| Show y STANDARD COUNSEL TALKS TADS OF DECISION He Says That the Decree Docs Does INot Not Order a Dissolution of iThe The Oil Company AN APPEAL WILL BE TAKEN lu of ur Court In III lire tit 1110 Ix Is I lly II New e Tork York Nov No It F R general n ral I for tor the th urd oil said Mint ael today toda in m r m for the alt arst time on the th III do Ilon walnut against aNa the tho romi n ny handed sown y yesterday Ur y liy by 11 th the thit United su 8 States t i circuit court at al Bt t Paul PaulI 1 I li have vo M Men Been n what purports to be the text tut of or the th decree d down don n by b the United States SIMM circuit court yesterday The company will take t kc an ap appeal pp I Im to the sute supreme court and end will 11 al abide Mr by th the verdict of the court ourt In fn th the theland land Jand whatever that t at may be Argument In this tbt car n e begun loen l last t April and w wr t ore arr jt gad all tl i to have r reach reah reached ed 00 an en I ilo do not swan mean we are ar Pleased 1 with It h Iu tic 11 pinion pillIon lr but we weare w weare are fI glad aIm i to get M It whatever Its It nature The Tb do 1 I roe an un not order a dl or of th Ih the t d OH Oil III n that chat 1 is a 1 t lint What hat the decree or u se I t In n now m It Itla la ia 1 that the eo pany shell hall distribute ll lt It its II of t lumi hm there the are re It lt holdings holding V VM I M rk 11 of or nul n Tins 1111 distribution 1 l furl 1 I r Is I to Ix I l on n a pro rata hAe of r nt That I 1 is to say xay 1 lice hIli t let feet hII T of f r st Standard n lard hird Oil 01 re elre 1 a 1 proportional number i of or shin in I thi th stork IOl of ot sub lub ul Mr Ir gUtt tt w as n i kid IId what hat course th would nouM 11 If the II u diet of or the tho lowi i 1 ar hull be upheld In the th higher court I ri at ic rc 1 u II I Ia fig I v I i hs l I e better beur prepared to I l u when I 1 hI 0 lIen even r en the Ih opinion by which the th thI I States mate circuit court It Its dere dr tree Henry Henrj Wellman who represented the attorney general of ot Missouri In that hat d ales ale s null cull against the Standard Oil I and conducted fondu the th In III New York of or the tho officers of or the pAn takes a view similar to that by b Mr air Ho Ito uin up III IIII the I situatIon an as a theoretical yin vic yint Ie tr t rt I 1 cannot Me M H he Ire said lillie that mv my m r ra effert la I to be expected 01 tt l It Itne ne in ell a a If It the best bent tho government ran can do 10 1 I is to order the sale Hlo of or the prop property property erty and lind In that o ease oae e the money of or nurse ou IM to the tho present er sW pra In ix some tn rne form Corm or other There U Ie Uno I Ino Ieno no niton no n nil as there thore would 1 b ha In the ease m of criminal proceedings plO with the of ot a 1 abig III big line fine The rn la le I similar to that of or Ute the coal roads which w were re forced to wp p arute arste from their thelt con COR coal I business anti itis It ItIn ItI In is I difficult to say any even If It the decision l I Is upheld by b the supreme court ourt how howth howth th the nt can 1111 prevent tho the con control control control of nt Standard Oil properties remain Inc In in tn the tI same panda hand even If It It Is III f split up liP Into lt its properties This Thin bM btu b been the east cue In every suit In m the of r combination combinations Tile The They have Anve v simply br bran n put Into different shape hAr and hv he g lIOn gene n atone along more mort Oln coIl 1 |
