OCR Text |
Show HALD, Provo, Utah—Page 33 No-Panic Gas Plan Pressed ppsnine) ON (UPI jon of < mnere? 1 their ¢ public for eagues al the anti-panic’” plan to ns leave ars parked oneday a standby ure uced last the House and its sponsors held a jews conferencetoday to Whip up interest The bill would Enab ask for quire a oline purcha driver at service stations lt would prevent long lines to “top off” tanks with small amounts of gas USDA Choice Large End Require the president to set conservation targets for the states and require the states to draw up plans to meet such targets States that failed would come under the federal carless-day program. Cars would have a sticker for one day of the week and the driver could be fined for using the car on thatday. Turkey yam Hocks .. 89% paumsncxs. 39% c sizziEAN. A Roast. 59° 0A. Choice Beot SHORT RIBS... $139 BREASTS Fryer U.S.D.A Choice 7-Bone 1 Ib. Daily Delite G8 BREASTS... e Ss] 98 2.0... U,S.D.A Choice Boneless Ranch eareseeeseresteneress| 1b BQ . Rep. Toby Moffett, DConn,. said the combination of leaving cars at homeone day a week and reducing the number of visits to the service station “is an anti-panic device and a real serious conservation device.” He said estimates of what can be saved range from 200,000 to 250.000 barrels of oil a day. President Carter has already given governors. through an executive order last week, the Sirloin cut PORK 59 eee ‘ Center Cut Rib 7 Laas a aU bill being pushed by the Moffett group, such a movecould become man- datory if the president declared a national need for it Rep. Timothy Wirth. DColo., said Edgewater. Colo., already has a sticker plan that is “working well.’ Each car has a bumper sticker with the nameof one of the days of the week and cannot be driven on the ss S¥e oz. Lay's | JumboCoronetDelta GAR Sugar GRaNdLATED. sw. Regular BBQ 6 ae Sour Cream & Green Onion | aint”...63° porTarts.....67° crinceeos ... 85° scares -_ 85° 23 ib. No-Namne 2-3-3 Plus Iron Ss1499 48 0Z HEC Fiult 53° 3 Ib. Maxwell House DRINK DRINK................. 25 Ib. Honey Bee 56” BISQUICK Bisquick........ ........... 71%? 27 oz. Tang Orange Breakfast dese, 4 oz. Morton Beef, Chicken, turkey 150 count Glad Sandwich soreauen ay ' <a, 9 ci ane i CHIPS AR POTATO ; 02. Nalley's | 10 Ib. K High Court Reinstates Firearms Rule WASHINGTON (UPI) — The Supreme Court Mondayreinstated, on a 5-4 vote, a New York law that presumes firearms found in an automobile areillegally possessed by all the occupants unless one of them hasit on his person. This reversed a appeals court, struck down the “unconstitutional federal which law a3 on its =" ive case arias Gis 20 count Glad Family Pack aeeritefeat TRASH BAGS see York State Thruway. The officers found two loaded handgunsprotruding from the purse of a 16-year-old girl in the car, and charged her and three male occupants with illegal possession of the \\NECTAR RIN New ES BANANAS Dole ae, 6st New Crop California court's majority opinion chided the appeals court Fag 79° See CARROTS 39! APPLES .. °1 ASSORTED CACTUS CABRace........192 7 = SQUASH Tus Fresh Italian ing. saying there must be a solid connection, not just a presumption. linking the weaponstoall occupantsof the car. Justice John Paul Stevens. writing the high NO-NAMESPECIALS Ibs. for Cac Pot tm s $42 weapons All were convicted, and the three men challenged the law in federal court. A federal judge invalidated the statute, and the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that rul- 3 Lb. Cello Ba 5 Lb. Cello Ba: ORBAN GES OO SOON 59 ea WE WANT TO BEYOUR FAVORITE STORE. 79 for ruling the law unconStitutional, saying the presumption of possession was constitutional in this case Stevens said ‘‘the presumption of possession is entirely rational’ in these circumstances because the three men “werenot‘hitch-hikers or other casual passengers’’’ and the guns werein their plain view. Stevens said the trial judge in the case madeit clear in instructing the Jury that the presumption al possession was part of the prosecution's case ... rather than a mandatory conclusion of possession, and that it could be ignored by the jury even if there was noaffirmative proof offered by defendants in rebuttal.” 4 |