| Show I i NO JURY JUDY AS YET E r IN BROWN BON CASE t ii I 4 livery Tilt Between Opposing Counsel in l Action to toi i I Break Will WillI V I t 1 SEVERAL S EVERAL CHALl CHALLENGES MADE MADEI MADEt I Ii It t t i Put to I r o rat on IonS or of I j I or of Children i Two jurors wore wele excused on I tor to In Judge dl i Ii f or of the ThIrd district court this morning where the action to break the tho 1 will or of the late Senator Arthur L LBrown Brown 15 brought b by the children ot of 1 Mrs Irs Anna I M Bradley Arthur Brown Bradley md and Montgomery Brad Bradu Bradi i luy u The Tho first juror to be 00 excused on t 1 the tho peremptory challenge or of tho plain i tiff tift was Joseph Josoph E Davis an Ice cream i l dealer ot of thIs city The challenging ori or of l i Mr Davis I did not apps r to bo 1 0 because l a of oC any bios bias or prejudice toward the tho cause causo ot of plaintiff In his mental tudo the actIon at bar but In z 4 l the de desire lre ot of the attorneys for tor toro o Mrs Bradleys children to secure IlS as Jurors men or of ot of chill chilly y I dren Mr Davis testified f ho Wd us i married but u did n not tare any children Il r tl i and though passed for tor causo by both bothi botha a i sIdes he was the first man excused by bythe the plaintiff on peremptory challenge i The second to leave the box boJC t f on an peremptory challenge was wall ChrIs 1 f i ia lion Uan Borger Berner a farmer ot of Salt Lake Lako a county count the tho peremptory was wa r exercised d by b tho defense and WM was pre presumably prey y upon the ground that Mr I Berger had expressed himself IC strongly as to obligations due to k on the part of the parents of such uch children Berger was challenged I for Cor cause b by the attorneys for Cor the de defene tense fene yesterday afternoon but Judge Ritchie denied tho challenge Justus Jungk was al also o challenged for cause f b by judge King at yesterday afternoons t l oo slon and this challenge was as sus sui Ii tamed In place Illace of oC Mr Jung k John S Sit it i Page pae 31 years old and the father ot of j 1 two children was WIlS passed for cause by byI 1 m I I the plaintiffs He was also examIned I and passed pas d h by the defense at this p 1 1 session ll l Oliver Hodgson yas ryas Interrogated by b d rt l l both sIdes IlS as to his attitude on ther the r r of the tho marriage maniago relation and andas 1 as to 10 the tho rights of children born out of wedlock His answers seemed to be bel l satisfactory to both sides r 1 TILT BETWEEN COUNSEL r i i j i i A sharp tilt lilt between counsel tot Col ColI I 1 I If J the question addressed by Judge 1 King to DavId ArchIbald us IlS to 1 j or er the knew the mother mothel ot of l 1 I i I ithe children Mrs Bradley and her j I i husband Clarence Bradley judge it I powers objected to the question on the ground that It tended to leave the tho im t II i 4 that Bradley Brodley was still the tho ll I II husband of Mrs Bradley Brodley d II Counsel for fol the defense knows I hi 1 I Ii i 4 said rold Judge JudEe Powers that thaL Mr Airs Brad hi hihi II If ir t was wea divorced from Mr 1111 Bru Bradley lIe lIei i I J four our or litre o years ears ago and I submit II ls 1 i q that the question was pUt wl wI L h the in j hi p tendon or of prejudicing the tho minds of 4 ti m I I the jul jury on this point p I u I did not know It replied JUdge t I Ring 11 1 li ii 1 Thereupon Judge KIng put the samo r p r l r Question usIng the worth word former be bew w t I f ro husband whom Mrs Brad Bradi i I Ie Icy claIms to hove have been divorced fy Ii I Judge Powers Power saId that ho did noti not g i I I wish to lake up the tho whole Bradley t I matter and thrash It out before this 11 1 f I I court unless forced to do so no b by de dei i 4 I counsel But If defendant Sj ht wishes s to drag dra It IL all In again I ams am s It prepared to meet hIm J 1 i i Counsel for tor plaintiff seems to be bee o oI I r I the e ono one who is dragging the old mat 1 is tel In said judge Kin King and I Ii l thInk thIs Is just ono one or of counsels i ti I II I I t bluffs 1 generally generall car carry my bluffs I l I through when I make them In court 1 t 1 sail Maid Judge Powers and the incident II passed II If H C Wallace was WIlS examined by I f 11 l V i plaintiff lIe claimed to have havo no fixed 1 opInion as to the paternity ot of the theU U Bradley children In response to lions questions by counsel for tor defense defenso lie he sal said that thaL he believed In the sacredness o othe of time the marriage relation and that the In Institution institution should be sustaIned Mr lr Wallace WaS WIlS passed Sed for cause b by plain William Nunn who resides at 1721 1 south State Slate street was called to the tho JU jury box He said he 11 urns 55 years cars old and the father Cather or of four COUI grown children chil children dren It developed that Mr lr Nunn hall had rather decided opinIons as to the legal tight ot of an any man to make a will disinheriting an any port part ot of his md and here a hint of time the IntentIon ot of the plaintiffs to appeal In the event that the tho verdict was wag against them was glen given Time The said ho he would 1 be 0 governed by b the instructions Instruct lions or of the court on the question ot of the tho law In re to this particular case ca e eYou You recognize the rIght or of herll d children to come Into court and examine and contest such a will do o you ou not asked askell Judge Jude Powers I do replied Mr Ir Nunn You niso recognize that another court may ma pass upon the tho Judgment of I thIs court un under er certain condItions 1 said sald the judge Yes sIr 1 do After Mr DavIs and Ind Mr Berger Belger had been excused James R Asher Ii a farm farmer er Granger Salt Lake count was called to till fill the panel but his ox ex examInation was postponed until act after r the noon recess |
