OCR Text |
Show August. 18, 97? Continued from Page 2 Nowhere in the Statement of Candidacy does it obligate the candidate to vote for the slate of candidates, both statewide and nationally as was erroneously indicated by Wolthuis. If he is elected and reads bills as carelessly as he has read this, one wonders what will come of it. No doubt Joe Ferguson will be able to support a majority of the Republican candidates. It is certain that he will be able to support most of the Republican platform as adopted by the State Convention recently. The man whom Ferguson refuses to vote for is the man, Nixon, who has, himself, repudiated most of the principles and policies of the Republican Party as agreed upon in 1968. Joe Readers ytfOook removal from office) by assuming How to Z3 Continued from Page 2 bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. You have made a mockery of the American judicial system and more so of justice. You are worse than the criminal who prowls the streets at night. When you were appointed federal judge, you took an oath to uphold the United States Constitution. You violated that oath in the Grismore case, and therefore you should be impeached and required to stand trial for your criminal actions. May God have mercy on your nefarious soul. Arthur J. Hollo well Central Point, Oregon this power illegally. re-establi- sh constitutional law is another problem. The only solution I can think of is to file suit against every lawyer in the U.S., and specifically all the judges, and insist on trial by jury with the judges position blank. There is precedent for this, and it has been done before in unusual cases, and this is certainly an unusual case. I might suggest that it is to Mr. Grismores interest to do this as the barristers are not about to give up the power of determining law voluntarily. Name withheld by request A Slow Poisen Charles H. VanZandt Oroville, Calif. Patricia Garvin Medford, Oregon Richard K. Fox Medford, Oregon the AMA and Why should the ADA ignore the warnings of the chemists, scientists, and doctors that say that fluoride is a slow poison that will take 30 to 40 years to show harmful side effects? Why should we be forced to Find a way to help the children that need help. arsenic. But substances like nicotine took years to prove Drugs should be applied only when a problem is clearly identified. A suggestion: fluoridate the drinking water of the public and private schools which include the age group that needs this treatment. Salt Lake City - we agree with (Editors note Edith Willes. We do feel, however, that no person should be forced to drink fluoridated water, therefore even the drinking water of the schools should not be fluoridated thus forcing all children to especially, should not be tampered with in this regard.) Verbal Overkill Dear Sir: me, also saddened me. It carried no medical proof so many with it a message which I feel is smoked, even doctors. But important to all those who desire statistics were kept by doctors to be effective in fighting for a and now the doctors concur that righteous cause. The county commissioner and With reference to the obvious smoking many years may be miscarriage of justice in the harmful, even dangerous, and the zoning board held a hearing Grismore case I would like to that people should be warned. concerning a proposal which would make it illegal to conduct a make these points of law to the In the early 1960s the pill and particularly to for .women was introduced. My business on your own property judges size. Judge Anderson. I have very married daughter was told by a unless it were of a very small As my husband and I listened the U.S. doctor, Doctors do not know of carefully just to the comments made about the Constitution, and particularly any harm that the pill can do. the Article III having to do with My daughter has been unable to pros and cons of the issue the the judicial system. Nowhere in have a second child. Time and most important point seemed to be completely neglected. Perhaps that document is the right to statistics are proving the pill determine the law delegated to may have one of several side the other freedom lovers were the lower courts. Further in the effects, different for different only holding their peace and waiting, as we were. Tenth Amendment this right women. Tired of waiting for them to get The last issue of the Readers andor power is specifically reserved to the people (or to the Digest , August 1972, has an to the point, my husband raised his hand, was called upon, and States). In Article III the second article entitled, Warning: section, I find the right to May Be Dangerous to Your proceeded to request that they determine both fact and law on Health. Read it and tremble. How stop skirting the issue and get He spoke of appeal reserved to the Supreme many years have we been urged to down to cases. for this and that by freedom and the right of the Court, but only on appeal. have Further in the Seventh doctors and dentists? 30 or 40? individual to use his own property the way he desired. Amendment, in cases at Now, and for the past 10-2- 0 common law (which does NOT years, many medical men are Most of the people there agreed include criminal cases) the right telling us that there is no harm in with him and gave him enthufacts tried by a applause to let him know to forcing everyone to drink siastic they did. jury is specifically removed. fluoridated water. All of us thatThis must have been what they Thus I must conclude that the should risk this for the sake of right to determine law has been dental caries in certain aged Continued on Page 9 reserved to the people, and the children. Judge? re-re- ad X-Ra- ys X-ra- ys My Vote, My Conscience, and (Vie believe that without reservation I am morally responsible for my actions in government, whether it be voting for an individual or (if I am elected) for a particular law or bill. When a course of action that is right conflicts with one that is wrong but politically expedient, I plan to do what is right. While on a television show recently, a caller asked who I was going to vote for for president. I replied honestly that I plan to vote for American Party candidate John Schmitz. I plan to vote for John Schmitz because I believe in Constitutional government, and so does he. Schmitz would give us the type of government that Richard Nixon promised us in 1968, and that is the type of government the majority of Americans want. Socialism would make slaves of all of us, whether imposed by Democrats or Republicans. We have had more socialism imposed upon us by RMN than we had in the last four years of LBJ. Some of the Republicans blame this on the Democratic Congress and Senate. If so, then why dont the Republican senators and congressmen stand fast on the position advocated by RMN in 1968? The Democratic Party is controlled at practically all levels by socialists. And the Republican party is now controlled at the top levels by the same people. Whether President Nixon is unable to resist or is willingly pushing the party to the left is of little consequence to us. The result is the same. It will ruin the Republican Party if it continues. I dont plan to allow my party to be taken over without a fight. And there are millions of other Republicans just like me. Some say that a vote for Schmitz is a vote for McGovern. I say it is a positive vote for Americanism. If RMN loses this election, he can blame no one except himself. If he had kept his campaign promise of 1968, he would be by a landslide. There would be ' no American Party, because it is comprised mostly of Republicans who have been alienated by the Republican hierarchys fanatical determination to turn the party to the left. Im for a sound America and a sound Republican Party. Since socialism isnt sound, there is no place for it in America or the Republican Party. I stand firmly for the Constitution of the United States. Who Votes a Straight Ticket? My opponent seems to plan to make a big deal out of the fact that I plan to vote for John Schmitz. This indicates no little amount of hypocrisy. Did vote for Barry Goldwater in 1964? And Mr. Romney seems to enjoy the blessings of President Nixon and the Republican liberals. And if President Nixon can advocate, push, and sign into law old Democratic proposals such as revenue sharing, why cant I vote for John Schmitz? Next Week: WHO Bolted the Party? blind-who-will-not-- harmful. smoking was harmful. There was Candidate for United States Congress First District, Utah I Edith S. Willes A few months ago I observed a Starting in the 1920s men argued about whether or not situation which, while it thrilled Trial Without JOE H. FERGUSON future? How does man prove substances are poisonous to man? By trial and error. By keeping record of what and how much of a substance kills. Thus man avoids , On Course become the statistics for the drink it. Private schools, Dear Editor: Virginia Marks Medford, Oregon UTAH, INDEPENDENT Ferguson was faced with a dilemma. He either had to hold fast to the party and principles he believed in, or, for politics sake, follow the man who was violating them both. Fciguson has shown that he is a man of principle evenwhenhis party leader has deviated therefrom. Wolthuis, on the other hand, demonstrates a weakness here in that he will support the man rather than the principles. Or, it may be that his principles tell him that he should uphold the party leadership at all costs. If the latter is true it means his mind is geared to the mentality of the party politician. The Utah Independent feels that most of us are tired of party politicians who, when elected, turn a deaf car to those back home who elected them. After election, this type of politician becomes merely a rubber sump for his party leader. He will give him his support even if his leader makes a compact with the devil. With that kind of elected representative, where does that leave the people back home? The Utah Independent believes in voting for a man of principle , not of party. For that reason we support Joe II. Ferguson for Congress. fdjfoiOufjogk judges have entered into a state of bad behavior (cause for , .The see re-elect- ed , George-Romne- . y |