Show annexations FUTURE IS PAST the eastern papers seemed for a time to have generally come to the conclusion thit the union of utah and nevada would be a satisfactory settlement of what they are disposed to consider two vexing questions once in a while however the correspondents respondents our ento from washington pointed out the absurdities ties ot of the proposition and punctured the pretensions of those who by b y favoring the scheme think to give evidence of statesmanship latterly editorial opinion on the subject is also undergoing a change when take the time to look at the matter calmly they soo BOO i see how many difficulties are in the way ago as the alth lost the new york world was wait telo telegraphically graphically informed by its washington man that there was little prospect of the annexation scheme bobele going through delegate rawlins of this territory to is quoted as putting the case in the following pungent and unanswerable fashion such a bill could never pass congress for various reasons reasone in the first place the people of both the state and the territory are opposed to it ald my people especially are against it such a consolidation could not be made without the consent of the people ot nevada and they would never give their consent it would make a state sae 1000 miles wide and the only communication from one side aide to the other would be across a deben hundreds of miles wide |