Show ST L Lf SAYS A WIFE Witt W AS FLICHT T Defendant Flies Files Answer to the tin Divorce Dorce Complaint in Third District D Court Cout ASKS FOR CUSTODY OF CHILD Alleges TIt That ill Ills I Wife Off OtT Offspring Of spring ami auth Is Not Fit Ift Person To Care for It I IW W lv II 11 1 today nn an ni to ti the Ihl divorce complaint flied Hied met against lila by I Amelia It Ii I Stock In which witch he denies don Ie tint that ho lit I used usell abusive Inn toward her hur or failed ailed to furnish her Ir II r with wih proper medicine or care when the itte ile wa sva was HI iii II He lie 1 alleges that he h i fur Cur furnished her hel with alt all ni the tire pro lIre by hy tim tho attending physician h mind further that ho furnished a 1 nursa for forier or her he ier He lie denies that his tile wife left leCt their lIttle home hOle through fear of lf lint him but bu tint that ale was trait IH of ot such euh su h u a I disposition I tint she cite he would suddenly leave him hint without notice or r cause cluse aol and alt go to the Iho home hom of or her parents or elsewhere ro antI stay eta tot for weeks W nt cut u a time Defendant tint upon tipoti juet Ju ProVocation pro provocation vocation lie ite culled called bin hil hl Hes brother a n cur clr ant and n a 1 puppy dog 10 He lie alleges hat t bin hl iI wife took the tha child went vent to ta the tha home hOlle of ot her het brother to keep hoPe houpe for tor hun him hll Ild has refused to 10 re me return Ie to 10 him claims that turn hll He lie le Is I not lot a fit f person to have lItre the tho care caN of or orth their th lr for Cor tic the II reason raon that she hI neg neglects ne neglect lect It I rind he lie has often oren come comae home tome from work vork and 1 found the tho child chie dirty anti ho Ito would have hae to wash clean It I He lie Hl therefore asks osk tInt Ihal the plaintiff ak nothing by h her action and nd thAt n a suitable person be he to ho hive have havethe the custody cu trO of or tIe the lh child co io that It may love hn 0 Proper cure care and attention JOHN JOhI COHN ACCUSED A Stephens filed stilt milt for Cor or divorce In iii the district court today against Stephens on the ground of hab bib habitual drunkenness They rhe were married on June 20 1898 lt It I Is ii alleged that af nC after 01 ter their marriage became b addicted to the use of Intoxicating liquors aid became BO so 10 abusive that r was compelled to leave nc hint him Defendant promised to quit lilt di Minkin inking and Induced 1 his lie wife to return to 10 him hll hut In thu Ihu year 1102 ho agaIn com coin commenced commenced fenced the tho use of oC liquor and plaintiff again left lef him She inks that chic ho be b P granted u a sum Hlll for alimony alit alec nilo attorneys u t 1 fees reCK isi g t Ul lr nu nn Heaped l nl d CooN of ot Fire nrc on Head licad len lOCI lu C I a 1 red man WI ar or arraigned the before Morse Moise lolle In hl criminal c I 01 division of oC Jho I hI district court title on 01 th charge o of oC arson anti and a I plea idea of uC guilty ul Ito Ho l tIme for Cor sentence lence In ind 1 j Was Wa sentenced by hy the court cout to nine nile month I III In II the plate ile prison Nl l Browl on oil Jan JI 20 2 sot cot fot fire Oro to some Nomo bedding nt nl tha homo of oC Frank W Ilos JO f State Siule street al and ana attempted to burn hum the house down Committed Cumin to tl School S Fred Frell ft I boy hoy H 14 1 years oars of oC age n c wan committed to 10 the tho state Industrial today by b Judge More doree on cit 01 the charge of ot su 11 1 E Two f o Opinion 1 in Down Iba Ono One Af if Affirms firms firme Other Oilier r H 11 The court today toI tho thu th judgment of ot the lower lover court In Iii tim tho ruSe cano nf oC City Ii ity appellant v VA ss D DLee C CLee l lIC Lee C F William IC Wallace J C Wood and 0 a W i tie The action was ViC In tn al county to 10 recover te Oer the sum elm of oC 25 23 5 which plaintiff expended In iii building a IL little over nn Irrigation ditch to defendants which crossed Fourth I West Vee street In ii A city or el was ae paused i aeed compelling parties to Lii hull build a 11 18 flume 1110 Inside tho titO city elty elt limits Defendants refused to comply with wih tint the th nod proceeded to build n a 1 Hume lum and IUt then undertook to 10 collect the cost of ot the tho came Defendant demurred to 10 tho tint com coin complaint COl plaint on ott tile the ground that It IL did not furls facts constituting a CHUFO cauto CIU o of oC ac W action Il tion Tie The ho demurrer was wn and II tie tho complaint dismissed Plaintiff then thon to tho ho supreme court which court today tie the judgment J lent The Th coul opinion wan WH written by bt b Justice antI and A concurred In lit by Justices and 1111 Mccarty The h holds that there Is nothing In Iii II the tho city ordin ordinance tort ance which I s the city power to ro re recover cover In such a n case JUDGMENT JUDO Il 1 ho Judgment I of If r tie tho lower court coUtt lit in litHie 11 Hie tho rice cane of ue Don Domi C t C Seeley n s tue CIO o i t mit i Cn toil and III Agricultural I tural 1 association was Wil tnt today todo reversed by h l Iho lilt court with to it tho tie complaint 1111 tutu proceed with lh the tho case The Tho Ilo action was sin Wil brought In n Winery county to II It recover tOO ns as asI 11 ml I I I el for lo failure ii Ii tire to t 1 ti fit furnish ri lh h idi plaintiff lot I if the amount of or to which bo lit hl ho hu vie wis wal rio Tho defend Ill tilt Mil claimed tint It I levied nil 11 au asso s on itt Its UK for rr tie the 0 of Ul Oi 11 rt a 1 reservoir and that thit plain tC tIff Iff falle l to hi II i III lIY ny the on UI his for tor de dc stock Judgment JUll wan WI vii 1 l 1111 an in appeal ol W WIK B taken by h 11 lila lOt The fhe supreme court holds holl ii that t hR t here wits vIs no authority tU uteri t y In defendants II HIS lr articles of ot Incorporation for fo levying nn an for Cor mich Hueh a IL 1 purpose hen hene henhe the I he IC name attic wn WIN S void old oid Tilt j was tae wal slated Justice as wrote tito I the opinion of ot tin tha court aid ond It was Sus Wil concurred In Ii 11 by Iy Chief Jus Uco nm nude Justice McCarty |