Show J The Tho Louisville en on endorses n Threes es H a 1 statement by a II Fn Pa that the tho Hook Doak of or Mar Mor Mormon mon moo l Is III but bulan an amplified copy gf of 1 the so culled manuscript foi which Sidney lIln y lUgdon tons responsible rC Tho The Journal ways says In lam parts part After Atter the of ot Mormon Murnon published by b Smith she hl Mm hers H Rpt u 1111 II 1 published 1 a it 1 state stale ment meal of ot the tho nets facts anti claimed that t had copied nor her tofu It U has hns been shown that after got the tho copy cop of ot hook book ho quitted the printing mid began 1 to tu preach the doctrines g of or tho Iha hook h ok In III 1823 h ht he lIh Smith the tn contention ID is that hi he u gave gate hint the manuscript from which he h rend read ort off the pretended inundation of ut the tilt Inscription on 1 the till gold with suck Mich and us fie emitted his hili The rime fh H amid tilt the printed Hook of or Mormon were wel amid Identity though It It Ls nut not billed thAt there Ihm era All 11 thin thle wax was fully rully threshed out by hy Oaf Odd i of or newspapers and nl of oC thud thul period and sumo sane yom or oars Inter colt rou o ue of or tho testimony given It will ho bo seen by this that tho the minister and the Courter aro behind their times They rhey fhe rely reh Oil on the theold old eld straw threshed out by b public dh ago In III utter oblivion of ot more moro recently discovered mete facts They ote on this thin question Just ns as na no tho mho out preacher r who to tho mho last that the tho Ih sun stilt do move the lime manuscript theory hail hatt been abandoned by b nil whose opinion I la III entitled to consideration for the Him alum Vie pic reason edema lint the manuscript ns ON Is Isnow I Ino now host no well known linn has been boeh found anti and published stud lint It c ly upset upa t lint theory The rime document wae discovered by I Mr Ir Fim president of the college Ohio On the thee e authority of or the tho fables H hint cir dr circulated 65 66 y years ars ago uso and swum to lo by h false witnesses eH the Journal en that tho ho Spaulding Hp und and tho ho printed nook Hook of Mormon were n rl rland end and their Identity establish ed d The Tho was wag lost lost By fly whom was wan then Ihen the tho comparison mode made and anI when The tact U Is that lint when tho the document Anally II n 1111 wan one found It was wan seen to 10 bo be In every essential and In ev ov every cry ery detail too different from tho the Hook of Mormon Marmon Those who endeavor to 10 trace this lute sa so sacred cred creel volume to mho tho mutton mOM script arc are 66 15 years yearn behind their time Modern Modem skeptics vary ur ho tho taboo fablo anti say eny that Runt the tha 1 of the time Hook of ur Mor Mormon moon mon one riH not nol that story but another Spaulding story lor which no one on however ha hill has ewer ever seen scan le n end and lint It was Willi doctored doctore t up 1111 by h Sidney Risdon This guess hot haw been ventured ed since the tho theold old ohl myna WOH proved false aloe ral Doubters must of or course account time the boot best way they ran Inn for Cor tarts which h lacy thoy tho to III believe holl It U Is III not so long they Iho for tor iho the New No Tea lament by b It Il to ho be the Iho Work of ot crafty priests for rOl selfish ad nd advantage vantage op or for state purposes That old alii notion IK is not morn false nice linn thon tho the theother other that thul wan the time author of oC tho time hook of oC Mormon Marmon All the world admits lint the Prophet Joseph could not nOl havo hlO written that thai book nt at tho the time limo It II appeared History proves that nel net timer her not had any uny anything thing timing to do tie with lIh the authorship Whence cane time tho olum No wonder tho mho world Is 18 disturbed at al It I It appears like the Iho loiters letters on the tho of or the pal pali palace ace of ot with n II solemn lIol Ing In tho the midst of ot revelry No wonder HO so 0 tinny many try nol not to see 1110 It |