| Show TILE THE tiie boheya slices THE case of beila bella lle lie s will be referred z IS ter tor it has 1 kg mim alm the af afi 0 it is not a common commo nav c c ce edings edinga which ledl aed a desire desiro to catch and anda lebed polygamist hyi byh A mony which it was wasel q bo be drawn er or tz exi persons who were gup sup guppa grievance 9 ag kim kym 9 hii tit thought that out of sp be ready to tell things f 1 be used in such a way x nate the individual rt prey of a deputy p torney Be He Judged tte ibe own OTTO low standard of 0 hi but they did not tuis tuta pa t e d belle neile wal wll matter that leh ieh lelatt e she avys thir va w wy ay agam 14 a t i an accused per pere gamb xa 71 query was de debe way for ot others hersI hersl gli alf awer biach black blocked ed the thel quirles igara ara in ya man if so eo were you mar married tion put to her swier we ly right in the daal pod ed the court ilio th lia liw and wished to cowpe 66 the judge was not noi noto ca the infliction of a to fj farther remanded hes leib of the tho IT 8 MK would answer if carried out we thid egy elj will stay in custody I 1 by a hand which and floors officers of and all lj lions bhe she Is of a q wo tia tin ness that tx felted bested by strong stronger or threats she bhe meanie in a w whiff able to endure a word I 1 1 Suppo supposing eing the a proper one w wod woe of the court navot navel sustained by the they the sive five days day 1 by law it looby 00 mind why el because this det def debet part of the joint joint the plan de crusade against wa AD by the process bf dence deuce from froin giosasi the mat mst plan pian an work not ta deile beile beila harris codle answered the 00 which did 0 O would not have basy I 1 po pose ce but nat she Bhe deeo detO and ws W 4 stood upon her hez t she bhe manntai maintained ed aex and of all nil witnel widd to appear as she ehe was C UP r right night at here commes mab of prerogatives the UA g attorney and of a gru gro W legal authority yeti zell establishing F inquisitor and the 0 ce of ho eli ell the grand gand jury juny did not ask belle harris a single quEs question tiou tion zera snow acted as the grand jury it was he whom the witness declined to answer by what high right does the tho attorney for the territory or any of his deputies usurp tho the prerogatives of a grand jury and where Is in the dignity and good sense of members of such a body in permitting any man to take their sworn duty out of their hands and perform it just as aa insults it suits him he may prepare in m the names persona to be called as witnesses act as the legal adviser of the gra grand nd jury but bui he has haa no right to be the grand jury it is time that office officious persons persona who are aching to distinguish ting themselves vea in a special direction to gratify malevolence were pulled up standing and remanded to thoin their proper place the grand jury at beaver were vene not treat treated edwith with con tempt by eelie belle harris and they should have had sense eno enough 9 not not to become responsible I 1 Is for the antics antles of an impertinent and presumptuous official grand jurors have bome rights as aa well as prosecuting ast attorneys orneys and courts and ought not to be ba bullied out of them or scared into resigning them into the hands of individuals In dividu it would puzzle the beaver in inquisitor to coshow show his right in the jury room at all while the business of the grand jury was being conducted except when needed as its legal adviser but betit it seems that it has become the custom for the attorney to constitute himself the grand jury jurys and then let them layher father bis hia domes doings and sign his papers but bince since the case has gone so eo far and the supreme court of the territory has adjudged tho the witness in contempt of the second district court what can yet be done it if it Is ia thought wise to do so BO the case may be taken up on habeas corpus to the supreme court of tho the united states as provided in section 9 of the organic act or the defendant may atay in custody until the grand jury shall meet again as aa adjourned by judge twiss to tb the Is of august what then if the witness chooses to answer she may 1 but the grand jury will have then to be soon discharged that another may be e for the september term mj and will no longer exist for her to answer to it ls is la 13 probable that she will prefer to wait until then as appears to bo be a prominent feature in her char nefer neter what will be the outcome of all thih this will women be intimidate every question that a paul pry attorney chooses to asir or a grand jury to permit we ve think not the example of belle harris will leave its influence upon her sex and ladies in utah upon whom similar attempts may bo be made will in all ail a probability p stand on their alg dignity n ity liy and main maintain tain their rights even if it should entail bufie ring zing and the tem term horary iosa losa of liberty A vindictive and land extreme course hns huk been taken troma irom the beginning la in this cage case and it will fail in its object belle harris looms up as a victim to legal gai gal impudence and judicial harshness and the consequences will not be ba such as were desired by the lawyers or the judges |
