| Show PLEADS STATUTE ST A Of I Ils As ds ls a I defense to tho the complaint filed fed against him hint by ly R n n II Ander Anderson son Ion to recover possession of o the home homestead stead dead occupied 11 by himself and RII wife Mary rry M N H U II 11 1 chettle In III hs hll answer tiled le In the district court the he notion brought by the Iha receiver Ja J s barrod by the statute of ot limitations The answer anew r also aleo denies alt all Al of tho the al ai allegation allegations legations legation of ot the th complaint COi pin lit and the allegation that the tho deed con conveying to hue cheWer the tho delivered at nt the tle In question was wa not nt time of ot Its Il execution Aug 21 1881 1883 or 01 that the deed was Wa retained In Mr lr possession until May 26 1001 On the tho contrary It I IH is II alleged by Mr r and Ild hi hl hIs wife ife that the Iho deed ded was executed In good faith for Cor a ft good 01 and meritorious consideration and all wan scan M delivered to Mrs ll on AUK Aug Aul 21 1 It 11 1 Is U further alleged that tha thu rent real estate at that time did Ill not exceed the value of ot and nn was then Ihen and ever over rinee has ha been occupied by Mrs Mra tier ter antI ont her IS as s her home homestead stood stead At Al tho the time the tho deed was exe use executed execute cute tim tho answer states that Mr rr tier ter was vaa solvent and free tr o from Defendants Ask nak that the tho complaint bo ha dismissed and nd that they thoy be ho awarded their costs costa In the tho action |
