Show T THREE f SUPREME r M MC C COURT T m 1 Tho The supreme court today handed down own three opinions tho the judg judgments ments of oC time the lower courts In nit all three Instances 1710 was Ina that of ot Hugh Heavy vs s tie the U Commercial Na National hank blink of or Ogden appellant The Thie action w n brought In Ih Weber county c to It was 19 alleged plain plaintiff tiff was na compelled to 10 pay n nut nil of a n draft which defendant drew and delivered to the wrong ron party Ao to the tho ho acts In the tho fn cane e eP P 1 M t deposited the tho above amount In the Pie defendant batik bank for thu th of ot James Malloy Mallo of ot Corinne Notice of oC the lie deposit depo lt was erroneously sent to 10 James Jomes of ot Denver who ordered tho lie bank bani to send him a 1 draft for the time amount which was done lone Mal Malloy Mallay lay loy presented time tho th draft for tor or payment nt at ata atIL a IL bank blIk and titter plaintiff had endorsed It Il by b I WIlY if it Identification of Malloy the time money mOlle was paid to tho the lat hat latter latter ter or orThe The Ogden bank discovered Its m mIll take and stopped the payment of ot the draft III In York 1011 The rhe draft tas then thell protested by b tho time New York hank bank and Iud returned to Denver where be the t e amount of tho thin same vas deducted from Crom plain plaintiffs tiffs bank bonk account Suit wan then filed flied by hy plaintiff to recover tho the above amount from tho the Ogden n judgment was w rendered In his favor This judgment Is nI by tIme the he su PeoRia premo court which holds that It was WR nothing but carelessness which caused cau defendant to make such a 0 Io an Its were swore well itch acquainted with the time signature of or the right James Jamell Malloy he Ito being a 1 stockholder In time tho bank and having an nn account there thore Tho The epic opinion ion me ns written by Justice Mccarty and concurred In lii by Chief and Justice r JAVOUS ams ms Tho Time same Bame Justice wrote nole the opinion In Inthe Inthe the tho case w o of ot Agnes gnes J vs VII time tha State Hoard of ot Commissioners Tho Iho suit wan brought In this county to compel defendant to award to plaintiff the preference right to a certain tain talut piece of oC land lanI In lii this county oiny till amid to award her credit for the me value of time tho Improvements thereon In making tim the appraisement of ot the tho value of ot tho the land Judge JUdg Stewart who tried time the cast ren remi rendered dered derc Judgment In iii favor of ot plaintiff It Jt was grantors grantom had on aim time the from tron 1867 HI HIto lo to 1893 95 whon mike sho the some MOIO huts hail hl ever oer since there hero rite Tho court In tho time Judg ment nf ot tho tha ho lower holds that n a party parr purchasing a it right rl hl from nn an nuttIer In Is to the time sauce u under tho time as iii a his imus bl grantor 1 The Plus TIt decision of ot JI Bt wart In time III case rahl 01 ol lIu by vs 8 the Iho UI llY wa trims also af IC by b the no court The fhe ui I Ilion lion lieu was wan brought t oYer H due for far r lonn d th Iii thit company to tn op rAte mt It ts Ita It mil imn by Colt toot that the Q n y wa In to lo U be out tHat of this the th II of sit iho I t mine awl a If Ir wr iere ere n 1 It WM ivas tie u r Pr r to be he f lower lOwr outlet court mn ran red In iii t r of Qt and appeal Th The of If ih mite eo H iL Huv HII I lut I I I ti I a A 11 v t Welt tiled ma fur fir I I liter 1111 In iii the ike I reuss MU a i wS H fl list 01 f lisS I 4 in 1 j ji L III It I lb I I tilt iii lj II i It I MAW a teem MrM W I tk it stel v Ull it Ie j It i fur hi si K felony 1011 Ww ft set r m lite iri 1011 in lit i i ihl ibis hi lily un eli f Pub 11 n tO UI I II I a sJ mew liMO I IV I II H SS SW el o on 00 I II I III hie au I II ilu I eli 14 ku ka I I 1111 1 lelL 05 II iii wi 4 uJ 4 I 11 it till 1111 1111 Is t v loCI III IIII 11 I ht lud I 11 Iii Iiii i ki t I ui 11 I I II I W Ic 11 tw kit I |