OCR Text |
Show THI PAGE FOUI ttCORB DAILY WEDNESDAY, JANUARY New Actions Murray City Court, X In The Supreme Court Of The State Of Utah Brian Humpnries, Platntiff and Respondent, 62751; Knight Adjustment Bur eau -- vs- ROSEMARY AUHICJC; 962 Vest 4800 So. 1 $87.00; ser- - No. 13345 FILED January 8, 1974 v. L. M. Cummings, Clerk - Dee -- vs- Dee -- VS- -- vs- DA VIES ; JERRY A. Credit Enforcement Bureau, Inc. -- vs- ANDY FANOS , Utah State Fair Trades Comm. E. 4th So.; $113.5 to 33 Pltf.; Interstate Collection !. So. 2nd East B $348.15 to pltf.; Jan k, 1974 ALBERT Interstate Collection 62524; -- vs. STATE S!?,INT, KACillHE; 3o. statoj vh&.i open acct; ii, c. Vcrhaarcn, otty 27V3 ic 17, 1973 Valley WAYNE iilLrj::ix).m-- ; .'62745; ilnpiro '.MLl. 2:iTI mm. Co. -- VS- Staple Co. MTIAVAY xw.KK,:t dba :i & & . -- va JAKXF. .joof- - Bank I'. ft DIANE DWIGIIT pltf.; GAIL L 1237 So. bad check 17, 1973 h Trust & SUE 76l.Jso. J. 1700 ' 363-20-60 So.; $272.69 to 1974 ft V. 54 97 364-31- 86 8 3 to So. 41"C Jan pltf.; 7 B. fa MARY EAKINS 4634 V. 3855 So. ; $56.86 to Jsn 7, 1974 JAMES pltf.; vs. interstate Collection PAMELA . MATTHEWS I 435 Clubs 532-82- 80 7635 to pltf.; pltf. Clubs 46 WRICO ENGINEERING 70 W. Truman Ave Engineers 30 WILLIAMS s. ENGINEERING 300 812 S. 900 Tax return ing, -vs- -JACK atty; Deo 18, 1973 62749; 1. H. Dig 0 Tire L'. IIAAGCE; 97 Gardenia Midvale; $72.00; bad Dr., cheeks; L. Bishop, atty; Dso 18, 1973 GAYLE 62750; Knight Adjustment Bur eau -- vs- JOHN 0. SPXKER; 3500 Emigration Canyon; $230.65; open 000 aeet; T. 10, 1973 P. Vuyk, atty ?W. preparation 48- 5- 2642 Electric Contractors 486- AWAY INC. State Drpr - 2921 ft R BLOCK 2601 S. State Tax return preapartion interstate Collection so.; $322.34 to Jan 4, 1974 62733; Security Adjustment Bureau, Inc. -- vs- PETE fc SANDRA . PEARSON ELECTRIC 1381 S. Ma n 268-40- 11 NATIONAL MECHANICAL CO. 450 W. 3440 S. Plumbing Evans Supply Inc JOOSt lb8 So. 3010 V. $7537l open aeet; R, J. Carl industrial Professional Tax Service H So., Sandy; $14.44 Jan 4, 1974 388 E. 4140 6278j PRODUCTS W. 359-82-21 13203 S. CARL W. ft LEE ANN WATSON Pltf.; , 571-53- 40 Interstate Collection W. GATE 8 V. 200 S. MORGAN DRIVE MIKE L JANE DOE MACE: 5 B'. Designers Interstate Collect ion 62653; 200 W. 262-93- Jan pltf. ; DODGE; 31 6 ALIGHNtfEOT? WATERGATE 3986 LINDA REPAIR ft AUTO 520 s. 300 W. Auto repair 466-81- Jan 7, 1974 62605; credit Enforcement Dureau, Inc. -- vs- BURKE S. LILA SORENSON; . RAMUS; 3687 Lee )iaur, Granger; $148.59 to 5 electric Genreators WATER 6th Ave.; $5.17 to Jan 4, 1974 )1j3.3&; charge agreement; v. Fillmore, atty; Dec 18, j, 1973 pltf 6259; Interstate Collection 462689; stty; 62747 ; $97.11 to nr.; Appleton -- vs- JUAN SUPPLY W. 5585 S. 320 333 LYNN D. ALL RED; Jan 7, 194 New Actions Murray City Court dba CHARLEEN fc WILKIE; 3375 -- vs- Grainger's Karket 83 TOMS 62521; U. C. A. 1953. ft CAiiOt K. I'ARSONS; 3rd nost 1); $2.85; Doe 3. Slash, 266-32- 162391 ; R. L. Tuckett, Justice ,lo-buil- Trolley Sqmare Restaurants SAN --vs- CUPBOARD 340 pltf.; Jan 8, 1974 62680; -- vs- State x return preaparation T V. 8125 So Jordan; $157.69 to V. 626831 ifa7hk'. Factory Vacuum -- vsjo.'; Id.Widl.'O 156 JOYCE FRISBY: Chief Justice 462716'; Lyle Grainger dba BLOCK 53207227 -- VS- att R 4122 S. CREPERIE 62607; credit Enforcement Bureau, Inc. -- vs- DENNIS !. Ver-haar- en, 262-61- 76 H ft 62385; Credit Enforcement Bureau, Inc. -- vs- WARREN & m m 378 South 3 8 '.est; $324,88; open acct; II. C. atty; Deo 17, 1973 ft R BLOCK 4833 Highland Dr. Tax return preparation 1974 J. Allan Crockett, Justice Ario way, Sandy; $16.39; open acct; a. J. Carting, uoe 17, 1973 COMBS 62079; credit Enforcement Bureau, Inc. -- vs- DOUGLAS KXNGBURY; 8th East 172( So. D; $364.00 to pltf.; Jan 3, nt INC; 272-01- 12 H Jan 7, 1974 pltf.; BLOCK 2120 S. 900 E. Tax rebrn preparation 404 Carrie Dr.; $72.51 to -- 365 E. b ft R H 456l Vest KYRNA BLOCK 487-07- 67 DA VIES Interstate Collection 61783; ft R 7065 S. State Mdvl Tax return preparation Jan 7, 197 -- VS- 31 255-32- H So.; $251. 00 to pltf.; 578 t Distributing TAX SERVICE 2022 S. Main Bntfl Tan retrun preparation b VIRGINIA STANLEY RAY I LILLIAN ,. CilAHAII; 295-85- 74 6l529 ; Central Collections Inc. A. H. Ellett, Justice HEAM Goods POL EXECUTIVE pltf.; -- vs- -- vs- CENTER State Sproting FEDERICO; 422 Lambourne Ave. $42.51 to Aug 1, 1973 1974 62743; .llchards 18, 1973 RAY FEDERICO Vest; $99.9 Co. SPORTING 6100 S. 61034; iiary S. Fletcher dba WE CONCUR : 8, P Certified Collection Service seem to have been proper. 38-1-1- -- 266-06- 89 JERRYS Murray City Court The defendant in a motion asked that in the event judgment prevailed here, the defendant be ordered to remove the lien. The record, as is, does not permit of us entertaining such request, but 4. Title scooters repairs Judgments f 19691. Jr., 317 S. 300 W. Motor Cycles ft Motor B. PORTER, Jr. L 724 So. Uth atty; FOR CYCLES Interstate Collection ROBERT Vuyk, As to 3): Defendant takes the position that attorney's fees are not awardable in the absence of statute or express agreement or perhaps in punitive damage cases. The plaintiff in this case alleged in his complaint the filing for record of a mechanic's lien in Iron County, where the construction took place, but did not ask for its foreclosure, - for the reason, no doubt, that he could not have pursued such a remedy in Washington County, local forum in this case. It appears that defendant's point in this respect is well taken, since plaintiff's only claim for attorney's fees is based on a statute4 that does not apply in this case. The judgment for attorney's fees is reversed, and the remainder affirmed. E. R. Callister, HONDA JOHNS CUSTOM PAINT East; $634.00; open aeet; T. As to 2) above; The motion to submit the matter to arbitration came after judgment which was too late, - arbitration being designed to prevent litigation, - not to create more controversy in a brand new forum, with a brand new approach, with virtually a brand new trial, - which no doubt are solid reasons that gave rise to the almost universal rule that arbitration is ' not permissible after judgment. "A sworn statement in 1. Webster's Third New International Dictionary: before an authorised on affirmation oath or under writing made especially " magistrate or officer. 2. Minute Entry: ". . . Jim R. Scarth appearing for plaintiff, no appearance of defendant or counsel for same. " m 532-81- 07 ELENA BURR; PHYLLIS PORTER; . would 19 V. S. Temple 18, 1973 62754; . post-judgme- t ROBERT K. 27 532-35- GENEALOGICAL INSTITUTE so. 2670 Vest; $728.71 services; t. P. Vuyk,atty have examined the comparatively short record and it appears that each of the three affidavits filed by defendant which were urged in support of this point on appeal is ineffective and conceded at argument by defendant's counsel not to be probatively responsive under Rule 56(e), Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. With respect to the answers to interrogatories incorporated by reference in one of the affidavits, we think that such interrogatories in this case, part of the pleadings, substantively create no genuine issue, since they, like the affidavits do not satisfy either the Rule or general rules of evidence as to admissibility. Under the Rule, even the interrogatories would not pass muster here. Certainly the answers to interrogatories would be subject to the rules of evidence on summary judgment. Being sworn to, they also come within Counsel for defendant at no time respondthe definition of "Affidavit."1 ed in person to defend his position on this point at any regularly scheduled hearing incident to the motion for summary judgment. He failed so2 to He respond after notice, on February 27th and 28th at such a hearing. aside own the to 13 set motion his to argue judgment, failed to appear on April even on notice given by Scarth for a hearing, nor did he appear at a hearing on July 13 having to do with an exception to the sureties on his appeal bond. Under the same circumstances on a motion for judgment by default, one hardly could complain if such judgment were granted. 171 JULZA A. 2908 We 1 BUSINESSMEN: Update your telephone .directory with the following new business telephone installations. Published as a public service in cooperation with Mountain Bell. Interstate Collection 62753; Defendant urges on appeal that: 1) There was a genuine issue of fact developed by the pleadings and discovery process; 2) That the matter should have been submitted to arbitration under one of the terms of the contract; and 3) That attorney's fees should not have been awarded. 3. 25 A. T.. R. 3d ' aka JULIE KING; II63 So. 3rd East; $723.4 ; servioes; T. P. Vuyk, atty; Dee 18,' 197J The only questions here are: 1) How many bricks were laid?, the price per brick being conceded; and 2) Are attorney's fees recoverable? it JULIAN C. costs awarded. 1: Telephones KING Appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff after he had recorded a mechanic's lien, for an alleged balance due on a contract to lay bricks at a housing project. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. As to Business Interstate Collection 62752; -- VS- HENRIOD. Justice; No T, 1973 18, ' Remco, Inc., a Utah. corporation, Defendant and Appellant. P. Vuyk, atty; Dee vices; 18, 1974 BATHEMISS; hot 1842 E. 17th So. she! 7O55 campus Dr. $482.64 to pltf. Jan 7, 1974 486-27- contractors 77 NANCE STANLEY B CO. 1931 S. 1100 E. Oil ft gas exploration ment ft develop 62742; Construction Special ties Co. G & M -- vs- GRANT ENTERPRISES; HILLS 264 Sandy; $198.97 dba Roub-ldo- ux, to Jan 7, 1974 pltf 6273;, Richards Distributing -- vs- Co. Aria DEAN GRAHAM; Way,' Pltf.; jan 365 E Sandy; $17.45 to 7, 1974 582-88- 26 ARGO LTD 875 Dormer Way 114 Exporters 486-32- 22 BROADWAY GARAGE 231 W. Haven Ave Parking stations ft garages |