| Show J T f FOR FIFTEENTH T W Wl ARDI For l or the Third Time It H Wins Case Brought by y It H Against Helen Watson Wotson FOR RECOVERY OF PROPERTY I Land Was Wag Left to Ward Vard by b George and Defendant Alleged Undue For the third time Judge hell Hall today tody rendered Judgment In favor faor of ot plaintiff In lit the of or tho ito corporation of ot the members of ot the tho Church ot of Jesus Chrit t of Saint residing in lit the Fifteenth ward against Helen Watson for tor forthe forlie the lie recovery of tho the possession ot of part of lot Jot 4 block SI st pInt plat A Halt Bait take Luke City dUrvy which Wan to the by b George just before luis his death teath On two former trials nuts judg ment fluent ws vas also rendered In lit favor of ot plaintiff but each tAch limo It Ct appealed led to the tho Supreme court und and the lie judgment of ot the tho lower hewer court was reversed ed with Instructions to grant crant a new trial Time The defendant Is la the tho daughter of ot Mrs Irs by a 1 former husband and she sho he claims that undue Influence was used by the authorities of ot the ward ivard in n In Itt lr to give tho the proper property ty to tho the ward arid further that lie lio nu was not lot of sound mind at It the time lime he lie ex cx executed c the ii deed eed H It was Vos shown by the thu testimony that Mrs agreed to her husband deeding the land to tho lImo thord vard rd providing that she abe 9 should have haven haveIt n It 1 life lIfo estate In lit the santo annie anti should be allowed to live there Jele during the re ii ot of her life lite without paying any Iny rent remit After the lie deed woe executed n it leas was Wal drawn up tip whereby Urn the prop orty otty wits wn leased lon ell by b tho the ward officIals to toMiS Mrs MiS Chat Held for lor or the remainder ot of her tier life lito at the nominal rental ot of I 1 per vcr your After ACter Judgment was first r t rendered for Cor plaintiff an appeal was Willi taken anti and tho thio supreme court reversed the decision on the tho ground that tho thu execution of it a lease to III Mrs Mis eld nt at n mu rental was In Imi violation of ot the provis provisions lOllS ions of ot the transfer of ot the tho property by Mr to the tho Church wherein his lii widow was WI to be bo allowed to live hive on tho the property for tor life lite without tho pay payment meat ment of ot any rent ren A new ne trial was no ac accordingly cordingly ordered Upon the tho trial the court re ye refused fused to allow nil ow defendant to 10 Introduce testimony only upon certain matters mattera concerning co the ease case e and lid did not allow her to put flut In all of ot her testimony In Introduced nt at the first trial Judgment was again rendered ren In favor of ot plaintiff and upon appeal lo to the tho supreme court COUll the tM cave case was Us agaIn reversed upon the ground that the lie court erred In refus refusing ing in to allow defendant to Introduce nil nilor of or her testimony just JURt Iho ihie same as liS asit it was wn the tho III t and original trial of the tho case calle The Tho third trial of 01 the caso ease com cant commenced before Judge Hall on Monday anti and was Vall concluded this morning when judgment was again rendered d In favor of ot plaintiff as n stated above |
