| Show DOGS fIGhTS UPHELD John the time of or tine the Ie nox at lit UI 11 Knit Seventy tt tr hut t street brought suit ault In the he York villa vOle Municipal court y yesterday agaInst W v Grant Or Duff DillY a 1 tenant for 1 GO 50 being helm the rental of at apartments for forthe forthe or orthe the month of August The fhe Iff net forth that the tine letup leSe did not expire I until Sept 1 7 but that he lie moved out nut August 7 The Tine plaintiff objected to the th pres presence Inc ence of ot Mrs Airs Duffs pot pet sky ky terrier on omu the tine and aimS 30 so my m client had to got get It out auld said defendants dete counsel A landlord la is Justified In objecting to the presence of dogs dog do In Iii his hie l loue ou c rejoined the other counsel Mr Ir Duff produced a copy COllY of at the lease and hi his lawver read from It These Thene The to be occupied liy hy two adults nd a n dog This clog doir had all the tine rights anti and privileges 1118 of H II according to tine the loft leAse and anI tilE the lie landlord could not ob oh object to Its It I presence declared Justice Herman lIerman Joseph Tine Tho defendant ellid eId that he ha had lied moved because l tho the landlord hind hall not supplied all of at the articles us its set down In the tine There Thue wore snore only two In iii tho the apartments Do you mean to say any that the Ins dog ilog was entitled to a I spoon IbO the tho court a Tho Tine O ease CASC B vai lS va left loft to the tho Jury ur who wino promptly brought In n a for the tine defendant Ney York Sun |
