Show WOULD um m Till rah HYMN liniN According to the Now Nes C Bedford Stand Standard ard Nov lies Anna Annl Shaw Shan at It tho the Na Nn National Woman convention protested protein prot against the expression Our Fathers l God Clod In our our national 11 I hymn To address s tho the Almighty ns as our Fathom Gai she argued a II die dis discrimination dl crimination against tho the feminine To 0 remedy this terrible Injustice to time the th I women It 1 was 1111 proposed to change the time lino IIno to Our rather Father l fad Oud to Theo Thee It would be he Interesting to learn by what logic the tho reverend r lady makes out Olt that the Iho latter expression is III no dis dla discrimination crimination against the tho feminine It If tho the line Our Fathers pod Clod to thee thel U Is such sueh discrimination tho the amend amended ed lime lino Our father God to tp l thee U Is t still moro more no so since it e only fatherhood In the tha Deity and no moth motherhood motherhood Tho The amendment robs robe the tha line lino of ot the tM beautiful b thought conveyed that tho the God Gad O d wo we supplicate Is le the tho God upon whom our ancestors relied and no other and It does doe not In tho the slightest lightest remove move f the he alleged objection to It Wo cannot call not believe bellove that the ladles ladies generally In sympathy with a 1 silly proposition lion tion like Ilke that They know In III the thu t Q lan Inn language guage of the old joke that It I la is per reedy well understood under t OI that our fath fathers ers era embraced our mother mothers and that tha tho author ot of our Ur national hymn had no Indention hs of discriminating against the tho ladles |