Thursday? Dcembr Student 2 1 9931 CEU Debate is first in the nation by Renee Pressett team West Washington U has used all six of their countable tournaments while CEU has oily counted three Traditionally universities receive higher rankings because staff writer Who knows what debaters do They're a strange breed of people who talk fast and cany big boxes What ever it is that they do the College of Eastern Utah debate team does it better than anyone in the nation In the Nov 10 ranking by the Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) CEU was ranked first in the United States among all colleges and universities CEDA rankings are much like the rankings compiled for sports teams CEU has compiled 74 points at three tournaments CEU receives points for the top two teams at their six best tournaments One point is awarded for each winning debate ballot Ties are broken by counting the number of elimination rounds each team has won The second place mented “It is incredibly rare for a junior college to list in the top ten As far as I know this is the first time a junior college to place first Our number me ranking may be hard to maintain but with the students we have we can pull it off" Pullan said that the difference between this year's team and past yean is successful recruiting and hard wok Assistant coach Rich Hill commented "I'm not suprised All the kids are geniuses They came before school started and have worked hard Ibis yean team is comprised of incredible talent" CEU placed fust in the junior college division and in the Rocky Mountain Region The closest junior college to CEU is EL Camino College in California at sixteenth place their juniors and seniors can compete as opposed to sophomores and freshmen at junior colleges Larger universities also have the advantage of larger budgets and staff Coach Scott Pullan com- - Studentsuspension lyjartn Jng staff writei des)Noto Tw6 of dw men Enoch: Davis mid Ray G and Conduct Committee JreamgJ case oo the suspension of a CEU student! Star a Mi comM from the leant by coach Ronnie: Stnbbs due to viola wascancelledeartyTuesday i$ ana fur hearill information Evolved in aPSuons of team rules and home! — mffito tniru suspect Richardson appealed his and was to face the Standards and Ipeosion S v' X’aivv aw Committee macml Suitcase filed w CEUadmiruP s aI1" in the beartng was ady ised by those in her: V therefore cancelling the hear MtOrthcsidcotMklA! wMV M irWINS jy jn NM IStuden ts Jay Andrus wcre unable to comment on the nagainstthestudent Igrbds of lednt andthesuspensionwaa hftw Ipios Richardson waselatedof i CGrtl ''X the nearly threewemwis itfuanted ajCEU student carlyTuesday rooroing?Tyc been accused private matters involving studentslMMii However due to the strange circumstances those vv'vX'A XW rt'Iv'A'X v which prevented the witness to tesufy m the hearing yyy vv y vy'Ay i could lead u a bearing at a later date whereas an exv ' wx::xva i v could take place if the schoof pulsion of Richardson va aww Ay deems neccessaryaCEUadroinis&ator said? ' XvXva vX' yy IL1 Ly Finer to the appeal process Richardson was ofn the dean of y withdrawn from school through vXs A Va'v v'v'Xv' Student life and director ofcampus police during hiS - J1 vyI:X- wrpnglyandnowfyegottowalkarwindwithmy i' Xv y y y‘ because now everyone knows who I am reputation xvxv v vas vvv ss ': fm not mad at those who were against me every' one makes mistakes in jw)gememrRi still going w wane around wth my head up and smiling being the person ialways am" Rfcbardsoa saidl V' A'V' IvtfAAitAi' in wlv rHC( vltyjlUl OH JN0V:: IX investigation fato the charges of alleged rape SvilOCAItCfaUOft ' Xv'w: AXyA- X'XX AX XXVAt When the charges iwerec Richardsonwasali led to the suspension of Rkdiardsonandrwo v wWvwK y'X AW wvvVvwv for his classes lowed to other CEU students came to a stand sull shonly afiPlLater thatevenmg C Tvi Johnson visited Rtcharasoa nt txxufAU criminal enaigeswerectroppeobycaii gave him a letter signed bythc deanoft tomey QeneStrate after tbethree men x- - va-- : Xs y- v- A - v"' : X’'X' x- :X‘ : AT ‘a- V 1 j XvX’vX'a-X- A’ ”Xv A ' - - 1I72 homsisthe max awmttmeaiiowMiw ‘ er school ag Iwhlch released him from a x x x- - jwwv (s9uspnionpagg): Proposed changes for instructor evaluation by Anna Adair news editor During the last three weeks of every quarter a division secretary enten classrooms with an arm load of teacher evaluation forms Students are asked to evaluate their instructor on their teaching performance This is one of the existing evaluative tools at the College of Eastern Utah It acdone companies a evaluainstructor the and an by tion by the chairman in their division The CEU faculty association has proposed a new faculty evaluation procedure that will be used in conjunction with the existing evaluative tools Faculty President Michelle Fleck said the new procedure will take the place of “anonymous forms" Each teacher is given a questionnaire and the name of an instructor They are asked to do evaluations of each other Fleck was not pleased with the "anonymous forms" stating that instructors "don't get a chance to see each other teach The new way will help get us into each other's classrooms" The proposed procedure would be based on classroom observations by two committees Each committee will consist of four members two appointed by the self-evaluati- Humanities Division Chairman Brent Haddock and two by the Science Division Chairman Norman Larsen The committees will evaluate approximately 20 faculty members each year Instructors will be evaluated in their first third and fifth yean of e teaching at CEU Teachen who have received tenure a guarantee that their position is permanent will be evaluated on their 12th year of teaching and every five yean thereafter While observing classes evaluators will complete short forms on the instructor's classroom procedures They may also look at the course syllabus assignments exams and class records Committee membere are expected to make at least one visit to each of their assigned classrooms If an instructor scores low in this area the results from the other three evaluation methods will be compiled to determine whether or not action should be taken According to Fleck past evaluations haven't been very effective With the exception of the student forms there was no feedback and no help in changing for instructors With the new (s Evaluations paga 8) full-tim- |