| Show t lw editor evening retes I 1 notice ia in one of our aty dailie aa statement from general chetlain Cheti Che Uain ulin aln ain ignited states assessor or for utah in relation to the amount of df IT S taxes taxed jil montana and uth fur for the year 1867 the difference Is about in davor favor of df the former forbert it jt will viii be observed observe dd that in the thel matter of df I 1 manufactures aad productions utah leads montana neary nearly 20 while in I 1 the item of V liquor licences licenses licen ileen ces ees es montana is ahead nearly I 1 admit the 1 population tion ilon was probably double that of bf montana in 1867 yet yetla it urist bt be ba borne bortke in mind that montana was aud and and sud bishow using million 11 lons lone of foreign n capital in IV its rd mining and other operations t nearly all of it taxable there while utah never had any A there are moreover double the tili number of business establishments in iri the former furmer subject to special icente mhd the people of montana are a ml mining and trading people while those of utah are an a agricultural z people it is qs well known that the former in all parts of tiie tile country pay a much lar larger ger tax than the latter li 1 i yours le ac A TAX pah PAS BE I 1 jl ii S lo 10 iolj |
