Show iJ S Sr r mm HAnn Rund Answers for Ills His t Stalled IntO ds on m tS THE IN THE CASE CASER Furnished the Salt R t lAke as Rid I cu I OilS J false 10 tM E tIt to J be el rc on part ot when contributing news SS In Lake City to I I 11 when writing fIC ae 1111 ot In tho company In con can Jo 1 Ih mu h ot gov I tUh lake scheme sc h crne h eso In w turn t m not only a I in An untruthful light Inti loul th Illat t till are Iro a II lot of ot p d r Is vho aro not equal to In intelligence or com 1 c aeo te ask tha hat t sp 1 0 s1 ven I t paper for Cor the Ill f few f w tram from the view LM U o of f the he obstructionists as 1111 our ourn n 4 i 0 Madly term us mr In the Herald Herold for Cor h 1 whereIn wu Wo aro aru told tola that at f mating of the stockholders of 01 the company at AVest a March 3 tho J Ibe government that 11 jt the government I pr t Cannon made ma e nn earnest Su forth for the sd of ot the proposition Ki r by th the other canals can s and that t at attire Am tire were e tut bul ten who voted In favor ta or of this ct viz Iz M O second feet teet of ot la of ot the primary rights of or tach unal but th y battled bravely bm ely tut tor with Mr theIr brethren ih Ih would net Mt and re tuti Imd to 10 see 8 the light and that a motto to 10 accept 65 second l voted down The jit 1001 certainly only took D Ut brain of the writer FACTS IN TIlE THE CASE The Inith of the matter Is simply t till At t a of at the Bouth Jar Jor JorI I to C ul company com ran held at lit West Jar Jor Jarn n Mu h H 11 at which mealing tho to accept act lIt M second feet teet of ot niter la In place of tha primary rights of ot I the Ih final was u rejected some held out outto to r Ji feet t and ind a compromise was as final ecle M tiO feet teet Later IMer tho 1 tier called another I for tor U tJ to reconsider t uj ad dry nuy supposed that every stock I Jet will Imply slide Into Inlo line j no O questions The Tho results how I Int ver ler quite to tho contrary contra R At 1 A l meeting of at tho stock of or the South Jordan Canal com W ll d by order of ot the president 1 it at tit Jordan Itah March 23 1904 it 11 a 1 m the tho following reso res Itea adopted i bum canal companies viz Iz Itah and Halt East Enst J I iI agreed to 10 accept 60 sec J c niter Ier o tl each canal in lieu X their ry rights In n Utah Lake ad and Th The decree of ot the courts t to the canals fil hundred plus fwd lett of ot water which would be ot lake Inke at further by IW the tho Installation th p tiring plant 00 second feet teet of or tIt a to the above COO wn low h or the t 1 mid developments tha th flow of ot the South Jordan W 1141 for tor irrigating season of ot 1901 from I to 10 o October tober 16 covering a ai I i W of ot days was practically SO 51 fm led relL be It That WP WI the tha stockholders Jordan Conal company In lilt our Knit and Interests ns Of t I IY y luv hu been decreed d creed to us by b the II d In lake anil tC aB bl to r to bo 11 r hat we tha 1 B Jorunn Canal 1111 I company do not 10 obstruct the tho Improve on known lis tho gov fur I the development of ot If It on frel of 1 45 feet teet of ot water willer the De loc bo for thc Ihl S t aal company wo 0 are lIn lo aC It M 8 teet of at wat watt rights t i that our rIghts t maln nR 01 an nn pi 81 allY mrm Ia called 0 t Ar was present pre f lie 11 sri IKI IT hs will ho U C nt wilier th b T Cannon Canno ln In a long It not con I JI by I t who also O 1 I were tho only o I IO wort i M th t III tho 11 er I 11 1 tr N of at March 21 to r Jr r list 1 11 I It three II J l K In favor tavor clev It I 11 lf It the minorIty I n V a th lit It t was certainly i ill Ym nl for fOI the Were U 1 r V IIA Marys Nl 11 n 11 h for tor WA 1 HEm I V of Ia 11 t I for Cor tho over t 11 J i t o t t the l n i Ii r to 10 the water of at 1 Utah lake Inke rights that have been de dc decreed creed to Us Ue by b the COU IB to devel ope which we have suffered and tolled for tor SG years Y ars Would any an business man do what they us to do Iz relinquish nil all their business Interests Interest to the govern goern government ment and receive a 1 paltry holt half In re return r turn This is I what the present owner olner Is to do dOj In other words the government agents fay ny to him If It you OU will wll give mo 10 lOot of your our nice ret red apples wo 10 will give ghe you In return I Tho courts havo decreed that tho canals ore are entitled to second feet teet which Is the discharge of Utah lake at compromise point wo have since de developed eloped feet Ceet below low water mark making a If total of ot feet teet That this Is ours who will deny den The before mentioned resolution only calls for tor 80 feet teel for each canal or n total of ot OO for tor the five Canals in lelu of oC our primary rights as described above aboc leaving second feet teet or enough to Irrigate acres which If It fold nt 19 per acre would make a n sum lum of at SOO 00 nil all that Is required to pay for tor tho proposed government plan Every ery dry farmer would gladly pay tho price for tor water wlter to irrigate his land Bait Lake City would be only too glad to Increase her water supply at that cost Why h then should we give up all our rights receive a paltry 60 feet teet to each canal In return NEEDS OF SALT LAKE Bait Lake City Is now In a n condition where she must mURt secure n larger supply of at or she will cease to grow gro and her business Interests must puffer nrc countless acres of ot land landIn In III this and Ind surrounding counties which would Increase Immeasurably In value nille by Irrigation but why wh we II ok should tho present water owner relinquish Is already his and then buy It back at nt the Iho price asked of ot him who sacrifices nothing Why should there be saddled addled upon his hiI shoulders rs nn nl enormous debt of otono one million dollars for tor the benefit of ot the business man mall of or Snit Salt Lake City and tho thop speculator p Why should he mortgage his home that the tho dry dr farmer and the tha land grabber many prominent and wealthy residents of ot Salt Lake Inke City own Im Immense mense tracts of ot land In Salt Luke Lake counties may have hn water to 10 Irrigate the tho thirsty soil and thus thUA gain n 0 fortune tort line by hy tho others sacrifice Why should he awny his hlA Inherit Inheritance ance for tor a 1 mess of oC pottage t 1 MAKE MAIE HASTE In conclusion I will say SIY let us look nl nt these theR matters calmly let us make haste slowly and not hove have to repent nt It our leisure If It the action of ot the tho stock stockholders holders of tho South Jordan Co will servo to 10 check the speed peed nt which certain persons have been heen forcing this project t along If IC It will give tha tho people time Ume to consider thoroughly then to vote vole conscientiously It has hns doni well ell Yours for Cor the A Ft |