Show FROM WEDNESDAY 8 DAILY SEPI 29 released today to day brother L D watson of parowan carowan Pa rowan and levi of wellsville were released from the penitentiary the latter has aas berged five months to which he was sentenced ced witla without out any fine the former wa was S imprisoned mpr for a six months ter term and ad 30 days for the fine john wm win snell was brought down from the penitentiary to day for examination on nis his dp application for discharge but a tit hearing aring had bad not been tad bad when we went to press an invention the scientific american ivanof of september 18 hat hao the following A washing machine has ha been patented ny mr william M epan egan of salt lake city utah ter the buds box has a close fitting cover and a false concave bottom of parallel bars the clothes tresser presser being a perforated hoard board with fingers that enter and work in the grooves of the bottom so 80 that when the presser la is vibrated it raises the clothes out of the water squeezes an all tbt thin n allows them to fall back into t the he suds 1 cannot be fouad the gase ase of the united states vs joseph blount indicted on a charge 0 unlawful tation was reached in the third district cobit today to day the defendant was not present pr ebent and inquiry ili of the district attorney elicited the fact that the marshal had been unable to find him mr dickson ackson sa gaya s mr blount J went before tilt the grand jarv and made a cj clean au breast of 01 everything and the prosecutor supposing that he would plead gu guilty city only obtained a one count indictment agai against hith him ind made no effort to secure his hia arrest the whereabouts of the defend defendant Amt are of course unknown at present the U S vs va henry arnold the setting of the case ol of the united states vs henry arnold for trial at this term of the third district court has hal been a matte matt erlof comment by the public the defendant is under anin an indictment cou taing one count and charging him with cohabitation with his wives in violation of the edmunds edmund law it has been the general understand understanding jag that he be was in en gland or some other foreign for efen country when mr dickson was asked for an explanation as to why he fixed the date of trial of a defendant who had not been arrested and was not in the country he stated before the commencement me antof of the present term of court he received a letter from mr arnold in n which the latter said he would come and stand trial he has not yet arrived however |