Show w f JUDGE HALLS DECISION There Thero appears to 1 b 0 ml standing of ot tho decision rendered by hy Judge fudge W C Hall hail In the thu URe of It 1111 lilt on oil vs the tho text of ot which was w s published In tho the leeret n News on Sat Slit evening Atil lI which Ii h line liris i been commented upon by br our local 10 11 contemporaries Tnt rh that Judge Stall ruled that In Is not a 11 mar inar marriage Is Incorrect ns as may milY bo ho readily reou reen by hy reading tile his hl till full opinion It I t Is also nn on error to say that the tho District Judge tho tim of ot the Iho Su BU prue court Tho The suit full before the court In III this In lii n a now rase It U hUll had to be 50 heartS heard aitt decided on Its merits Mrs drs Hilton sued uell for III 1 property In lu possession I of ot W V 8 a obtained by deed front from John It n Irk This fill ns defended Rad In lii the tho courso of tho trial now nev tes ten 1111 hearing upon tho relations raid eald to 10 have luwe existed between MM MIsi Mra lilt 1111 ton and Dr lr 1 1 The chief question nt nil to In tho nature tit nt tho the ceremony by Jy President Daniel 11 H Wells ut itt tho tIm supposed 1 deathbed of or Miss lt II II Ar milage After Arter hearing the evidence on both lOth sides eldes and the tho arguments of or tho the attorney the tM th judge tool took the matter under unit ami on Saturday ren rendered dered lerell his hla decision based ha ell upon tho time evi el evidence dence tho the In this par particular case The fhe turning point In that decision la Is lathat that ceremony to of lit the tho Miss f Dr eternity only onty ind therefore It was nut not n m nt at com coin common mon maim law no us It related only to 10 the Iho worM world to co conic mo Slut Jut the court decided 11 that tiLe the fact had hud been established that In the tho Mormon Church there limo were kinds of ot seal Ings or marriages namely For Tor I ot time only for COl time and eternity for tor eternity only Tho The and ami second were recognized ns N marriages H nt at the third was sas OR not viewed us n rt legal IKUI for this thin world and was there thero therefore therefore fore rore beyond the tho purview of or the tho court being J purely n a religIous religion or spiritual ceremony And nd this the tho court ruled hud hall been dissolved by mutual content conent lIt ns as n shown In the tIte document commonly lolled called n a 1 Church Cli divorce Therefore the tho decision Is that no mar maar marriage ut ot which the law lall takes vas ll Into by b the lie parties named nil II consequently the plaintiff him hari Ima no rights to the ProPertY In III by lJ reason lenson of or the tho claim that Stint silo aha Is tho the widow willow of ot Dr Ur Pink Purk Now Noll ns as to the decision of ot the tho Supreme Court curt ourt In III n II former CASO eise Judge Hall tins has not nol undertaken to set eel aside n a rut tul Ing t of or the higher court ourt lie He Is 18 too ton good gooda n a lawyer jurist to attempt to 10 do that Ho lIu has hns simply decided d the tho pres present S cat ent lit ease case according to In his ItIs lIt of or ortho tho the bearings of or the evidence adduced therein Of Ot course hla hi rulings are nrc open to tho time opinion of 1 the court co rt t If thu present cose ase Is carried there and no doubt the learned lea mit cI justices II s III I I I view It In the Site light of the Iho new nel evi wi evidence wilie dence leOce lie lice presented the tho conclusions of oC the Utu court coUlt below Judge J tnt go I I nil in III I a approving tig the lie I haul of the commission appointed to 10 op 01 praise o the tho left letl by h Or tr I Park and apportion thu t which the Iho former decree allotted allot ted to Mrs Irl t re Hilton I I Il ton did not Ii lug Ing In III opposition to his hit In III this title C use He lIu III tarried curried out the or order der ilet n approved a what t the t In coin flit hint had been required red to per perform perform form It rt was IM ae a 1 pio r thing tu to do 1111 under the 1111 a mid therefore t not lIot tnt with w It ii his hi It I s opinion o 1 a ain In the tho lie latest Intent t suit under We o presume the end III li is nut not yet 1 In lit tho over 11 to of ot thu tho lata 1 or and valued iitti ott citizen Or 1 John It i t Park |