| Show UNDER advisement elsewhere in this issue of the WEEKLY appears the argument at of e judge powers before the Terri torii supreme court feb 25 in the tn zane case judge was followed by judge me spoke in behalf of tine the rec receiver received eivet and ad his attorneys he pointed out tbt tn J the charges made in the trustees petition insinuated bad faith bat the counsel for the court that there was no bad fall faith th in any of the transactions he iu argued that report port of examiner harkness cowed the whole ground was in harmony with the evidence d should be adopted by the court ae a complete vindication of the ceu aed judge marshall closed the ante he claimed that the re odvar had been derelict in not Wt 94 hering in more of the personal JWo erty of the church than he had ne there was also some real wate to which the same amer assertion tion 1 ate I aty agli applicable cable tadge go henderson do you think the be final decree estoes the govern from pursuing ing y property hereafter discovered dise J adge marshall yes yee sir as to all Mp erty 1 not specifically mentioned froe eee decree there was come bome further colloquy 1 I this point and judge henderson ed suppose the government is cropped rop bp ped as to all other property and PW it who do you charge that low 0 o tov to judge Mars marshall ball I 1 charge the re r with being negligent in not informing the court of this outside property so that it could be warned hot c to become a party to the final d offee ee without full knowledge on tl surjeet wib Sub jeet we say we have evi to show bad faith on the part ithe the receiver in not detailing ac whately his services as receiver afa bibb the question of his campen ott was under consideration the he court took the matter under |
