Show May 28 1975 1 r5 Page 4 ed k in Chalk up another id le le s From all indications the peCrraf0n td l- - e is without incident We see two discrepencies here 9 Winter The tirst is in the proposal itself- Beg student who didn t prea 1976 returning an quarter December will find that he owes in early register additional $10 in late tees say that the recommendation the of Proponents it will simpmy rhannp is a "aood idea" because of each quar er the beginning registration procedures at more efficient and make class scheduling means of en- Perhaos but is the $10 fee the onlybe made without rant these improvements the°ever present doNas and cents penalty hanging over isn't a heck ““Granted! asking a student to of a big thing to ask especially since pre'r®'str® ter 9 in order to ha a privilege we agitated for But is socking an extr opportunities in class selection fails to do so a u $10 fee to the student who pre-regist- er Secondly we ask where have our el Pn changes have been discussed tatives been while these aware that such a stiffpenalty Most of them still aren't made is likely to be imposed No one has no one has taken inform the studentbody and apparently time to analyze its fairness to students to see that encourage that every action be taken Wp 25 iffST proper' "J before June 4 ana to complete their costly measures aren t prove that such strict and more efficient needed to make registration by Marsha Bowen pre-registrati- News Editor Viewpoint Administration listens by Nolan Johnson recently (and There have been many statements will be) eluding and always probably always have been Utah State at of our administration here UnTversfty within the scope of our educational process c students the consumer or on two Some would contend that we are juxtapose our educationa different teams in trying to achieve that the Hs°'? goals Some would believe in whatever administration is to oppose others e®' aspirations they may have easy chair and women have lust been handed thein their millions back and rake position and can now sit these contentions every student andwrong and I only regret that ad?alulty member on campus cannot see the ministration in true perspective or me au We are on the same team the goals to the goals o ministration and university are parallel education a students the major objective being quality education Everv person on this campus views quality that disagreement in a different light but remember does not mean disloyalty to and actea Students' needs and concerns are listened Students are nn bvtheaoverning body of this institution inject their feelings into many opportunities to everv policy making body on this campus structure is Each individual within the administrative student wh dedicated to creating an environment for pnahles them to pursue their aspirations ears and personally am appreciative of the listening whichs something open minds of our administration the country °! not found on most campuses throughout not agree on but course there are issues which we do not mean disloyalty again disagreement does -- 'fs'WlSt I FRANKLY SPEAKING by phil frank STUDENT LIFE i th official tudnt publication oTutShT® TSR th roponcibilit of WEDffOIALPOLICY Tnrv th right to rfu EDITORIAL OPINIONS ignd article LETTER NEU-TH- E fOUCY Th ony ar tolly ditor df th tho rv th TH Th Caff JSTboaid and tho ngl C ta IJU or ditor can lottar All ifudTnl numb by F2RP&N vtnify Cfitr 317 by Utah I4321 with writ SubicriptiM h A- - |