Show THE RULING ON THE ZHE TAX tar CASE CASS our readers iv wilin nd in thi issue the decision of ot jud judge go hunter in the sutherland tax case ame he iro sustains the validity of the revenue law au but bub f ruley raley that the uncollected taxes assessed under the old law must be collected under section 28 23 of the new now law and therefore cannot be bi i collected by distraint this is virtually a deci decision glon fion against the assessor poi goi ilis his honor is clean cleat on OD moat ot of th the points in his dec decision sion slon Aion loui but does not eatables establish definitely his ruling on the iho df of procedure under he section if taxes not colle collected cled under the old law jaw must be collected under I 1 the he pro provisions dilons of 0 th the new wily why does i not s section 19 which provid provides es for dist distraint raint apply to those taxes the seizure was mado maco december ard 3rd and the collector is not oot required to settle until ber ben distraint is the method of C collection ollee tion betwee between ii october and december 3 5 list after nater which ns the collector will have then paid up the full amount of the thui taxes the uncollected ted amounts am ounia ounla bamme Ws hia 0 own property and find b he 0 must enforce collection correction by suit t and net not by sel bel sexture ture we have no f further ur apace allour our com eom command malid tor lor comment today to day |