| Show IN 1 01 OP l SitS Timber in en h h l U Ii S 1 Court A dispatch dl says iy The supreme 1 court of ot the United to lo United dull Iu the aw of Ut the State vp VI the Ihl United Verde erile Copper fr Mining company of which WitH wan wann n IL 10 lo recover 01 mu ac sic account IL ILl count l of ut timber cut from the public hand lundi avid and u sd W II ore A Are ret reit of ot time the interior nl III dl that timber Umber not nol be lit wed used for fat e the thus law mIners w to out ou nU public timber limber to fU for purposes The olmo o was wua by who held that the IIII words domestic Included lh the Ihu roasting of or ore was wua en In entitled Onil thit the company titled tithed to cut timber on the PUblic lad for He Ih also held hald that thus tho h tid d no fl authority to nta n ft the cope of tIme the law tev a III as would lie he the effect In till Ull city chit ell If It ore oro roasting we wu Was I to In be con coil trued grimed u as om ore 0 The opinion the tile of f the court SUllie n mind and nIl PICk Peck Peckham ham united In III 1 5 dissenting opinion based baled on un the tho theory that ore oreIn rO In he not mot a |