Show NOT TO Hi lit WON We have havo already mentioned mistakes In the hurried manic made by b reporter of ot the tho th Investigation lUon nt ot Washington anti sent cent over the tho wires tu la lathe the tho prose press When they the are lire palpable or er 11 errors rove either In III transcribing or transmit transmitting transmitting ting and give gle wrong Impressions they ought aught not to 10 be he published without cor COl correction r either In the tho text or by ac accompanying companying explanation One Ono very cr pronounced mistake of ot this thie kind Ind Is In regard to 10 the family status of ot President Joseph F I Smiths two lO counselors anti the two latest appointed Apostles Treat Smith Is la reported as 08 assaying assaying saying they thy lire are reputed to 10 be the tho husband of ot more than one wife Thle he Ito certainly could not nol have haa stated slated Neither of ot the th gentlemen referred rt to Is IH IsKO IHo isen KO en o reputed The fhe error li Is evidently tho limo reporters or the tho word not nol has hns been omitted In dispatching nut Hut the tho Tribune features feature the tho blunder and em en emphasizes pha It I OB nil ono one of If a number of at I trained framed and enlarged alleged utterance of ot President Smith In these worle of ot Hi its own The first counselor now flow M Is It John H R Winder lie Ho and ft nil his fellow ellow and two Apostles leave have been bee II appointed since Mr Ir Smith president pre They The Theore are ore reputed to 10 be the husband of ot more than one wife The In the name lime frame speaks S of ot one of these 10 apostles an as n having n a wife and children but bullA Ift is not nota a polygamist It Is I well known In III this Ihl community that the other oilier three gen lion gentlemen thus mentioned ore are to lie he classed In ins the same category ns as the thc referred to 10 The same paper r makes strained lt ef of efforts torte forts every ever tiny to 10 prejudge the tho case cane ell e and makes not only Irrational deduc deductions lions from the partial evidence given ghen but gross of ot both fact rind and conclusion Of Ot course that Is IA noth nothing Inc ing In now new und mind judging from Its record Is IA only what might be he expected nut Hut the reading public should be cautious about depending upon either Its assertions I or 01 orits Itt its Is arguments argument |