| Show THAT WRETCHED ORDINANCE THE city council wrestled with biti tb thac garbage ordinance again on tuesa evening and had a hard time of IL L several improvements have been mad balg on the original document but it in still very faulty and the council wicki wisely laid the matter over for further mit one provision of the ordin ance as ae it now stands we think lain is a equitable and would not stane etana a Judi judica elal test it Is sure to be contested if n in IB its ita present form AB it provides in section ten for th tb removal of garbage and ashes asbee within 4 the business district which has been very properly cut down in areas area S the expense of th ano city while in iii aai at other districts it to is to be removes at the expense of the owner agent 0 occupant this is special leg legislation latiola at and it is in favor of a class more aak wl to bear the expense than the diac whichard chare required to bear the burden it the general funds df 0 the city 9 ai to be expended for the removals remo refuge in ore one district they wll ba bakeh t to bear the for expense its removal 1 other districts if the people of on maDi municipal cipal ward are required to w ps for the removal of refuse rn matter atter 1 W people of all the other wards subject to the same requirement public money contributed by all A taxpayers tax must not be expended fort sp op cial privileges to a favored few J comparing sections three and 11 lh it appears a that no house slops can dl disposed of or deposited except some vessel free from leakage ou outlaid td the building to be emptied ik 0 onoe a 00 week IR ia summer and two W weeks til winter and all garbage is to be kekst put cut ft the same vessel if that does not act create a far greater nu nuisance leatice and much mor ill III health than the ordinance is in intend ed to remedy we fail to u understand ader stand ita lt signification then ashes and rubbish must not be deposited in 14 tak adte same vessel with gar garbage bOlge why dam d not appear but the inference to IB ant comba combustible 0 tible rubbish may in A y 9 go 0 W with ith th garbage there are other crudities and conw dictions still left in the bill alth although it has been cut and patched and tt I 1 fled greatly we suggest that jj competent attorney or other othe who understands plain english ED aalf simple legal principles be emp employed loyid to draft a now new bill the hand that up the original piece of imbecility 10 not cutout out out for the work the draft of ordinances prevented ted to t the h 0 ma I 1 council of late display incapacity 8 n folly that are pitiable to bedoll sat humiliating to who have inspect for our municipality |
