| Show A W romps 0 t warning 1 against ita iza a a ta more subtle temptation because the eye and taste get gradually demoralized some periods lito are voise worse than otle otie others in this thia jp respect speet but there willah wiil will al w ways ys lie be tendencies to be guarded guarde d 49 against llis ills t e either elther tho the those s q that are anfu ally to indecency er or merely to indecorum e g the quietest bonnet i of the fashion of ISTA would have beon been e e n the most indecorous in 1830 and could eoula have been worn by no respectable ped pec tabie table person dierson though now the this cot cottage take would vold toll be an enormity bud but when in the beginning pf af the een den century tury ladies ladles trying to be classical wore hardly two petticoats and backed out of the room like ilke pixies nixies for fear their fathers and aunts shou should id bo be horrified by W the ibe statue like outline of their torsos fa fashion hian W wont went ant a fa good ivay way beyond the simply y indecorous and thai ba same she may be aalia fp id 0 pt i the height of the tho corsage and probably p wali be orsome women will winfor tuna tillia tely fely bixl ixl always be found who are sufficiently lost to modesty to be bo willing to attract by display 6 0 themselves and aud there iare are daners pilu who thoughtlessly imitate them because neca beca use they will ylli not be lie outdone out done and dud dp d a p ablio 1 tash fash fashion loii is formed wh which dh absorbs the thought less legs and cinalt baked ba others afraid oft ort of the he suspicion of pr duery once nor for fo r ali all atly ally exposure is always wrong wrong at ever be the fashion it ta 1 i bi christian ristian womans comans duty tosea kimn inde indecency ern comes in and arid to I 1 otest against it by her own example exam p lei its and aud influence though not hot by censoriousness relative e indecorum should also aiso be guarded ngai agai tasi tast the first entrance of a fashion that teho tend to h a b boida bolda R bearance pe arance ought I 1 td tb be bo resl resi resisted iteck mannish dresses hio hie are aro undesirable rable rabie on this account and ard it is well to cululi vate the shading of the face as mii mil much C h as possible not wearing suc sue such m hats hata as are barely endurable because others have them exposure of the face is one of tho the great tendencies i of the time and though it if js not exactly indelicate in itself yet the bold conar confronting i p t 0 of f notice eliat iq hl involved in going gut put with 1 jy unprotected countenance thrown into prominence by the ljean headdress dress cannot be modest modept knit 14 itself asid nor does a veil coming elosa dv dver over e T the tha nose materially alter the matter crinoline crilio 11 ll ge only indecorous therefore if lt w was as not worth while to go against the stream but corsage and tight skirt and some gome kinds of headgear head gear should be avoided at any cost of singularity colors lil ili likewise bisett biset are involved in thet ther matter of modesty chatis what is obtrusive is never nevet fit to put pui any ony fbi for fhi it brings oyes eyes upon the wearer there thero is no need fo to giva instances most of UT nsf understand thit thin tha there thero Is s A difference ference betge between en brightness brighon i ess ap and d gaudi gaudiness gaudinez net neg and und if unfortunately ely wo wc are bern born without the ey eye to kel see what is appropriate observation from others will generally tea teach chit it to be conspicuous is the tho thep spec ecial lal ial thing to be avoided glaring contrasts hasty basty pd option adoption of fresh mo desall t that hat challenges tion alq aia inconsistent with obe ohe sobet sobey nesa pesA and 11 which weh forms part of the christian woman vroman s 17 M rov yov a i 1 |
