OCR Text |
Show I""' J Hi" '.Mil 1 " ' POORtCOPY miss? . FRIDAY, APRIL 28, 1972 City Courl Judyments Suits District Court 44 V)7 - Bonded Adjustment WILLIAM BARKER V.1! n.uPGK 15c Pltf$114.24; $12.30; 426 - ctl v input. Cicdlt Atjt.y v.t UKLViN GRONPAlIL; i4.0U; $1.56; $10.60 ritf 424 44484, - R. C. All red vs BROOKS P. HARMAN AND NADINE HARMAN rUf$277.66; 426. 44564 - vs DON W. Cndene ROBINS; W. 205256 - Licho Sanchez vs Pltf R. K. Larr-m-i Fl.tf5617,40 FPICSON; $10.20; 42l6 C. Pltf$610.85 MCKEE; $9.90; 426 44317 - Boyd Fitzgerald, vs lit C$323.48 CAROL 'IJRIM'IAIL; $10.30; 426 4330) Hi v f u II. Keller vs I.D Tec. Natim-a- l A - Credit 1 $8.20 Pltt'$27.3l; MCGUIRE; $50.00; 426 42582 - $1,000.00; $1,000; $1,000; pers Injury Granite Sheet Metal D. ROBERT $10,0.00; ALLEN INDUSTRIES, Pltf$500,000.00; $50,000.00 205262 - Margie R. n DREWS; vis ARNOLD 44101 vs ION 6937- - 1,1 ft a ' ' i Eilcii Davis - ! 1 a .I.JI..;- Janice l.oui :t :n D. JenktP-- 1,110,11 ! 69jii DAVID $350.00; J. B. Weber WAGSTAFF; 424 Pltf su vu KlehoJis : 6939 - .t-i- O - : i 6933 - Wilma N. Huud vs Lee Hood - J llansci, NUl'-jll- '! " 6940 . -- Kivor-i i . I llelga Kirschm j am Joba a! u: -, - Ai.u Cepe 69 VI !!. - - KcnretL .mull i pn ' Jenui tc-- Robert - 69V, ; ' ,i:tili3 Uir ii'i . M iri i .,'ul iuu Ur". ttobei t Lilian av l E. fiiLin v. , vs U'l'oiy v' r, Jr. oyj llaii!, eu ! i ) 942 Divorces Filed re Fanin'i' I. - - Beverly ni lirrd.i a). . , f. I. Karim. 424 vends Lee O Very Alan Barry fH".i lyin'. Joi jei1 ..ii-ot- t i i , 1 V.s r-- i ri t Im' In The Supreme v vmla i .. )u . ''..Aii UrriJ.; . Anri Ci m b Of Utah David William DeBry, IMalntiff and Reft?- - Pltf $50.00; auto $1,394.90; $695.60; $246.90; 426 Taylor C. GANDEE, SR; CLYDE 1' 1 MAI R AND VERLEEN vs United Park City Mines, gam; $78.42; garn judg 6934 205260 - J. W. Brewer Tire Co. vs BOB EGELUND; Pltf $966.75; bal due 44152 - Gale Lcaimn V i Vs! Pltf$101.00 $20.50; $50.00; 426 ?!. - Supreme Food Corpnvs agreement DESIGN ASSOC; COMPREHENSIVE DBA DON EARL JR. Pltf$54.71 gnm judg 424 vs INC; 205261 - Johnson Ready Mix vs RICHARD RODRIGUEZ; Pltf $1,276.34; bal due VS Bolinder M. JUDITH AND ORCHARD ORCHARD H. A. IV OF UTAH; AND. UN LELAND LATHAM, 1ATHAM vs 186608 damages 205259 - Stephen D. Orchard and Larry Regis, Jr. vs MEL- VIN C. - Vern etux vs MAIR Pltf YOUNG; $7,606.78; Ksl1.' f 204572 - Fairfax Family Fund Inc. vs GEORGE M. HOWARD AND BETH 0. HOWARD ; Pltf$534.47 $150.00; $32.00; 424 "i 0 .f Leon. i 'ip 09 55 - i.LrJ-- r J 199953 LESLIE 205258 - Intermountain Theatres Inc. vs MAX ROACH AND . 44318 - Gregory II. Clear vs CLYDE Pltf JR; ' 196397 Pltf 205257 - Boyce R. Clark and Clark Tank Lines, Inc. vs Larson and Mrs vs MRS. CORA R. E. Pltf $100.00; $1153.87; $810.00; '3 ) Judgments LEE LOVINGER, 44594 - Higgins $900.00; $25,000; pers Injury 426 $112.00; $7,00; JR, Pltf$317; $879.52; $228.21; $76. ?n DBA FKLl.KK FREEZER CO; Kt.LLF.R Jose ' tv ' IK;.:: Kay DIAN FULLMER, 424 - can--i- ' J GrcrtUiti hk-tree- f" 204476 - Supreme Foods Co vs ALMON D. FULLMER, JR. AN note 205255 vs CLARK hi vote District Court Judgments 205254 - First Thrift & Ln Co. vs DEVOTA MCCARTY AND BRENT LEE PHILLIPS; Pltf $1,097.09; $322.88; bal on JOHN FRANK MONTOYA; Zuber F.ng.i U. F. CA.ir.kFC'lRO THE v. damages Safeway Stores, Inc - TUf R, ERICSSON; $ $46.74. 512.00; District Court Judgments 75.00 420 Jarie Wilson DeBry, Defendant aivl Apj'i-i- , CL iii i 203945 - Michael John Bailey - 4389-- vs Martin loliti .clha STEVE Martin's Market vs BELL DBA RESIDENTIAL CONST. CO; $ 135.27 ; R. - COML Pltf$2,000; partial summary. judg 419 Pit 510.60; $59.52 ; 426 PAPPAS DENNTS AND JAMES- KENT Robert. F. Ireare 44553 dba rob"s Auto & Truck vs DONALD P PNAPD; Pltf S35.O0 $9.50; $25.00; 426 CONST- SKYLINE OF WYO. RUCTION CO. Pltf 421 $6,440.21; 'fhe appellant, herpinaffr bf waiver in tin- - original divui.c: uu-- .. default judgment was grariti .. v ! husband, wherein Ihe 'i ,ii' i.,iy In- ktt five wm. About a ii ihe was ivi'ilc aiie stipulalion. still interdedte ... r i nei-Jlb.locutory, th? wife moved t pPTrrt i lftr to file an answer and Juu i ead or y .... in sign it under a understand the stipulation and was ir false promise to drop the div-i. 184118 - Davidson Lumber Sales, Inc. vs ELLETT. Justice; -' 43896 4623 - Nonna Beverly Barber John Mart In dba Martins Market vs ROY MORROW PI i f $??. 54 ; $11.20; $50.00 4 2t vs ARNOLD GLENN piir-'i;-- - BARBER - M- - f f s-- - - . -- . i;,-- : - Pltf$3,084.50; $14.50; 421 . ; AT 9 :t: : Martin's Market Pltf n'-PCZ- ; 187360 - Melvin Church vs i vu U.NO 17. 57; $7,60 A $0.00, 426 Sojits District Court 205246 - Gerald R. Uaynes - Rnr.FRlO ! $2,210.00; note 205247 - Union Corpn vs First Thrift AND LOUISE BENSON D. KENNETH Pltf BENSON; ' $979.00; $250.00; agreement 205249 - Skaggs Employees Cr Union vs SUSAN M. GILES AKA SUSAN BERT AND RONALD M. $330. Pltf$l, 103.20; GILES; note Pltf$300.00 poss. of property 424 GUARANTY and CO; K1 Radio vs ub-K- CORPS AND CO. OF AMERICA DISTRIBUTING FI Lf AND APA ADVERTISING; DEVELOPMENT ha $1,140.65; I due No cause of Action; judg on verdict, Bernice M. Phillips, foreman 204020 - Bridgers & Paxton vs ARBOGAST, JONES, THKISS ASSOC; Pltf$2,068.00; $240.00; $30.00; 424 .203081 - Pilgrim Agency vs JUNIOR Collection CHRISTEN- D. Pltf$1 ,515.47; SEN; 424 $28.80 Pltf CHRISTENSEN; leil dur; $1,092.00; & $332.00 205252 - Security Adjustment P.i.ireau,l nc. vs RAYMOND L. . PRICE AND SANDE PRICE RAYMOND L. TRICE AKA MRS. AKA SANDRA Meredith aka sandra brinchur-ST- ; Pltf$1 .779.31 ; $22.24 $503.15; Sandra) $188. 54 $1.66;$208.00; $34.98; $86.00 i. 'Sandralaccount - George S. Kinney and MARCIK CANDI-LARIO- CANUELARIO AND HERMAN PlLf$l, 091.78 ; $) 16,33; bal due, note RADIAL TIRES WISE PERFORMANCE 325 PIEItrONT 521-03- or TIRES 34 SALT LAKE CITT $583.33 Pltf$2, 500.00; $12.30; 424 The stipulation ami de- - v althovEii . i I ful ltL'iii "e ihe custody of (heir support and ... the two minor children and that th-rniinie nance the-- sum of $j9 per n provided that if he. would tn-- to $118 per mouth, he wo i. The decree awArded llic iiin it uriiil she remarries or nuiii whichever first occurs. trial - decree further v t, . ' - i' amountlntr payment, i- - h-- iv! right to li vj; age of ?.l. It thus appears that in following thi. stipulation the court rnay have abused his discretion, for in awarding the ii.ortgagtd home to the husband he, which should have permitted his equity therein to be augmeiii fd with m been made available for the. support cf tj e children. No provision is made for the husband to make any conlnuti-.-lh r:iior ' f.hildren except to furnish a roof over their heads. By : lit n:-- r.-f- iin- huii.'id increases his own wealth each lime lie makes a ..ymcid n lien of support payme.r.!.. ! i.- - . innr-t.ji:;.- - Where little children are involved, the court is nut obligated to adopt or follow a stipulation of the parties ; .'iii.li nut adequately provide for the care and welfare of the childrcr.. In a .V , e p,.;ary concern of the court is the welfare of. the minor childruji, and the court should carefully scrutinize any agreement belween parties wJiicb miftl.t tuil to affect adversely that welfare. wi-ui- 704017 - 199328 Tronic Precision El FRED PEARL; $27.60; $1,729.52; Pltf 424 - Ray L. Denison vs ANN BARBARA Pltf OSBORNE; $1,089.88; 424 - Edward Snow and Snow Cherie by their Gdn Donald Snow vs LINDA LEE 202929 HARDY; Pltf 424 $10, 000; 204067 - Earl ALVIN C. DALLIN ; HORNE C. Laughlin v AND MABEL Pltf$885.00; C. $100. Horne; A24 175592 - Lawrence E. Thatcher vs WASATCH CHEMICAL CO; Pltf$4,000; Winston L. Thatcher vs CO;, WHEN YOU NEED Call Dan RUPP AND DOUG MCAFFEE against Alvin 205253 - First ThrLft A Loan Co. vs JftSF, CANOETARJO, '11d Hie '.i. . 203613 Inc. vs &' 20,5251 - Gordon C. Holt JUNIOR vs Webber Sterling G. The pa.rties tesiifiycl fully ii judge thereafter denied the inotici, the wife devotes most of ho o. I: and the decree based upon it. 188964 - Robert Ilyberg vs RULON OLDHAM; Afton P. Kinney vs CLINT 705250 - DPX AND 421 Pltf DENTES ; FIDELITY UNITED STATES WASATCH CHEMICAL Pltfy$2,0(l0; 424 203557 - Calvin Johnson dba Johnson Collection Agency vs DENZEL R. DR MTLLE ; Ptf $903.80; $284.28; $24.60 420 204459 vs - University Hospital WILLIAM V'LLINCTON; $1,519.84; $28.50; 420 Pltf . . M l!-- At the time of the divorce the wife was unemployed, and it is difficult us to see the justice of the decree as made. for While this appeal is nut from the oiigi'nal doci le, yet wo think the failto ure make the husband support these ihitdren is su inherently unfair that the court should have set the decree aside of liis own motion and permitted an answer and counterclaim to be filed. We think this is no. though fhp court may have been justified under the evidence given at the hearing on the motion in finding that the wife had voluntarily signed the stipulation drawn up by the husband's lawyer. The husband has not seen fit i . l ; '. m' lo present his side of the case lo us. The tr;; of r!' '.v,ini to t.hc court fi at the default hearing has not been hrou;" brl cm. ..ju , ,ft. may not have the entire picture presented to us. liowccr, l'j w.iit is before us we jia feel that a full hearing should be had on the matter to determine the distribution of property, the amount of alimony if any, and the amount of support money which should be awarded. Keith ivv 'eerce of divorce set aside, and so that phase cf ihc : ! , . .. The i order denying the wile s uio.-jn.permit her to plead to the complaint i3 rcvrerd. for further proceetlJrurs iu u Vi4 . riit.HI J ! i.., ii..r default and to b" mn. tn it ' |