| Show MISSOURI LAW IW IWU U Il S Court Holds It Is lit iUd lIlI April Auth IT The su IU supreme preme couRt of ot time the buoy affirmed 1 the this of 01 time the circuit court for tor the district of ot Ml MIs 1111 In the case CUI of ot Paint VH vs 8 Cren attacking the time validity of lit time the beer In law of ot the time state of nt Missouri The effect of ot this thin decision Is IR to nut tain taimi the time law HH as not antagonistic to nil thi commence clause chalice of ot tile Constitution tit II II The opinion was sva delivered by bv Justin c White While Vhs The he chief Justice I timid and Justices and Day DR united In III u it opinion In 11 this tHIS Ale the tho I ho com corn company compan pany pan a t Wisconsin corporation n a hill hili In time the United States court for tor the time Western district of nt Missouri to ta enjoin renshaw the state beer hoer In Inspector from collecting f nn atm 01 charge Imposed by h l u it 1 Slate III n Il law 11 w on melt from other states The Tho law was we attacks attacked in nit to the Interstate provision of ot the time national Constitution but bul Justice Ju White said suld Id As s 11 th the supreme court of MissourI lIsl url has hu determined that the hit th statute does doe I Inot not conflict with the climbs con coni ii anti and Is II valid because It Is IR a 1 polio poll reg reI regulation Imposing conditions upon Ullon the busIness of ot manufacturing and selling Leer beer II lieI In Missouri a II which It Is conceded the state Itale had the lie power to lo prohibit entirely It II follows that w my I an art without power from a u of ot the thit institution to lo rat I tin the law lawas lawas as U alia bC of ot the tho pro lito I visions of ot the state constitution or other Imposed by that con constitution upon the state gO Justice Brown was the tha spokesman for the time dissenting Justices He tie said suld In part The consequences of ot this decision seem Resin to me rae serious It If tho time states may In tile In time the assumed u exercise of ot police 0 II ce powers enact Inspection laws lawa 11 which shieh are not such In itt fact tact and there thore thereby by jy Indirectly Impose u mm revenue tAX tux on U it Is to see any ony limit to timis power of ot taxation or why It may muy mt riot bo he applied to any other articles brought within the ho state |
