Show R T I K WILL WIN Idaho nho Attorney Relieves the Utah Senator Will Retain Ills His t Sent Scat i I GIVES HIS VIEWS ON 1 THE E CASE CASEl l f I 1 All Things Thing d the thc Mor lor Mormons lorr mons 1 Done lIone I r tf ably abl Well it f ii I t The Tho Anaconda of or Monday liNt I In n t Judge W K N Borah of 0 Heine one oue of ot J the ablest and of or Idaho and HI who ho IB III of It counsel for 1 whose neat In tho United 11 Is being I I In III Ji 01 legal business Is III register rd Id nt nl the Thornton hotel hotot Judge arrived and expects to bo b here for u IL nl 1111 whon he will go goto goi i to Helena llo Is known in III Mon Montana ll tana and particularly In and He J t run wh ro he personal po Ho IH III n 11 prominent factor rile tor In jh Republican politics In Idaho Idillio and was 1111 M tho choice his hla pally for tal tho Iho Hulled I I count whon hn lin was defeated I if i i liy b tho Iho Hey burn Whether will 1111 go to toi It i to In tho Iho defense of 1 i d Smoot IH III u II Ho nu stated i last night that ho would to rn If Itu u certain i f of or tho which he ho would not notI I mention was tho understanding ho h had hd he en Id When the tho wan taken up lIll by the tho senate Investigation committee It was 1 I i od rl that It would 1 drag alone for ro and that till tho of or I 1 would not nol ho necessary In Wash Washington ington tho phase referred to toi i come up II fl If that dor dorl l t come up JUlIg according to toi i hm IIII agreement will go nt once n o to the Aid RIe of ot tho Iho man mau whose right 1 j to tn a neat In tho sonata to Is 18 being pro lIra prot t i tested THINKS TimmS HK JI WILL UK HI 11 the opinion lost last night Hint lived Smoot would be he 1 seated In the tho He lie talked Inter fittingly and logically on the subject and Hot lIel forth reasons rell ons why he hI hIi 1 i thought tho United Statia B lI te would I 1 not unseat any an man simply because b he ho hou u was a Mormon Ho the light In I not l hut I ho tho Mormon and thai he ho says sa 8 IK from ho fact that while hl It la Is made to appear tho ti ID III fur rol tho of IHK It has already been boen con COil conceded ceded redell l 11 y thu Protestants that Reed Heed h Is not living In polygamy think IH III n nil 1 III why Reed Smoot be for rel being b lnA a 11 Mormon Until there la III lathat that Hour Hoar he o u n II nr a 11 He mil hat he It of at course menus thit provide ull Smoot docs not lot violate the law nl If lie Iho senate commit leo co cannot hut Herd tt Into plural hald that ho holOn lOn hi to bo hi to oath i of or obliga obligation tion In the then they tin un mat him simply nf his hla religious which If It within tho of law la w H Ii his hili constitutional con right and right It f every eer citizen under tho loit of or the tho ur lias been bren polygamy and IH hi mill 1111 H gamy l ut there have A cry ot tt fe marriages the Ih of mo Think of too luo Tho nrc lIN u 1 people hn been beon for yearn to 10 believe Unit polygamy I Is IB right nil 1111 of nt u 1 comes n II manifesto prohibiting the practise I B nON I consider what It suddenly to bo forced to tn CIo up liP tho I of or u n part lart and u salient part ut lit that ot C one belief a belief libeller which had existed ox lilted for po many Yen Ill wo 0 to consider It tho Mormons ht o done well I do not to tn bo ho understood ax nil being an e of ot or other that IH In violation nf law lilli but I hold that lor without polygamy as 18 it IH III etl today Is as nB deserving of nH nil recognition UH any 1111 other religious The n of a I few yeah yeats ago Agn the tho case caso of ot Heed Hed Smoot are by no 1111 means analogous Roberta ns nil I under understand uld r stand it II wan wn an tin acknowledged f o but I ho contended CO lit e 1111 Nt that Ills plural marriages nil ull took tok P before the manifesto tn of ot 1800 it 1111 Is con conceded ceded by b the tho that he ho has hns no plural has been bee II Introduced Intro In the way ln of or evi evidence dence to attempt to show ho v anything to tn tho contrary because U It Is hi known that such a 1 charge cannot be he proved Then tho light Is III the church I Ito to that exists not with lINt Smoot hut ere und that la Is lanot not denied Tho 1111 only denial Is III that have been b coun countenanced by lIy the Iho Church testo Surely It would nut bo of n man who had several So lal wives that ho give 1110 them nil up but bill one when the manifesto went forth Who of or the tho abandoned wives h s 1111 tl lr children who had hod been legally wedded to A man according to their NL the current 1 1 talk that there Is 18 n likelihood of an nil Independent puny JimIY in Idaho e of or tho Mormon a tics lion Judge Horah Borah had tho following to tobay toI bay I Thu Smoot Investigation UH n you OU suggest hUll has given prominence to the Mormon Monnon question In our state to some lIone extent and It you think my views of Qt I have no objection to your our having them in tho Hie firm place I 1 think U It Is per Iler perfectly safe Hate to any SO that tho Independent party movement up In n will not In Idaho Wo 0 no room for tOl It In III our politics So far as I am lIlt Individually concerned I would not accede to It for tor a 11 moment anil while hero thero Is considerable cOll talk tho matter I 1 It not think many Republicans will ever eel con consider shier sider It ItA As A to the question of or of or Mormons It will 11 In III my III Judge judg menu never take In 11 Idaho U H would ln MI 11 manifestly to net et about an nn entire people of the alleged acts of or that It would not could not lIot Individually I think 1111 talk of Is a founded upon wholly holl unjust pW I there rc arc prominent Republicans who say fluy this IM tho Iho only solution Home pi eminent Demo Democrats too hut bIll I do not bloc believe It wilt will least I 1 III thoroughly opposed to It I run ran only for my As a 1 Republican I J pay no man bo 10 because ho Is 18 u and II IP should oe denied on 1111 alike or nIl right of citizenship be because cause capS he ho Is a 1 Mormon POLYGAMY IN IDAHO I Ikno tt As fl to existing In Idaho I 1 know kno of o plural since the manifesto a n 0 It Is III claimed there thero have hava been pome hut but 1 I have been among tho Mormons 1 In UIO practise of my profession sion for tor 10 years and I never known of nn instance In Thoro arc aro whom the ho manifesto found with moro marc limn one olle wife but I 1 do It I not know of any nil plural since tho hut If It everything i tuio Is III claimed d dby by th se most aggressive the tho remedy Is III not In an Independent narty movement or In iH i One Is la the wholly unjust t and can You the Smoot I Prefer lire Cor not to speak further about that When tho commit fee a aUl m Ul the of or right tb ro re rotain tain his B a at nt nud when It gets around to the real question Ij come new light one onea come So far May a or the tho other may th t question t docs not to hlo In tho Isnow nOW try trying tryIng ing the t e Church |