| Show THIRD DISTRICT COURT I 1 it I 1 1 proceedings before e chief justice zane friday shemoon ahe moon october 3rd ard 1 I 1 1 I 1 in th as q 0 i the th e P people eop esp le e etc te 1 v I nels neis neilson nellson JeU leu son soo the demur demurrer rei rel to the il was argued b by b E 1 D Hoge jon joi fog jog defendant and andu C sr saviri rl an an for the prosecution Sub submitted mittA in the cas case caso 0 of the tho people et etc vs jomn gfreeman convict convicted edof of staining property by motion in arrest of judgment ws wis argued vb by A miner for defendant aad by blics C 8 vanan arian arlan tor tha the submitted I 1 est esi in cecase of E itz aj D vs samuel CE wing etal et al the motion for 4 a new nevy triaL was waS wat argued by efi hoffman for and the argument for sor defendant was waived byirl bwhipp BW ripp submitted nu people is jn 11 freeman obtaining ino ing money by jaird pretenses it in int arrest of Xie denied nied exception cep tion for wednesday the othall athill harriet M 6 co vs phoenix ml co cot got i et al defendants allowed ave days daya suggest su agest adest amendments to topped plo posed sta statement on motion 1 for a now new trial triai 4 i us S Q vs amial ai ferry default an antt J judg as prayed J jas jis sp hutchison Hn va v henrietta me mc 11 way liay dev demurrer aurre and motion tb strike gutc out cOss oss osa coin com complaint flaunt plaint argued byis byis J Jonsson for defendant i no noone ene one ap pared awed for plain plaintiff tiff and andt th motion wea submitted 1 cour court monday T iabry lui lag 10 0 I 1 vi ty |
