| Show A PROPOSITION A proposition h has hall been presented to 10 tot t Iho tiro city council by ly th the l p tor lit In r fer nc to In on th time the Ulu street t of ot this thin city ell lie Ile cl call claims lm 1 thAt tho the busin line on the eu east t Ida aide of ot th the street from n a given Riven Iven point to some omo distance louth south extends extend n nearly n II toot foot beyond 1 tin Property lint aw and d 01 m I on Oil the sidewalk lit lie 11 recommends that the buildings building he be ordered moved t back to the property line Yv We AIe have havey y t heard of ot similar t t menU in III reK regard rd to I i the sidewalk line In front of ot property In III tame saute outer of ot the city ell De lib Defore 11 sore fore any ny action It Is in regard Ier rd tol to 10 l this mutter matter It would lie he III as well for tor tin tle I committee on 1111 streets to the right and lower of M the city In reference to in these then J Apart Alart from the It of rt rs stores torel and other on Tit it In street to br be moved afoot a It afoot foot fI nr or r to 10 tear down loan their frontage fronta o and andy andI y I l i N rebuild the Mime on the line designated i bv by y tin Ito surveyor Involving greet great 1 ex IX ext t pi In nw IIA i In IJ lb It and but hut very er t email iJ ml n j to the public It If say any It II 1 v iy ty Y rut qu HI whether the time then rn h n ar 1 I k 6 i ty y enforced TIle Tice t i may nu 1 h bu in Id apt to 10 minces In III front of or 11 IH y Ii I Tho The ris mt rt i puss pt l Ain gj II has b it j 4 t by tho the proprietors proprietor of ot those thos for tor a good l doal dO lI mora than seven ovon bears oc To nn nil ordinary render reader rooe r of ot the Iho statutes In III reference to this subject It II looks look in he ft though no M ono one cnn can disturb them thorn In that right Thora Fiore may IMY bo ho some somo beAring upon the tho question with which we and the general public are not but If tho the city olty lion hots the right nt Itt this lute late dale to 10 make a n now survey or to enforce an en old survey Y about which nothing has bus been slid sell or done Bona for tor moro more than the seven years provided d for tor by law after litter the Iho expiration ex lion tion of ot which no legal notion own oan de tle deprive deprive the of ot his hill rights then that there U Is a n screw narow loose somewhere that thI ought to 10 bo be adjusted Of Ot what benefit to h the thO public or to 10 tho the municipality would be the enforced rd re removal moval of or the tho building de ted a n afoot tool not to the rear No f that we e know of ot has hll boon been len by hy their of ot thu the ground now claimed for the tho sidewalk We do not 1101 believe there tens has bean lIeen any about It Il from the public mid and It U looks absurd to make this requirement after nil 1111 thin the years of or occupancy oc by 11 the tho pro proprietors of those thOM buildings building We Ne do not believe U It U Is lawful and It seems e nu very sure sur that It Is and soil unjust However we have no nu doubt that the thu committee e and the city ally council will thoroughly Investigate time tho matter both bath from front a 1 legal nail and n a moral standpoint |
