| Show OBJECT TO AGREEMENT Judge and District Interfere In Bounty Casts Cases C There watt 11 evidently u a 1 somewhere In mi regard to tho lie sentence which Charles W V Jones Joncs Ed Ell rind Henry Martin wore vere to 10 re mc receive 10 celo In lit II of ot their thell turning evidence In lii 11 tho the bounty bouty boutty t Il I 11 rases und nd their arraignment together those of oC David lavid II and 1 Will Wi iii K g 1 Phillips Philips Was U delayed somewhat In II Judge court thin lila afternoon S It 1 Is s understood that the men mel Wt were tto to guilty guit In lit II lie tho die dis district court to 10 the Ito th charge of ot conspiracy and 11 were leere to testify for tor tho the and 1001 Ind Phillips It IL 1 Wil wan alo agreed that In iii consideration of ot their toOti many they thy were to tl ml be bo given a n six elx months tonal term tOrI in Ill the county Jail Jai Judge Ritchie und and DI Attorney ion rois 10 objected to any such mich arrangement tin lilt 1 that hIndu mado at 11 tIme the preliminary hear henr hearIng Ing They heY both contended that tho lie maximum penalty tot for tho tile b by I one une year In the tIo county JaIl was Wn lit l ll th though enough lough for the lie crime and Ind would not content consent to a 1 lighter sentence Attorney Bourn X N who WilO tho the inch bell lel stated to 10 the hue court the agreement which had hind be bee been n In 11 the lie court coutt below and Insisted on al Its ite It being curried out The court however would not consent the time took until Monday to plead Tile ril other defendants David II Da Ju JuIl VIM Vies Il Will WI n F F Phillips were In court 1 by oy their attorney J I K E i tho the charge entered pleas of at not guilty gui to IQ |