Show W THE OTHER SIDE county attorney truman boys no offense was 7 ne i 1902 to tl tt d tor of the VM ideis it fion the emery count Pr oRreis iesue of kiy 41 a so silt like issue june 1 that Y M county attorney 1 l e hin t imite loveless n math e mil M P heber leoer 1 beit westover S Loi eless nd D H leonard mixed up in one the ost eaul that 1 ia H int anton I 1 deem it to ie u keirnan t ft tho facts s vis during the of tt e trill ahe debei lints ere not hired disgraceful con luct dri 11 a mur der laicer or alval ng of that sort I 1 ut si ariy riy chirped disturb n tl e ahe ates at es diket sho vs or should chov tha folio t to I 1 0 trie 0 i div 29 the verc g ed ind ilesi lot guty to the ie that tho aeten leten lints hied an affidavit iski g foi i chine 0 venue the 1 i 1 i beju lice of the jusli e of tl e lil im ho rd i ich aade ed ihen th bushed to arm r to tl e cia plant thih too vaa denied court then took a rece s om 12 n to 1 i in during jhb inter val the justice or the attorney for the to not ce I 1 a cital defect in tho corn II 11 ot 1 amended it lo 10 suit their taste I 1 ut not in court nor the aco 01 gonei t of the ts when court coave od at 1 bolock the jubei eingorn eel the defend ts tl it the LO ha 1 been amended and that tie def vo H la e to aleid ginev to the imen ie 1 couil nt Vs this ia a precedent imp in crien all procedure roce dure the defendi its irked tl i e for consultation beford plea ling chich request like oti v a den ed and the aeten lants to trial ahe in the aboe atee sho d that the dints vere seen at geo M millers birn and that mr miller who prom a me u or of theton beirl i u there ith tl em there is not i single atness thit the to t on the stand atho test he th t coun attorney or i ot thi defend mile adv lo 10 lor so or tint the r LO due vas bid the question m in u ll 11 the mm Is of hit if an thing di 1 the jovn rove they roved th ind this ahat somebody pro tined and thit ody m lo 10 loud ind i 1 no se I 1 ut all of tho et ted thit the d d not k v who thit thi it tt e bount of the os lence that produced by the to the lants then ip n asked that the I 1 e d on the gro in that the tovo hid failed to connect the ith the offen chiarel alna re qi est ju tice ho aid said I 1 im 1 ke many of the in the mortin u n cise and la mide up and it vill t il e evi lence to chanso it the deafen lants offered no tebrin om chev thought it useless but the iud e found the abbie fai to bo omleto arr nt n convict ou except to H b loveless in 1 D H leoard h those ere 11 d the others con 1 acte 1 no ie k io s but himself the defendants have ari lied the cise thit they night t aie a fur and imi trial a d shou 1 the 1 aher court hold the lower cobit diethold thit berbon accused of i cr me u his annot innot ence vie are p to prove aid ull prove bovo d a reason al ie doul t that vac did r ot n nit cina offense i d tl it tte were not brunk as the person who arote the t cles in ahe an I 1 herald u id lead the t bel eve e anre un conscio is of h v in nin tte 1 any cr ine and believe tl is case to hive bi en instituted for oti er p noses than A M u IAN count attorney |