OCR Text |
Show I 785 Warranty Deeds to LEE BUTTERi'XELD ETUI STUART to Earl Kirk Hill etux 786 E Jerry 39 to ETUX 57 etux Roundy etux Johnson Jager 812 to to A LEE ENGLE ETUX Thompson etux Bl5 JESSE WARD 178 9li CONST to Isidore Garcia etal 838 DRUCILLA J POWELL SMITH to Drucilla J Powell Smith etal to Albert 8JUU DOUGLAS D DAVIS ETAL 212 to N LEWIS ETUX 853 DAVID J Keller etux 856 2142 LYNN D GODWIN 87U VERNON Jon ETUX to ETAL to Earl Alsop etux 882 R ANDERSEN ALMA Lynn 885 J RICHARD 2hS 893 JOSEPH A BEL J Mathew Behumin 89U J Carl 897 Kerr E Wallace 282 etux to L RADDON ETUX James to VERN L CHAPMAN ETUX Tony E Ortega etux 951 EARNEST E PAET8CH ETUX Asa to Scott Collines etux C Gilbert Lee Parker etux JOHN C HEATH to ETUX THOMAS L NEE HUM ETUX to James C Williamson 979 GAILAND REALTY & INS to Maddocks 983 WILLIAM etux DGXEY etux Laws 006 to 008 JOHN N STEWART to ETUX Brent Wiseman etux Oil ROBERT to Vincent Dale 025 CARL OHRAN R Treasure to INC 037 Richard G KIMBER ETUX Morris etux A 038 RICHARD A MORRIS ETUX Richard E Carter etux Olil JOHN L MCMILLAN ETUX Robert K Woolley OI18 ZELLA TRONE WILLIAMS to REUEL W HUNSAKER 06l D BUCKLE! JOSEPH Richard Brown 066 GLEN W ORVIN ETUX C Andersen etal 071 ELSIE LEBRUNER to Bruner etux 072 L BETH LARSON to 150 to Jay I3I4 PACKARD INC 1151 137 LYNDA to G to LTD James A Jensen to to 1152 David H BAGLEY GERALD to predecessor to the foregoing text authority was cited with approval by our Supreme Court in McCarrey v. Utah State The facts are very similar to the Teachers' Retirement Board. question here, and the decision appears to be controlling. In that case a retired school teacher claimed that a statutory amendment should have been construed to apply retroactively so as to entitle her to additional retirement benefits. She had retired before the enactment of the amendment which granted credit for schools. She had prior years of teaching in non-pub- lic such for in taught eighteen years schools, and brought suit in mandamus to compel the defendant board to credit her with that additional teaching time, and to raise her retirement payment accordingly. Our Supreme Court rejected her contention, holding that the amendment operated prospectively only and pointing out that the purpose of the teachers' retirement act was to attract and retain qualified teachers, and that amendments which increase LIMITED H BAGLEY GERALD PARTNERSHIP K the benefits thereby increase the inducement to teachers to continue to serve and the inducement to other persons to become LIMITED L Kenneth Christensen etux 151 Lynn K J Eugene to A SWAN AKA LYNDA Dennis J Tamara H BAGLEY GERALD to Myrthia Marie Jensen etux A JONES to Christensen to Earl JENSEN LTD H BAGLEY GERALD PARTNERSHIP to Christopher Alan Moren etux 136 MIRTH IA MARIE to & CONST REALTY LOW etux Ostler etux 077 J RICHARD ANDERSEN ETUX to Howard A Crittenden etux 121 PATSEY T CHAPMAN Zarbrock etux The to ETUX V WAYNE MUMFORD PARTNERSHIP ETAL Charles to ETUX etur Davis D Christens en to ETUX Lynn Barry etux PARTNERSHIP to by necessary implication or by unambiguously terms which permit no other meaning to be annexed to them, and which preclude all question in regard thereto, and leave no reasonable doubt thereof. etal Charles L Scott Jr etux lll5 PAUL J STEINFELDT ETUX to John W Reese hh? unequivocally, unmistakably, explicitly, positively, and shown B WILLARD SPENCER SNOW ETUX JU27 LAT to etux James F Webb Dean Robert F James etux lil5 FREE ENTERPRISES to David R Nielson etux to ETUX to DEAN B NORBERG Sperry lill to Harold F Wilkinson etux 057 101 retrospectively, intent. . In strict rule of construction against a retrospective operation, and indulge in the presumption that the legislature intended statutes, or amendments thereof, enacted by it, to operate prospectively only, and not retroactively. However, a contrary determination will be made where the intention of the legislature to make the statute retroactive is stated in express terms, or is clearly, Crockett etux. D I4O6 RICHARD L HADLEY David Darling etux WARREN Ronald thus: determining such intent courts observe a to EDITH VAN VALKENBURG it The question whether a statute operates or prospectively, is one of legislative Sue to Brian Johnson etux to Elton PECK CAMOMILE ETAL B to Peterson etux J OMAN to Albert B WILLIAM 103 K ETUX Lynn Ray Camomile 03li WILMUTH E DADDOW ETUX Robert Gordon 392 etux W expresses to ETUX 382 LLILLIAN S TIMOTHY W to to to ETUX SLC de- Certain former public safety employees, now retired, stress that the legislature intended to benefit those already retired and those who may yet retire prior to the effective date of the act, as well as those who retire thereafter. The problem is that if that was the legislature's intention, it failed to choose language clearly so stating, and a clear statement of retroactive effect is required. The author, at 73 A.J. 2d, Statutes, Sec. 350, Curia etux Builders Home D GRUNEWALD ETU) prospectively rather than retrospectively unless expressly' clared otherwise.4 CONTINENTAL REALTY & CONST 378 Bailey etux KEY CONSTRUCTION 031 Wilson 033 JANE JR M DUBBELMAN to John to ETAL W DUREN GERALD Norberg Jerry Lovato etux to Blaine Nicholson etux V 9 Farrell v. Pingree, 5 Utah 443, 16 P. 843 (1888). that that statute applies to amendments to existing statutes, and reiterated the rule that legislative enactments operate . HAIGH 3U0 FREDDIE Raymond Session), S.B. Davidson v. Love, Mont. (1953), 264 P. 2d 705. Salisbury etux A Chap. 20, Laws of Utah , 1974 (Budget " to etux F Richard Nelson etux 375 to Joe GARCIA ETAL B Etta Butterfield Larry Kent Ludlow etux SADIE to to MEHDI MARASHI ETUX 37b D Eugene Lloyd Fnocchio etux 993 RICHARD NELSON CANNON ETUX to John Bennion Cannon etux 995 BILL LEE MAHR ETUX to Lamar W Lindsay etux 60U 005 CHOWARD ALVEY & SONS. CONST 68-3- -3, Eldorado Inc T 1 Edwin 357 MYRON R HOLBERT ETUX Homer S Ellsworth etux to TERRY L GRAHAM ETUX 990 ' to Elroy LAYTON to BELL MOUNTAIN CORP Wallace R Stevens etux 312 SPECK CONSTRUCTION 1 of the amending Act1 states to Gracious 355 MAX DELORE JEPPSON The Housing Authority to ETUX N DUNLOP to 3 If it, is unmistakable that an act was intended to operate retrospectively, that intention is controlling as to the interpretation of the statute, even though it is not expressly so stated.2 On the other hand, it is a well settled rule of statutory construction that statutes are prospective in operation unless specifically stated to be otherwise by the legislature. 3 Sec. U.C.A. 1953, codifies that rule in this language: "No part of these revised statutes is retroactive, unless expressly so declared" . Our Supreme Court, in a 1944 case, expressly held to David 310 to Joseph William Dunlop 985 A A TRUST to ARLEN FOX ETUX 601 978 W Miller etux Robert Vanrelco Inc John DAVID B UDY ETUX 336 MAUD V COLES A Haigh etal 338 ALLEN W HOLT to GENE M BALZER ETUX 973 292 33 No. social security offset provided in this act is abolished. The cost of such elimination shall be shared equally between the employer and the employee. 326 JOHN RULON ORWIN ETUX to George H Jensen etux 328 EDWARD S PRICE ETUX to Robert J McNally Jr etux 953 MILTON CRAIG GILES ETUX to Jimmy Spencer Lipdorff etux ETUX 955 .JOHN A HOLLINGSWORTH 957 Udy etux Phillip to White etux T BERDIE E HEATH 298 Mary Allred etux 603 9Ul 291 Homes 5 Nelson 936 LARRY E Campbell Const 0 Answer: The C WILLIAM H MELLONIE ETUX Living to Merva CONSTRUCTION A Hugh 291; to S Duehlmeier etux 93li JAMES T PEACE ETUX Henry to Barksdale etux W Does an amendment to the Utah Public Safety Retirement Act which increases the benefits payable to those retiring after January 1, 1975, the effective date of the Act, apply also to the benefits payable to those who have retired or will retire before the effective date of the Act? to S CANNON MIDWEST Question t to ' aulson Bruce Vernon B. Romney, Attorney General K. Roger Bean, Assistant Attorney General By i Sec. " etux ROGER 280 Prepared to Bros Inv 270 MARY 917 GEORGE FORD FAIRBOURN to George Ford Fairbourn etal 92h S TAYLffi? SMITH ETUX m James to to ETUX B CORDOVA E Adams to to Theodore Walter Scharrier etux 909 JOSEPH GRUBE to Arvllle Charles Corbridge 268 LAVERNE M SNARR to Wahlen to IEPEREN D VAN MARIANNE Gordon E' CRYSTAL ETUX T Connole etux Louis 267 RICHARD CRAIG BURGESS ETUX 261 to MATHEW BEHUMIN ETUX to UNITED BOND AND FIN L Brakey etux DAVID GRANT GILMORE ETUX 256 Dale Ainge C ETUX VENNE GRUBE Walter Fredrick Phillip Turner etux ' HEINZ KARL 251 ETUX ANDERSEN to Karl El wood Johnson etux etal Andersen C C HOLT ETUX 2hh KARL HEINZ Rees etux Gary Lee Wymore etux 858 JERRI YOUNG INC to American Heritage Builders Socorro fieins Grube to ETUX N NOVELL ROBERT to Norman tux Levin Savage to JUAN S CASTRO Leonard McDonald, Executive Director Utah State Retirement Office to G MICHAEL ALDER ETUX 221 Requested Byt to CHRIS TENSEN CONST Valdes etux Coon etux to etux Jay Hunsaker etux Stev e ns etux 8I48 THOMAS L ALLRED J GRANT to ETUX Willoughby 811 TWENTIETH CENTURY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Lynn April 17, 1974 Kingsley E Claws on etux 198 BLAKE HEIGHTS CORP to Midwest Realty & Fin 199 MIDWEST REALTY & FIN to Dennis A Coates etux 205 KENNETH PULLAN ETUX to Joy Fin to alias 74-0- 17 to KIRTON LAND AND INV 191 R L YERGENSEN Dennis F Andersen to 628 LEAMON C MCINELLT ETAL Reed P Ness en etux 832 DORIS B CHRISTENSON D Kirton Land 179 E Lynn Neils on etux C OPINION NO. H Bagley etux WILLIAM SHIRLEY EREKSON ETUX Wilford Hansen etux C HOWARD ALVE7 & SONS to Joseph to LYMAN ETUX GORDON Gerald Arthur ETUX ORWIN United Bond and 822 165 0 0 DAN C SIMONS ETUX 803 to Jay T FENTON ETUX BURTON Office of the Attorney General State of Utah Jesus Church Warburton etux E 702 GUILLERMO JARAMILLO ETUX to Thomas M Mumford etux 802 EMMA 0 REESE to Mildred R INC MONROC hrist ! T BOATWRIGHT HAROLD MONDAY, APRIL 22, 1174 INTERMOUNTAIN COMMERCIAL RECORD PAGE FOURTEEN Halpin etux to Fern JAMES D HOOPES ETUX In re Ingraham's Estate, 106 Utah 337, 148 P. 2d 340. Black li59 TERRY WILLIAM to Gerald I16I PAUL D I HOWICK Morley etux NIXON JR ETUX ETUX Security Title, Tr ll69 CORNELIA A.AOYAMA 111 Utah 251, 177 P. 2d 725,(1947) The court observed that to Clyde B Hendricks on etux 163 ALFRED J OLSON ETUX to teachers. , to. Rick to 182 ADRIAN JOHN SCHOUTEN ETUX Dan T Olsen etux L A CAMPBELL Blacks Sharp Title CONST etux I48I4 L A CAMPBELL CONST Howard Wayne Farmer to etux provisions of the Lorin same did not amendment under consideration it appears the not unmindful of retroactive effect. Sec. 2, although apparently making no change in the law, adjusts retirement allowances so as to apply to those who retired before legislature to and Abs Paul the to those previously retired, and found reasoning no clearly manifested intent of the legislature to apply the amendment retroactively. In this connection, it is worth noting that from the other apply Price Watters etux li75 5 July 1, payment was 1969, but fixes a commencement shall not be re.troacti w. Thus date and states that the the absence of a nrn- - |