| OCR Text |
Show The Paper That Dares To Take A Stand August 9, 1973 The UTAH Independent Page 9 Ecology For Profit and Control Defense Fund; and, $98,000 to the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund. Fords benevolence again was showered upon the Wave Hill Center in early 1972 with $150,000. In the fall of 1972 the Ford Foundation gave $2,000,000 to the Energy Policy Project to aid it in the creation of a national (federal) energy policy. This In 1969 the Avalon Foundation gave $75 POO to the Conservation Foundation and $30,000 to the Population Reference Bureau. The Andrew Mellon Foundation donated $300,000 to the Population Council in 1970, and in 1971 donated $15,000 to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. The Richard King Mellon' Foundation donated $400 POO to Ducks Unlimited in 1971, and is the chief backer of the Committee for Envi- year the Ford Foundation has continued its financing of radical environmentalism by giving $450,000 to the Population Council; $309,000 to Center for Law in the Public Interest; and, $162j000 to the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. The latter represents a three-yea- r grant to enable the Institute to study the role of oil companies in the energy market. Ford also gave $143,000 to the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund. Running a close second to Ford in promoting ecology propaganda are the Rockefeller foundations. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rockefeller Family Fund, are all contributing heavily to the environmental revolution from which Standard Oil is profiting so handsomely. In 1969 the Rockefeller Foundation donated $25U,000 to the Academy of National Sciences; $200,000 to the American Conservation Association; $60,000 to the National Audubon Society; and, $25,000 to the Conservation Fund. In 1970, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund gave $500,000 to the Population Council. The Rockefeller Foundation gave ecology grants of $10,000 to the New School for Social Research, and $10,000 to the Population Reference Bureau. In 1971, the Rockefeller Foundation gave $300 POO to Citizens for a Quieter City; $23,200 to Columbia University Center for Policy Research; $500,000 to the Conservation Foundation; $152j000 to the Environmental Law Institute; $50,000 in ecology funds to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and, $1,000,000 to the Population Council. In 1972, the Rockefeller Family Fund gave $10,000 to the National Resources Defense Council; and two grants, one for $17,750 and one for $25 POO, to the Sierra Club Legal ronmental Information, publishers of an ecology propaganda magazine called Environment. In 1972 the Andrew Mellon Foundation donated $50,000 to the Wave Hill Center for Environmental Studies and $300P00 to the Population Council. In addition to the Ford, Rockefeller, and Mellon Foundations, oil interests helping to finance the ecologists include the Gulf Oil Foundation; the Humble Companies Charitable Trust, the Mobil Foundation, and the Union Oil of California Foundation. Incredibly, the ecology lobbyists are being financed by automobile-relate- d industries giant firms profiting enorfrom ecology restrictions mously which have greatly reduced the gaso-line efficiency of your car. As for the role of Ford, what is the profit on all of that new federally required equipment? It rarely occurs to most people to ask who is profiting from such madness. Consider: Of aU the auto parts suppliers in the country, it appears that the Eaton Corporation is reaping the most benefits from this manipulation of government by the giant oil and auto industries. A multinational company operating in 22 countries, Eaton readied sales of over a billion dollars in 1972, and its profits are steadily climbing. Little wonder. Eaton just happens to hold major patents on both seat belts and air bags, is doing research on exhaust emission control systems, and is owner of a monorail company. Thanks to the federal government, Eaton has a guaranteed annual income from the sale of seat belts and air bags. But thats not all the government has done for Eaton. According to Duns magazine of March 1973, it has also been given a boost by 05HA. Says Duns : For months now, the nation's manufacturing vice presidents have been wearing long faces. The reason for their gloom: mounting production Occosts induced by the Health and Act of cupational Safety 1970. For most companies, OSHA is a four-lettword that spells billions of dollars in increased costs as production lines are redesigned, work schedules revised and safety installations put in. But for Alan Bethdl, OSHA is just what the doctor ordered. Bethdl is marketing director of Eaton Corp.s materials-handlin- g group." - Defense Fund. The Rockefeller Foun- dation donated $25,000 to MJ.T. for environmental studies, and the Rockedonated Fund Brothers feller ConservaAmerican the to $500,000 wide-rangi- tion Association. And, this year, the Rockefeller Foundation has given $500,000 to the Population Council and $25p00 to the Population Crisis Committee. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund has given S250P00 to the Population Council; $10,000 to the Population' Reference Bureau; another $500P00 to the Population Council; and, $25,000 to the Population Institute. The Mellon foundations have also been active in financing environmental movements. These consist of the Richard King Mellon Foundation, the Andrew Mellon Foundation, the Avalon Foundation, and the Old Dominion Foundation. ng er . Mr. Bethell is especially, pleased with OJSiLA.'s fork-li- ft truck regulations because, says Duns, ... it was Eaton's product specs that were among those adopted by the safety legislators when they drew up the So without having to go act .... SAVE and Continued From Page 3 through expensive product changes, assumption would afford as Eaton is already tooled up and ready much moral justification for his to go with its product line. Someone in Washington is looking robbery as does a like out for Eaton's welfare. For Eaton, assumption, on the part of the Big Brother is a fairy godmother. government, for taking a mans This should come as no surprise. In property without his consent. . The Eaton Yale and 1963, merged with government's pretence of Towne Incorporated, a move encourprotecting him, as an equivalent for the taxation, affords no aged by the late Herbert G. Wellington, a Yale and Towne director. Weljustification. It is for himself to desired have comhis had to lington decide whether he desires such pany brought under what he termed protection as the government an umbrella" partnership. Business . offers him. If he does not desire Week for May 28, 1966, reported: To it, or does not bargain for it, the Kuhn, Loeb and Co., went the job of government has no more right aware of setting up the umbrella than any other insurance Eaton's interest in diversification, it company to impose it upon him, brought the two companies together. or make him pay for it. Of course Eaton's present chairTrial by the country, and no man, Edward Mandell deWindt, is a certified Establishment internationalist taxation without consent, were bosses like the the of Ford, the two pillars of English liberty, just Rockefeller, Mellon, and other founda(when England had any liberty,) tions which receive their income from and the first principles of the the giant multinational corporations. Common Law. They mutually World Speaking at the sustain each other; and neither Trade Conference in Chicago on Febcan stand without the other. ruary 25, 1971 , Mr. deWindt declared: Without both, no people have in the next few years, the World any guaranty for their freedom; Company many with U.S. origins with both, no people can be could emerge as the strongest force for - Mid-Ameri- ca ... peace, progress and free enterprise sic in the history of mankind. The World Company, owned, managed and operated without regard to the physical, political and philosophical boundaries of nationalism can well become a reality in this century." AH too clearly, leading Establishment internationalists are using the ecology issue for their own fun and profit. You, of course, are their patsy. And their ecology con, the one by which they manipulate government to reap enormous profits at the expense of both your liberties and your is working. Your new car won't work, the price you pay for fuel is headed out of sight, and Big Brother is getting bigger and bigger. Meanwhile the masters of the giant international corporations admit openly that they are making plans to run the world without regard to physical, political and philosophical boundaries of nationalism. And, unless we Americans stop being such patsies, they one going pock-etboo- k, to make it. TIm Rwiaw Of Tha NEWS Pollution in The U.N. without taxation consent, mutually sustain each other, and can be sustained only by each other, for these reasons: 1. Juries would refuse to enforce a tax against a man who had never agreed to pay it. They would also protect men in forcibly resisting the collection of taxes to which they had never consented. Otherwise the jurors would authorize the government to tax themselves consent, would be without The American taxpayer has once again had his pockets picked to the tune of $40 million in the name of making the world safe from pollution. This recent United Nations volunteer handout by Congress to a U.N. Environmental Fund, came establish on the heels of Administration of funds and two ways, then, trial by the country would sustain the principle of no taxation without consent. 2. On the other hand, the principle of no taxation without consent would sustain the trial by the country, because men in general would hot consent to be taxed for the and would enforce impoundment vetoes of similar programs to benefit U.S. citizens. SURVIVE PERMA-PA-K cpFCIAL 341 East 2100 South inclined condone to the depredations of federal Internal Revenue agents, regardless of the protection rights under the First and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Here is the latest example: the Oasis night club in Baltimore was allegedly behind in paying its federal taxes. So the IRS conceived the idea of resorting to violent methods to collect allegedly delinquent taxes by hiring a professional The IRS hired Claud Singletry who was employed by a firm in engaged repairing and safes and vaults. Over servicing the protest of Oasis employees, one of whom went for a policeman, Singletry drilled open a door into the dub office. When a policeman arrived, the IRS agents convinced him everything was proper. So then safe-crack- er. Singletry drilled open two locked safes in the club office and broke open several locked boxes inside one of the safes. The agents removed some money and papers and the group departed. The Oasis sued Singletry's employer but the Federal District Court rejected the suit. It said the seizure of the clubs money and papers was legal and the IRS has the right to hire outside talent if necessary. No case was filed against the IRS, since the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the IRS has authority to seize assets of allegedly delinquent taxpayers by any means feasible. Several years ago the Senate on Judiciary Administrative Practices chaired by Senator Edward V. Long conducted a three year tax-raidi- ng Sub-Commit- tee (D-M- o) intensive Government non-sensiti- investigation of wiretapping by Government ve The agencies. investigation disclosed that the most flagrant illegal wiretapping perpetrator was the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The sub-commit- tee hearing brought to light dozens of illegal wiretapping and IRS burglary cases by agents. Amazingly, IRS personnel confessed their guilt but no prosecuting action was taken against them by the Justice Department. The Long subcommittee exposed the fact that the IRS maintained a lockpicking school in downtown Washington (on 12th street NW between F and G streets) where agent trainees ar instructed in the art of burglary. . House investigating committee chaired a Simultaneously, by Rep. Cornelius E. Gallagher conducted a investigation exposing the illicit wire-tappi- (D-N- J) ng electronic' surveillance conducted by the IRS. The IRS bureaucracy was infuriated. Congress Gallagher was charged, prosecuted and for income-ta- x evasion and sentenced to serve convicted three years in a federal prison. Despite intensive investigation and frame-u- p efforts the IRS was Continued on page 10 LUMBER ALADDIN LAMPS FOOEDLAM From The Washington Observer Most federal judges are STRIHGHAM LUMBER CO. 1 (Reg. $30.50) such taxation, and punish men for resisting such taxation, as the government ordered. 2. On the other hand, if the principle of no taxation without consent were broken down, trial by the country would fall with it, because the government, if it could tax people without their consent, would, of course, take enough of their money to enable it to employ all the force necessary for sustaining its own tribunals, (in the place of juries,) and carrying their decrees into execution. E $23.95 each their a thing which no jury likely to do. In these not secured. Thus these two principles mutually sustain each other. But, if either of these principles were broken down, the other would fall with it, and for these reasons: 1. If trial by the country were broken down, the principle of no taxation without consent would fall with it, because the government would then be able to tax the people without their consent, inasmuch as the legal tribunals would be mere tools of the government, We Feature fi otherwise than free. Trial by the country, and no support of a government under which trial by the country was ECONOMICAL FOOD STORAGE PROGRAMS IN 2 MONTH, 4 MONTH, 6 MONTH OR 12 MONTH ui Unleashed - OUR INTEREST IS IN HELPING FAMILIES PLAN READY-RESERV- IRS Taxation All Kinds & Sizes Paneling While Supply Lasts COMPLETE LINE OF BUILDING & HARDWARE NEEDS SURVIVAL LTD, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 3182 South Main Salt Lake City 467-26- 35 V (801) 484-446- 9 484-462- 1 a |
