| Show WOMEN AND WE havo have already noticed at some length dr hammonds Hammon dys dyb article in tho north american review on the tho subject of women in politics we did not dispute hia his fact facter but objected to his conclusions and refer to the matter again just joehow to show that one ona of his assertions at least is incorrect he cited ns as a proof of womans comans unreliability that agn cin on account of her inability to be exa exact c t in regard to her age the bleess disease e bhe she may have had her mode of life and other matters in which exactness is required life insurance us granco orn corm comm panics decline to issue iesue poll policies cleis to her the of officers ficere of leading insurance companies in new york corfe have in denied dented dr hammonds assertion they are just juat as willing to insure women as men and poll cles are not hot reserved for those blone bione who tell the truth of either sett bek more men than women insure their lives it la Is true but the reason is not that advanced by the writer against comans womans poll poli enfranchisement it la Is became because men generally are the property owners and mr mairo malco he provisions in case ef their death by mead menn a of insurance for the women and children who are dependent upon them dr Ham Hammon hammonds monds monda dd statements are not all facts and if they were until a certain standard Is ia set up for weight and quality of brain as aa a qualification for political liberty his argument against woman unfitness us fitness for politics amounts to a solemn no thing |
