| Show faint through hunger and fatigue gen uen connor invited us into another roam and tendered us refreshments we myself wife and daughter were then placed in a wa wagon walon 0 n la and conveyed to the main street of great salt 1 t lake city and there left to get back home aa as we best could I 1 never sent hirs mrs hyson a note informing her mat nat I 1 was about to leave i j the country and that if she wished to see her I 1 i child she ebe must visit my residence to do so i no armed men assisted me when I 1 took my child from mrs mra hyson hypon SAMUEL MILTON HOWE subscribed and sworn to before me this thia eleventh day of 0 march A D one thousand eighth hundred and sixty tour four JOHN T caine carne notary public ANOTHER STATEMENT john W hess bishop of davis davig county utah territory says I 1 saw henry hyson and his wife and mrs hynons youngest child by samuel milton howe go to mr air john R blanchards Blanc hards house in farmington to stop I 1 think on monday march fib 1864 san Sau samuel irtel milton howe I 1 I 1 was told by I 1 those looking on came to blanchards Blanc hards barda house and took the child from mrs hyson and went home with it mr and airs mrs hyson both followed howe chatted awhile there and hyson went back to blanchards Blanc bianc hards harda after telling birs mrs hyson that he would corne come to camp douglas and get force enough to come and take her and children ilys hysen n soon after started for lor camp douglas and on wednesday march fth be he came back on horseback and took bis his wife wih wilh him in taking the child from mrs airs hyson husher by howe her former husband husher busher and father her ber of the child there were only a few idle spectators looking on aa as la is common aldno and no toree force oree was used nor did any anyone une one interfere in the matter further farther furth forth berthan than a mr air 1 I 1 homas dobb at howes request took the child when howe released mib mis grasp from it this is about all I 1 know of the tha addair affair signed JOHN joun W hess hiss great salt lake city march lith 1864 I 1 the foregoing is a plain and correct statement of the principle facts connected with the late raid from camp douglas there were not only no armed citizens to aid either howe or his divorced wife in their contention for tl a possession of the child but crotti from all we can learn there was cot one of the casual spectators who had bad the least desire or disposition to interfere in favor of either party further than a mr dobbs by hob Hot honwea request took the sleeping child that it might night not fall when freed from the mothers grasp handed banded it to howe who took it still asleep to his bia home F demonstrating that there was not much apisa noise made or force used even by ilowe the citizens in farmington were aware that the question bad been heard and decided in court coutt and were perfectly willing that it should rest with the court and the parties part pait lea iea whether the probate judge erred in judgment in decreeing both children to the fat tat father tather her we know not not being rogn cognizant izant of the facts in the case but the fact is faient patent that either party feel ng aggrieved 1 1 had the privilege of appeal 0 or of a hearing rehearing re upon the production of satisfactory reasons that no appeal or rehearing hearing re has been asked for durna duriga perio perlo I 1 of almost ten months is a strong indication that the decree was corrent correct why howe permitted his divorced wife to leave with the youngest child we have not j inquired but presume chiefly on account of its being a nursing babe 1 howes forcibly taking the child after leaving it several months in the mot mothers bers berb care is laid to the ibe advice of a friend in whose I 1 judgment he confided now we neither question llon lion ehrgood thi good faith of howe in asking advice and acting upon it nor that of his friend in giving it but we take leave to qi question estion the wis wisdom otora cLorn of the advice then given is a very commo commonly received opinion and often I 1 acted upon that a person bas has the 1 f able to possess himself whenever and where bever ever found of what thelah awards him bim B but ut it ll is clearly our opinion that in this and kindred casas casis if not in all cases the mor more and ana law abiding course is to petition the curt ourt to enforce its decrees or decisions d |
