| Show m DISCUSSING THE of Salt lake Takes Take 1 Rep cp a Issue With Hep l of tr HIS Nis ESTIMATE HOT CORRECT CORR t Salt Sall taker Laker FI that College Per Capita Exceeds That or of the University i ii i That nut the Agricultural col coliee merger Is to far tar from troll being wing a II dead tar it Is I lege iee tram from tho the discussion heard hoard hearden hoardon sue eue ue I Is evident hand honl There Thero are those who on en every fe fed 1 that the due Is In far from being solved and that while the tote late turo turn passed panned lu ed It up UI to Its the mailer trust must bo be out at nt an nn early date dais These Theeo people argue that the tho cost costor of or tWo Institutions sep MP separately U Is moro mora burdensome every year ear and ond that t the tM l must bo be bomel met mel fairly and squarely the matter er properly adjusted for tor nil time During I th the tho discussion In It the tho Legisla Legislature lure ture rn Hinted that the of ot Utah was war In an 1111 appropriation of at per capita caplin cal per per an annum nu the the Agricultural col colt WilS is Betting but 90 This state t tJ ment has hal been dissected by hy Hep S J r rl I tooke l cit ot Salt Snit Lake Ink who wio finds ands that the lawmaker front from In Inthe inthe the the tho amount ap lIP appropriated for Cor expensive supplies and which Instead of ot being but hut buta proposition ns 08 would an a Ii pt ar r from Crom the argument of of ot Mr Fish rish Fishburn turn burn burn will hill contInuo continue to do service for tor anti and thus become he come n lasting Knelt to 10 the tho state stale The Tho college collece per pur pta was ns not figured on this thia basis TO his argument eat Sir Ir Stool ey submits submits the follow following ing or OF UTAH Number of ot students In university proper Number of ot pupils In training school at al RI ale Number of oC students In kinder girton garton 60 50 number In III summer Jummer number of oC students U of ot V U Toni at nl late expense CX 1230 Tots Total eo copt cos t to state to for Cor general ml maintenance e apparatus and University of uC Utah tor 10 years Tast oat per capita for Cor two years Cost Coat per capita for ono one year yeat AGRICULTURAL Total enrollment Including taking special winter course courso 26 Total cost to for tor main for tor two y year arll Income Inome from federal to govern government government ment for tor two years t Total cost to and gr got v general nance anre n supplies etc t e bat ost Olt per capita for Cor or two onrA 1100 Cost ost per capita for tor one year In the latter estimate viz that show how showIng In Ing per capita maintenance figure of the A C 0 Mr figures In lit the tho thomm mm sum of ot SOMO which tho college will receive retlo from tho the federal government t during the iho next two years yearn oarl rho Tho cost COlt Kr ler capita c leaving out this Item hem Is shown MS itA follows Collos Total cost for tor general mabile name nance etc ale A l C for tor two years rears tare 00 Co Cost t per capita for far two years 00 Cost ost per capita for tor ono one year oar Difference In cost cOlli per capita U of at atIf i p If and ond A f t per VOl year In favor of oC tho the minus equals 16 Another estimate e made by I y Mr Ir Bloo Htoo dy key ey else alto favors tho the University of oC This Iti ts based en cn 11 the aggregate sums numa that each earn Institution will from fromell ell l sources as oa follows Total Income of ot University of ot plait lItah Including In Interest interest terest from state stale lands und fund Total otal Income of ot Agricultural college Including federal appropriation Cut Cost st per l er capita University ot of f Ilah two years 2000 0 Oo Ct Cost r per caplin University of ot Itah tuh ono one year r Cast CORt nt per p r capita Agricultural allege two 1100 Co Coat t per fir capita aplin Agricultural collie college ono coo year |
