Show MRS MAYBRICK MAY RIK HAS CAPA CAPACITY CAPACITY CITY FOR AVOIDING QUESTIONS Washington March 29 Tho testimony test mony of or Mrs litre Florence In the taking of ot depositions In the tho case of her mother von vori n against David W V Armstrong and others In Involving II valuable tracts of or lands halide Ills In Vir Virginia ginia West Virginia and concluded today todar Mrs Maybrick k displayed marked ca cn capacity capacity for tor avoiding I direct to 10 the rigid to which she was subjected She Sho declared with wih respect to the thin signing of or certain papers In Iii II prison pison which were werl brought to It her by I Consul Potter Ioler that shun she he was uvas WIS so eo Imper Imperfectly Imperfectly Informed an as nt to tho ho communications louis tons that between letwen Mrs Airs r May Mn lila brick her mother sho hium simply signed SIgmund thin tho documents ments without mommy any In cleat clear ceal knowledge of ot tho Ito transaction Upon being pressed preened for tor n a more amoco direct answer nn ler Mrs Irl Insisted that when she sho signed tire papers she ehl did not know tho hue nature of or their contents The Tho ho defendant produced a n number ot of letters leters purporting to 10 have been writ written ten by her mother mOlher Mr Potter and Ind oth others ers before and I II during her Imprison Imprisonment ImprIsonment ment meat but she shun expressed her bier Inability to Identify time tho handwriting of any nit OttO ono OlO of or years cars ago ngo Tho The Impression of or ny mothers mother handwriting prior to tn my may IY release e chin aho said h is too ton dim dUn for tor me inc 11 to Identify de lie definitely finitely any an letter leter SIte She would not state een even to the time hl t of her knowledge nod belief that tho letter shown her bier hind hall been heon written by her mother say eny saying ing that n a 1 statement of ot that kind would bo be 10 tot too definite dellie for tor tho the objected object d to toa ton toa a n question ns as lS to tn whether Mrs Irs May Mar brick hUll hud received a I pardon paron from the tho British government but thin the witness nevertheless cautiously replied that she sho had huati papers In itt II her Given HI Yen her herby herby herby by the government Asked If it shin sho Iho were vero willing to produce them Item Mrs litre Mrs Maybrick replied with equal caution that they thoy wore were not mint It permitted to bo ho boI I produced d except lit LU the tho request of ot tho the thoI I American government On redIrect examination which wits was confined to ono nun question Mrs Mr May brick detailed the tho circumstance under which site she acquired 1 nn 11 Interest In tho thin property In II In dispute saying thAt lint nt nl her marriage her mother gave her ns itt 19 a mm I deeded gift gi nf ot her property Interest In anti West Seat Virginia and litter later Ilter unsigned n the same mimo Ilmo In writing The ho deed Ilo d and alli assignment sold said Ild Mrs litre r Jt had hind been confirmed repeatedly by b her mother up imp lP to tho ho present day by Jy word wont of ot mouth That Ih said fall Is in I the thus agreement that lint now exists between im tin 11 anti shin sho smilingly left lee tho thin stand |