Show HE HB C COULD PROMISE JUDGE ZANE WANTS IT understood THAT HE HB WILL OT ALWAYS SUS BUS PEND today to day albert dewey dewe y who was for formerly erly a Mor mormon mou was called in the third Third district court to plead to an indictment charging him with unlawful ul cohabitation with mary L dewey lizabeth elizabeth E woolcott and sarah J shearer from dec 2 Sl a to te N nov A 1886 the th defendant aj ellerea a AV itcan it cao guilty the bourt askeli askea do you i wisa h I 1 seii sentence pronounced now mr dewey no oh no I 1 dont want sentence pron pronounced bounced now mr dickson I 1 think he wants to promise obedience to the law in future so I 1 understood him court Is that your intention mr dewey yes sir court Y you on understand there is a law against polygamy and unlawful ue cohabitation do you intend to obey that law mr dewey I 1 propose to obey ohp law courtiour Court Your intention is to obey the law mr dewey yes sir court you understand what the law is and alid intend to obey it in good s baith emr mr dewey yes sir i court well if people tilde understand batand the law and continue to violate it I 1 dont want it understood 1 that the I 1 court will continue 0 o hold out ont the in du cement that sen sentence tince will b bebus SUB t pen dedin in all cases where promise is made let the suspended the court then repeated its that it should not be understood that parties who conti continue nub to violate the taw until arrested could have sentence sentence suspended on theraby them thern by promising obedience to the law ani and mr dewey departed from the court room of the seventh ward of this city the court asked him have v you OU anything to say why sentence should not be pronounced pronoun ped on you mr foster no six sir court have you ou no assur assurance sice to rive give that you yon val obey the law in the future mr foster no sir the court then theia sentenced him to the tae fall penalty of the lawsia T S imprisonment t and aad a eluo and costs BEDSON sao a resident of the seventh ward came next the same questions were asked by the tae court as in in the case of mr foster the same answers given I 1 and a similar penalty imposed 1 WM WK it A WATSON of farmington was the next in order same questions same answers and same mine penalty I 1 I 1 i i T bawl clack ol of farm farmington ta agton was thou then called hei he ie replied plied to the interrogations of the court 1 I blaye no promises to make maka the if ull full penalty was vas inflicted on him JESTER of farmington came next and informed formed the court that he had no assurance to give as to his future f conduct and the full penalty was im posed of the tenth was next called ane ft same bame questions were put as in the be proceeding case ase same answers given gien and same penalty ADAMS I 1 of cent Centre reville vUle received similar treatment I 1 HOGAN of bountiful followed in the same game path I 1 BLUNT of tale twenty first ward was not in when his bis name was first called but arrived shortly after and having no promises to make j he received ived the extreme sentence af these ase brethren were placed in abi bof e ole th afternoon to er imprisonment lor for coh conscience kd |