OCR Text |
Show . THE CITIZEN 14 in which this action is brought; otherwise within thirty days after service, and defend the above entitled action; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court This action is brought to re cover a judgment and decree quieting plain tiff's title to the property described in said complaint and described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot G, Block 73, Plat "A, Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence south 10 rods ; thence west 2 rods; thence north 10 rods; thence east 2 rods to the place of beginning, situated in Salt Lake County, State of Utah. interest Also: An undivided one-ha- lf in: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 73, Plat A," Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence south 10 rods; () thence esist 8 feet; thence north 10 rods; thence west 8 feet to the place of beginning, situated in Salt Lake County, State of Utah. STANLEY A. HANKS, P. O. Address 26 6, Attorney for Plaintiff. South Main Street, Boom Salt Lake City, Utah. On No. SUMMONS. cross-complai- nt of 11-11-1- 2-6 S. S. Sears. In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. W. II. Cromer, plaintiff, vs. S. S. Sears, Charles Boettcher, Mary E. Fcas-leLe Roy Teasley, Maud Peasley Goodman, formerly Maud Feasley, defendants. Summons No. 32436. DefendThe State of Utah to the said ants: Charles Boettcher, Mary E. Peasley,- LeRoy Peasley and Maud Peasley Goodman, formerly Maud Peasley. You are hereby summoned to aprear y, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county in which this action' is brought; otherwise, within thirty and defend the days after service, above entitled action; and in case of your failure so to do, Judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the cross complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of this court title to the property described quieting in his complaint, and the defendant, S. S. Sears, has brought his against the defendants Charles Boettcher, Mary E. Feasley, Le Roy to Peesley and Maud Peasley Goodman, obtain a decree quieting his title to the same property which is the west half of the northeast quarter of the southvvest quarter of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Meridian cross-complai- CYRUS G. nt GAJJfiLL, Attorney foi'T)efendant. S. S SKARS P. O. Address, 414 Atlas Block, Salt Lake City. Utah. J. 12-16-1- -13 II SU3IMONS. In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Lena Baldwin, plaintiff, vs. James R. Baldwin, defendant. Summons. The State of Utah to the said Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you. if served within the county in which this action is brought; otherwise, within thirty defend the days after service, and above entitled action; and in case of be your failure so to do, judgment will rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the pur-o- f securing a decree of divorce, dCDiiving and severing the bonds of and the marriage relation nr..imony tofore and now existing between the aboye named plaintiff and the above nan.ed defendant, and for other purposes as more fully appears by the complaint on file herein.& FOWLER. NEWTON. FOWLER for Plaintiff. Attorneys P. O. Address. 517-1- 8 Atlas Block. Silt Lake City, Utah. Case No. 43211. SUMMONS. In the City Court of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake county, State of Utah. Sandy City Bank, a Corporation, plaintifff, vs. Tom Radoumas, sometimes known as Tom Radoumis. and Mrs. Tom Radoumas. whose other and true name is to plaintiff unknown, defendants. Summons. The State of Utah to said Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within ten (10) days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county n which this action is brought; otherwise within twenty (20) days after such service, and defend the above entitled action; and in case of your failure to do so, the in this action will apply to plaintiff the court for the relief demanded in the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court and of which a copy is hereto annexed and herewith served upon you, and will take judgment against you according to the demand of said complaint. This action ishrought to recover a decreeing the plaintiff to judgment have an equitable mortgage upon the land described in said complaint and foreclosing said mortgage, and for such other relief us may be just in the premises. II. A. SMITH & SON, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Dated December 20, 1922. P. O. Address, 426 Ness Bldg., Salt Lake City, Utah. SUMMONS In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Stella Bunnell Kelly, plaintiff, vs. Harry J. Kelly, defendant. Summons No. 32916. The State of Utah to the said Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county in which this action is brought; otherwise, within thirty days after service, and defend the above entitled action; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant. POWERS. RITER & COWAN, SU31MONS. In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake City, State of Utah. John G. Linde, plaintiff, vs. Harmon Schnell, Julius Mackson. A. B. Currier, Minnie Currier, Edgar Merlck. and Dora Merick, defendants. Summons. The State of Utah to the said Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county in which this action is brought; otherwise, within thirty days after service, and defend the above entitled action; and in cage of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action Is prosecuted for the purpose of quieting the plaintiffs title in and to the property described in the complaint filed in above entitled action. D. C. KUNZ. U LORAINE BAGLEY. GAYLEN S. YOUNG, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 412 Templeton Bldg., Salt Lake City, Utah. Dated December 5, 1922. 12-9-1- for Plaintiff. Attorneys P. O. Address, 314 Kearns Bldg., Salt Lake City, Utah. 30 SU3IMONS. In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Pearl McDonald.1 plaintiff, vs. Donald Grant McDonald, defendant. Summons. The State of Utah to the said Defend- ant: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county In which this action is brought; otherwise, within thirty days after service, and defend the above entitled action; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant. HUTCHINSON & HUTCHINSON, Atorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, Atlas Block, Sait Lake City. Utah. -6 SUM.MONS. In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Inez P. Curran, plaintiff, vs. Robert D. Curran, defendant. Summons. The State of Utah to the said Defend- ant: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county in which this action is brought; otherwise within thirty days after service and defend the 512-13-- 12-16-1- above entitled action; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought to recover a of matjudgment dissolving the bonds between heretofore existing rimony you and the plaintiff and for the custody of the minor child, Kenneth Curran, the issue of said marriage. E. V. HIGGINS, for Plaintiff. Attorney O. Address: 4 Ness Bldg., I. Lake Utah. Salt City, In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Theo Smith, plaintiff, vs. May Smith, defendant. Summons. The State of Utah to the said Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this sum-moupon you, if served within the county in which this action is brought ; otherwise, within thirty days after service, and defend the above entitled action ; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought to recover judgment dissolving the marriage contract now and heretofore existing between you and the plaintiff. B. N. MATTHEWS, Attorney for Plaintiff. 409 Hooper Bldg., 23 East First South St.. Salt .Lake City, Utah. SUMMONS sn SU3I3IONS. De-ligiann- is, 67-100- ths ARTHUR E. MORETON, Plaintiffs Attorney. P. O. Address, 406 Judge Bldg., Salt Lake City, Utah. Dated December 14, 1922. , In the Justices Court in and for the Seventh Precinct, City of Sandy, County of Salt Lake, State of Utah. Before H. P. Johnson, Justice of the Peace. J. P. Jensen, plaintiff, vs. W. L. Garrison, defendant. Summons. The State of Utah to the Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear before the above entitled court within ten days after the service of this sum- -' mons upon you, if served within the county in which this action is brought; otherwise, within twenty days after this service, and defend the above entitled action brought against you to recover the sum of $278.08 for services rendered and goods, wares and merchandise sold and balance due on promissory note, and in case of your failure to do so. Judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint. Given under my hand this 5th day of September, RODGERS SUMMONS. In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Una F. Lehmann, plaintiff, vs. Reinhold August Lehmann, defendant. Summons. The State of Utah to the said Defend- ant: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county in which this action is brought; otherwise, within thirty days after service, and defend the above entitled action; and In case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought to dissolve the contract of marriage now existing between plaintiff and defendant. MORRIS & CALLTSTER, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 224 Kearns Bldg., Salt Lake City, Utah. 12-16-1- -6 SUMMONS. 219-22- City Court of Salt Lake City. Antonios Deligiannis and Nick doing business as Deligiannis Bros., plaintiffs, vs. Tom Radoumis, alias A. Retouvis, defendant. Summons. The State of Utah to said Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within ten (10) days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county in which this action is brought; otherwise within twenty (20) days after such service, and defend the above entitled action; and in case of your failure to do so, the in this action will apply to plaintiff the court for the relief demanded in the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, and will take judgment against you for the sum of Two hundred thirty and dollars (230.67) with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum since the 15th day of March, 1921, upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant; together with plaintiffs costs herein. 14 & pose of collecting the sum of $3431 together8 with Interest thereon at t rate of per cent per annum from a after the 15th day of July, 1921, un paid, due for goods, wares and me chandlse purchased, and will satisfy t) judgment out of the property now he under writ of attachment. ROBERT H. WALLIS Attorney for Plaintiff Judge Bldg.. Sa Lake City, Utah. P. O. Address, 219 12-23-- 1- SIIERIFFS SALE. In the District Court in and f Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Marjorie Moth Iversen as AdminL tratrix with will annexed of the esta of L. Moth Iversen, deceased, plaintif against Leslie I Goddard, Louise Goddard, George Romney Lumber Con pany, a corporation, and Agnes Drii coll Frazieh, Administratrix of the ei tate of Anna Margaret Rufi, decease Annie Margaret Frazier, Agnes Drii coll Frazier, (formerly Agnes Driscoll .Jacob Rufi, Emily Frazier, John Wi; liam Rufi and David Rufi, defendant' Agnes Driscoll Frazier, Admlnistratri' of the estate of Anna Margaret Ruf Annie Margaret Frazie; deceased, Driscoll Frazier, (formerl Agnes Agnes Driscoll), Jacob Rufi, Emil William Rufi and Davi Frazier, John s, Rufi, against Marjori Moth Iversen, Administratrix with wi annexed of the estate of L. Moth Iver 3 sen, deceased, Leslie L. Goddard, LouiB E. Goddard and George Romney Lum ber Company, a corporation, cross-d- e fendants, to be sold at sheriffs sal at the west front door of the count court house in the city and county 0 Salt Lake, State of Utah, on the 2m day of January, 1923, at 12 ocloc noon of said day, all the right, title claim and interest of said cross-dfendants, of, in and to the followini described .real property, Beginning at the northwest corner of lot 2. block 191, plat "D, Salt Lak City Survey, and running thence eas 165 feet; thence south 41 and feet thence west 165 feet; thence north 4L and feet to the place of beginning with all improvements there together on. Being in Salt Lake City, Salt Laki County, State of Utah. Purchase price payable in lawfu money of the United States. Dated at Salt Lake City, Utah, thi 5th day of December, 1922. C. FRANK EMERY, Sheriff of Salt Lake County, I ! cross-plaintiff- j : el to-w- it: State of Utah By F. M. Mathews, Deputy Sheriff. RICH & ROBERTS, s. Attorneys for Date of first- publication, December Cross-Plaintiff- 9, 1922. 12-9-12- DELINQUENT NOTICE. Mutual Metnl 31 lues Company. 2 Principal place of business, Ness Bldg., 28 West Second South, Salt Lake City, Utah. Notice. There are delinquent on the following described stock on account of assessment No. 7, levied on the 10th day of November, 1922, the several amounts set opposite the names of the respective stockholders, as fol201-21- lows: Cert. No. Name. Shares Amt. 1922. H. P. JOHNSON, Justice of the Peace. RODGERS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Sandy City, Utah. 12-2-12- -30 SUMMONS In the City Court In and for Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Western Credit Association, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. R. W. Spangler, and Mrs. W. R. Spangler, his wife, defendants. Summons. The State of Utah to the said Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, if served within the county In which this action is brought; otherwise, within thirty days after service, and defend the above entitled action; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the pur And in accordance with the law and an order of the board of directors, made on the 10th day of November, |