Show ADMITTED TO BAIL the fhe slayer of peter anderson asked lor for bonds the examination into the charge of murder against richard Ric bard grant who shot peter anderson at park city on nov ad concluded yesterday the defendant told his own story of the shooting on the witness stand after giving an account of how he put anderson out of the saloon twice he said the third time anderson came in with a man from gerraty ivors ivers sta ble 1 his bis name was evanss anderson andersen asked for drink told him he could get all he be wanted outside and give him any I 1 again went brombe from behind toe the bar took hold of him and put him out he resisted and I 1 used force I 1 he placed his handsone baud haud sone on each side of the door and braced himself I 1 I 1 loosed his hold and he fell down he caught me by the legs I 1 loosed his hold on my legs and catch ing him by the legs up ended him hien out the door it much trouble no one helped me have put out lots oetter netter men when asked officer weber ask you if you wanted the man locked up and you tell him no that you had put him out three or four times and anc think he h would trouble you anymore any more witness said no prosecution sad sa d if that answer true then none of your testimony isis it witness became agitated and biant diant hardly know how to answer he finalle anally said it is true I 1 am on my oath the fourth time he came in was about three quarters of an hour a afterwards ter wards he came in mad slammed the door open towards the bar thought he was wai mad he looked like it he had a knife in ti i hind hand I 1 again ordered him out and told him to stay out he be go I 1 took a pistol froma from a nail and went around the end of the bar thinking the gun an would scare beare him he said you s of ab a b ill 1111 billyou kill you anyhow and started for me I 1 pulled on him but ehg gun snapped he kept kepi coming and I 1 pulled again the HUB guia went off eff but anderson kept coming thou thought git I 1 had bad missed him so pulled again had I 1 known the first shot struck him would not have fired second one did not see him raise his left ones hand han was about six or seven feet from me he walked to the door and fell out or on sidewalk the defense asked that grant be admitted in to bail and the prosecution insisted that the offense he had coi committed n was not a one police justice james who heard the case made the following order decided that the prisoner be held to await the action of the grand jury in the sum of the bonds to b be e subject to tue the approval of the court ot of the principal witnesses must furnish bonds for their appear appearance ande at the trial the action admitting the defendant to ball bail is severely commented on the park city call says this matter of taking human huma life on slight provocation is becoming a little too frequent quentin in park city and many of our re specter and honored citi citizens fens are ard beginning to 0 wonder where and when it will end it is no trifling matter and friendship and previous standing should not be al lowed to interfere and shield man or woman when the law has been outraged as it certainly has haa in the present case park city will soon be designated as a school of crime if something is not abot done to check the epidemic in relation to the liberty shown the prisoners by the authorities the article in last weeks record was to the point and expresses our views exactly grant should have been locked up and treated as his bis crime deserved instead of being allowed to roam the streets going whither his will dictated it is true ti ue he is in charge of an officer but when we realize that the same officer has had him in charge day and night without one single relief fur six days day and nights nights the officer bri business siness be comes what it r really lly is a farce pure and simple it cannot be success successfully fudy disputed an l all reasonable men must admit the truth of the assertion the above facts coupled with the attempt to hold a secret henring hearing of the case which but from prompt t and decided action would cromp have ave been victorious has thrown our citizens into a fit at of deep disgust from which they will not recover in a hurry and when the time lime comes I 1 will voice their sentiments for a different 5 tate state of affairs another thing thine that cannot be denied aud and which the public freely admits iv is that had the crime been committed hy by a miner no matter how bow honest and trustworthy in the past t h he e would have been locked u up and not 0 t a pi allowed lo 10 ed practical liberty the AN public realizes e s lizes this and knows that richard grants wealth and social position have secured liberties that common sense teaches should not have been allowed it was a diabolical deed with hardly the shadow of a ing circumstance upon which the accused can make a defense the action of the justice in admitting him to bail A variously commented upon and for our part we w e havo have no hosi hesitancy tancy in saying that it is our opinion that the decision overrides the evidence ad dured at the trial |