Show ADMISSION Of OfT T f Tf n lt l Bill 01 to Admit Amit the thc lie Four as Two Stales States Hotly Debated in il inThe The he House 1 IT I BECOMES A PARTY MATTER MATER Delegate Wison of Arizona Opposed The 1 he Union Un tOi of Ills Ils Territory with New Mexico April ID Soon after aCe the thi hOM met today Mr lr Ir Dalzell of oC presented 11 a rule ruin for tor tho Immediate consideration tol of ot the th state hood lood till Following a it brief explanation of tf thu tue hUb bill LII by t Mr Mt II I MI Mr of ti 1 P I II the Hie lh minority iii I nail t leader ed that Ihal II t iii hilt bill bi wits Wil but hut a 1 to s the tIme of tr the territories for fol admission ti lii lol Ho 10 I Ic ex Pressed ned the tl opinion flu a aI that I hi itt t hO Its Iambi had hun 1 no nn Idea f I mug tho tIl I lie bill bi ii ii I at lt it t that t t tl sIt ILli or orn orIn II In n fact Cat any an Idea that It I would woul at cit atall ill all iti I The bil ii iii ho said sit I I s Ira lIY Wil up its upI II iI I OH to hI 0 the lie 0 and ashen to the time taste tall and offered In Iii II such Midi n a form that Ihl 1 It I known beforehand It not receive tho the cud of ot tho ll ml lu In I a opposing the retie Mile Ille Mr Moon Momi that t t the til t Ii e bill bil bi I was isas an 11 it a iii I e h y wicked and a pat jut I titan Iran an measure rt which st ii iiii If t IC et would violate the plighted faith and honor of or the tho United States to the thel Five l I Civilized of ot Indians In the mutter matter of or treaty obligations He lie Inquired of uC the If IC they 11 were Store W going to 10 purs the Ihl bill hi In II vio viii violation 10 lation of ot their party platform and ald of or treaty obligations time The territorial It delegates of time the house ho hI maintained had hall protested until the th hours hour of tt coercion by liY b the to 10 muted meet political exigencIes Denying tutu that till tho hul bien bemi guilty wit of or bad hit faith Mr tr Dalzel said sall hue Iho bill 11 would lake Its course in Inc ina 11 a it I party pl rt because It wits was 10 rc ported potted by the I majority of lt tho tIm commit tec He Ce submitted to tu n a party pirty par caucus and brought Into Inlo the houM hou t pursuant to a i tUh ul adopted by the tho caucus He lie I Justl Justi jU II tied hell the tl on Ott 01 the th ground that we wc RIO are endeavoring to 10 the tue relative power of the and house hou n of or representatives In iii II ton Mr dr Ir Powers Potters Pow Me ti Ip defended the bill bi which he lie furnished tIme the only solution of or the Iho statehood question that hind had any I a n imy prospect of passing the Con Congress COl ConIn gress gressIn In 11 opposing the union of n Arizona and New Nest Nr Mexico Mr Ir 1 01 of ot de tie declared d that such union against fallt the will wi of ot the people was ultra radical n a policy and ami was wan a II political revolution In both legislation tend and policy pol C CIn In a I brief speech In support of at tho the bill Mr r Curts of Insisted that the tho Indians of 01 the Vise Five Civilized mini the whites of oC Indian territory worn I ready for or statehood unit and that t to per pH percent percent cent of oC the Indiana were in itt II favor tor of oC Joint statehood with wih Oklahoma OklahomA While hll stating t that the lull bill hi did nut not ex ox nelly achy to tm his hili e of or what wha wan Wil wanted by b I the people of fr Mr MI tr McGwire McGuir of ot Oklahoma declared that should If It puss there would not bt II a H H vote solo 01 against It I either cither In iii II Oklahoma or nl Indian territory t n opposition to tn th t he ho bill hi clInic cinno from ln of nC California who while entering no ito n protest against t tIme the th union art of or a f Oklahoma Oklahoma Oh iii and Ild it ad Indian territory vigorously attacked 1 the th pro proposition position po for tOI Joint statehood of f Arizona and NOW New Mexico Mr Ir lutRell of Texas criticised the tho plan plait rl n lot for f tIme the division of nC tho the delegates to time tho the constitutional convention of oC tho the state stat e of ot Oklahoma Oh holl which sub ilI he lie lI lall pro pio on the rule rulo of eliminating from the tho th population of ot Indian territory the tho Indian of or the tho Five Jho Civilized tribes tribe Mr 1 alI nl of Ohio was WM oi en I In lii lilt Ills l of or disapprove of the tho thol bill l but hUL raid fill that as IS the United States wis tai n a I country of parties and Ind HS as 11 par liar HUH spoke through h the tho caucuses 1 ho would vote ole te for fOI time the bill hi TIo Th wan lit hI Mr Ir U of New Nets Mexico i who ii saW said a Hut li while the tho bill did elkI not the tho r people of C his hl territory they the 1 In 11 It I Ho le I I e explained cx nut I ned In II I mm m gren ul I detail rl lct u I I tilt tho th cc t of or both Am Izona his hiM own 01 territory and 1111 Inquired Inquire I nl I Irl If I alone alono were to tl support u a pop 1111 11 U lit lou He lt 1 1 obtained abbe limed 1 o tn he lie 11 cited New Ness e Yok City CI with wih Its Il groat nat population lit t ion which ho h a bald Id did Li not aoL IO pro 1110 produce duce delco dUt a Il Delegate Wilson of oC Arizona nuked asked If I New 1 ew Mexico with all ni her resources would not Ii cit 1 i iid ti statehood stiLt to which Mr Mm 11 Hodey if I piled that th t his hi views It H wore Store ore well steil known and Ild that If I the time did di not like Ilko Ik the tho they time had tho time privilege of It down ns its ni tho the election expenses wore were to lo bo be betin e tin hi by h the t hit government eat Ho 10 I he predicted prod that In II 1010 New Mexico co ru would Stout 11 hl It a u population 1101 Ci lit I ion of n f 1000 and lull ii close I with ti I I It M r n i pica idea for Cor or the t Ii o of tho time bill hi time Tho third t hi t I tu g of ot ii I tho t ho bill hi I Imd hul been h bee cn a directed by h the tw speaker whereupon Mr sir Ir Moon Inquired If Ir thin tho third road hut Iut ton al to 10 be he by hy title itle tile t only In III 11 the midst t of 01 an un elaborate lt 1 tho thi I I r m I turned t ti rued to tho the parliamentarian arI lit t aria a al Mr h l i Hinds I i I nil s for fOI further I iiiI 1115 I t ami then I announced t hun I hi lie hI would rl rend olo to ho whole question III iti 11 favor fator fl of ot the th In ha Individual hati ti minI privilege lint I I age of each othi lh member macin tier any it fly flyat at e of whom st hOI toti Id tho the rend rending ing IIA of the tho bill hi Mr 11 h I Williams ii bitt as the I hi e nil ma i nor muon t r leader I atI cc J II fl Inquired I I Ill tt I red If Ir I I the he t s du Ill duel II el ci i Ion i had Imd been nit ived at lt tier oCter a con consultation rOi I to I I oil Th rh rims flen promptly replied that It Il liMl hl been hel et he the t house se In lii II an 11 up uproar uproar ti roar when whon hr hI ii p added The ht aki lied pier par pIl who uvito linn been heen nt ret this thin deA dek de k for fO tim many years yearn can give II the ito hail chair anul after a C pause I anti tho the gentleman from ruin Mississippi cards and spades and amid Ild then have hil a it 1 fountain of or parliamentary knowledge o loft l ft It I was WIK some caine HOlh moments moment before the which greeted this HII II Mr Ir Ma Maddox of ot time the tl reading of ot tho time bill hii which was wal begun but later hater ho lie 10 with stills withdrew drew cow his request rlue t Speaker I further convulsed tho the when hll he un hf nuked t J Is H there any nl hit gentleman who desires the bill hil read reutel rI 7 No one the tho bill hii Wt 17 to IO u ju I strict parly vole tite nt rime Tho report on Uie Ume tural bill bi by Mr Wads Wadsworth worth of ot New Ness York A senate concur concurrent concurrent rent resolution WitH to In accept nc pt I i g t lie Invitation I it t Ion of ot tho I ho ofra of ft tin th I in Pun ha o to nl at It attend tend the opening of ot thu time talc |