Show WRO WHO IS FALSE 2 our attention has haa been called to two mall pamphlets written bad and published ty rev bev J C andrew of provo tim tiie correspondent who sends us ue the cat ions referred tet erred tr te numbered tracts affo I 1 and no 2 RUi cRest I 1 might say that the reverend gentle man anan claims to have written them with the kindliest kind liest feelings toward the morion people who have treated him very considerately but that he conscientiously believe 4 he be la Is right and that it is his hi auty to present the vie views a he entertains the the right may prevail pr ovail we would be highly gratified if we ald mauld consistently take the view ol of mr andrewss work migrated Mig gated by our but thin the bestanic spirit it displays in both of the tracts sent u precludes the possibility of out outgoing outdoing doing so BO and at the same time adhe adhering flag to the truth we will howver bever content ourselves oura elTea with as a brief brie reference to the as a be eema 0 so o justify if urther further w attention be required for them la in the suture future we may take opportunity to ite it mr andrews aadrew ev Ailles one of his hl false prophecies of joseph 1 then than be takes up the pre ties made in IB december 1882 by abe he prophet J aeno smiths smith regarding the opening orthis rebellion at south carolina that bin part of tb toe prophecy hat ha been fulfilled to the alev ov andrews andrew cannot deny so 0 o tries trie to 10 explain it wy away y saying jook it might oe 11 eluo line that tbt expectation uld did not eglit dt at jie As esme the tb revolution stion visa given but bui ra was diametrically opposed to toe the idea v which blob pre prevailed val led the be statement ept of the balog M a and ad as an 11 for or fully twenty years jean after it was waa roads made by lead leading t OK papers papera and persons penona in the united 48 tates there is evidence to show bow that the be rev bev andrew has haft a very limited knowledge of the anticipation in the united states between 1882 and 1860 then this reve reid 9 taye the parts of the prophecy which bay bar not seen been fulfilled neither orn can be are as a fol follows lowr and tb souther states shall ball call al on great britain and shall ahall also upon other cattone nat loae tone ste etc not mr Andro andrewa weld assertion of at fulfillment non the southern states did can call upon great britain as ar predicted by the prophet nearly a third of a century efi tary before it occurred the re part of the prophecy la in mis stated bated by the reverend and ghowe ble deliberate intention to min mi represent rep reent alter after mentioning great britain the revelation says ay and they also aleo call upon other na ti onI etc today the carlest tyro I 1 in t international knowledge can see ee that thai it is ia not only a possibility but a proba ability that to in the troubles lei to in europe great britain will call upon other nations to act with her in obeal ine ina with international matters matter hence mr andrews andrew Is denial that that hat part oan can boll be fulfilled may be given ftp true value by intelligent people otte one more reference to la made by we toe gentle nan man who says ay of the application in ID the compendium prepared by eldow EIJI F D rich ads rda and J A little ol 01 0 the be fifth verse of the prophecy to the american indians that nothing in ID the be prophecy bows bowe that were intended as aa the remnants of the land ay here the gentleman fendleman fent leman again makes a misstatement the prophecy refers to two classes in thle this land the gentiles and the rem nants PP designations well known to mean the white race rod and tho the amerl flan can aoa bucl in 10 fact trie only classification to abich the terms cao can avely io in that connection next mr andrews takes what he calls false prophecy prop becy no 2 11 sod cites the doctrine and covenants see gee joseph joeph my son on if thou livent until thou them art eighty five ave years old thou see ee the he fees face of the son of man therefore let this buffoloe Buff loe and trouble me no more on this matter we have hare given the quotation correctly while mr andrews andrew s haw has not he may baitt it predicts predict that carist woula come in when joseph joeeph would be eighty five years yearb old the depth oi of this hf rev reverend erendt wr itei beiss prevaricating cotrit may be undo understood matood when tb statement made in the very next sen tones ot of the section iurino iUri nl from ift 16 read in ID which joseph say I 1 was left lat thus without being bein able to decide whether this coming referred to the beginning of the Mill or to some gome previous ap appearing pearlo or whether I 1 should die and thus see foj his face JOI josephs spirits death d eat b occurred in the theirly year of f bin ail site a thus furnishing ono one of the haaf ehigh the prophet tie the of a promise made to him the statement to is no DO prediction at all as to the coming rif of the boo bon of MOD man oo on that point joseph nave ilav e no DO information at that time oo on soother another occasion to in 1844 lie he did make a prophecy regarding that event w whoa blon william miller oath of tb Killor iteN proclaimed the immediate comlus of the be lord joiseph then prophesied christ will not come in totty years 3 and as s he did not come josephs JoBe pbs only predict prediction io it on we tb subject as to time abat mb bat at been fulfilled mr andrews andrew further tries to make ut U that the prophet Prop belr stale meat at the time the she were selected february 14 1835 1895 that even fifty six aix years wind up the scene related to the see sec ond corning coming but this is in another role mis th ugh it may not be original with the gentleman it if mr An andreae drewe or any otheir orbr poopoo will ascertain what that acene 11 was and when it began or will begin then he can figure out the two time of its winding up the fact to is that the prophet jo seph smith never set a time lor for the second com colloff comi loff nir and mr andrewss claim that he be did is a palpable error it is a mark ol of strength strong tb in a cause when ben it has to be misrepresented to ue uc attacked attached this misrepresentation misrepresent allon the rev andrews has hag resorted to wilfully regarding mormonism tue the more to its file lasting shame and disgrace th tbt sLate statements ments in the tract regarding regard ing elias bliss and ad elijah and the two and those in his bis other tract track are of like character with these criticized here 1310 H assumes to elate the views of tte latter day sainte and states them tb he Hemak makess efla pious pre tense tenae in br ble writings writ inifi posing as a devout believer io in the now new TeSta most lo in that attitude we heartily to him the earnest coo consideration of the WOT wor 8 of the beloved dle ciplet recorded in ID abo first epistle of jobo joba second chapter and fourth verse verae and we trust in aji ail charity charily that repentance will come to him ere it is too late |